Cardiovascular risk and JAK inhibitor for the treatment of spondyloarthritis: A systematic review

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Rim Dhahri
Lobna Ben Ammar
Soumaya Boussaid
Syrine Bellakhal
Imene Gharsallah
Hela Sahli
Mohamed Hedi Douggui

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this review is to evaluate cardiovascular safety of Janus Kinas (JAK) inhibitors in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA).


Methods: Applying the PRISMA methodology, we searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases using the following search terms: Janus kinase inhibitors, spondyloarthritis, cardiac risk and major adverse cardiovascular event. Randomized controlled trials that reported Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) in patients treated with JAK inhibitors for SpA were included.


Results: Ten radomized controlled trials conducted between 2017 and 2024 were analyzed, encompassing 2671 patients with an active SpA and treated with JAK inhibitors (tofacitinib, upadacitinib and filgotinib). The follow-up duration ranged from 12 to 104 weeks. Only three MACE were reported with upadacitinib (15 mg/day) : one non-fatal haemorrhagic stroke after 52 weeks of treatment in a patient with a history of smoking and a myocardial infarction and a cerebral hemorrhage after 104 weeks in the same population, corresponding to an incidence rate of 0.3 per 100 patient-years (95% CI: 0.0–1.1).


Conclusions: This systemic review highlights the safety of JAK inhibitors according to MACE occurrence in patients with SpA when compared to placebo.  These results need to be interpreted with caution regarding the limited long-term data and small sample sizes in clinical trials. Long-term studies are needed to clarify these risks.

Keywords:

Major adverse cardiovascular event, Cardiovascular risk, Spondyloarthritis, Janus Kinase Inhibitors, systematic review

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. van der Linden S, Valkenburg HA, Cats A. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum. avr 1984;27(4):361‑8.
  2. Boussaid S, Ben Majdouba M, Rekik S, Jammali S, Cheour E, Sahli H, et al. Poor work outcomes in patients with spondyloarthritis: causes, consequences, and solutions. Clin Rheumatol. 1 févr 2022;41(2):463‑70.
  3. Akkoc N, Khan M. JAK Inhibitors for Axial Spondyloarthritis: what does the Future Hold? Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2021;23(6):34.
  4. Braun J, Kiltz U, Baraliakos X. Emerging therapies for the treatment of spondyloarthritides with focus on axial spondyloarthritis. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 1 févr 2023;23(2):195‑206.
  5. Raychaudhuri S, Shah RJ, Raychaudhuri SK, Raychaudhuri SP. Janus kinase inhibitors for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2024;90(2):186‑91.
  6. Boussaid S, Dhahri R, Rahmouni S, Ceylan Hİ, Hassayoun M, Abbes M, et al. Impact of Biologic Drugs on Comorbidity Outcomes in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med. janv 2025;14(13):4547.
  7. Harrington R, Harkins P, Conway R. Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Update on the Efficacy and Safety of Tofacitinib, Baricitinib and Upadacitinib. J Clin Med. 23 oct 2023;12(20):6690.
  8. Charles-Schoeman C, Choy E, McInnes IB, Mysler E, Nash P, Yamaoka K, et al. MACE and VTE Across Upadacitinib Clinical Trial Programs in Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Ankylosing Spondylitis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022;74((Charles-Schoeman C.) Division of Rheumatology, University of California, Los Angeles, Santa Monica, CA, United States):1016‑9.
  9. Kwan A, Ingrid E, Jiang M, Lim KKT. The cardiovascular risk of JAK inhibitors in treating rheumatic diseases. Int J Rheum Dis [Internet]. 2024;27(8). Disponible sur: https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L2031084172&from=export
  10. Hammitzsch A, Lorenz G, Moog P. Impact of Janus Kinase Inhibition on the Treatment of Axial Spondyloarthropathies. Front Immunol [Internet]. 2020;11((Hammitzsch A., Ariane.Hammitzsch@gmail.com; Lorenz G.; Moog P.) Section of Rheumatology, Department of Nephrology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany). Disponible sur: https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L633312953&from=export
  11. Ljung L, Rantapää-Dahlqvist S. Biological therapies and lipid profile. Eur Musculoskelet Rev. 2011;6(4):240‑7.
  12. Dimosiari A, Michailidis T, Patoulias D. Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: Great news, but some concerns on cardiovascular disease risk still exist. Eur J Intern Med. 2022;103((Dimosiari A.) Department of Emergency Medicine, General Hospital “Hippokration”, Thessaloniki, Greece):107‑8.
  13. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 29 mars 2021;10:89.
  14. Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Landewé R, Listing J, Akkoc N, Brandt J, et al. The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part II): validation and final selection. Ann Rheum Dis. juin 2009;68(6):777‑83.
  15. Lorette G, Maruani A. Les recommandations CONSORT (CONsolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials). Ann Dermatol Vénéréologie. juin 2013;140(6‑7):431‑5.
  16. Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 28 août 2019;366:l4898.
  17. Baraliakos X, van der Heijde D, Sieper J, Inman RD, Kameda H, Li Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with ankylosing spondylitis refractory to biologic therapy: 1-year results from the open-label extension of a phase III study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2023;25:172.
  18. Baraliakos X, van der Heijde D, Sieper J, Inman RD, Kameda H, Maksymowych WP, et al. Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis refractory to biologic therapy: 2-year clinical and radiographic results from the open-label extension of the SELECT-AXIS 2 study. Arthritis Res Ther. 12 nov 2024;26(1):197.
  19. Deodhar A, Sliwinska-Stanczyk P, Xu H, Baraliakos X, Gensler LS, Fleishaker D, et al. Tofacitinib for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a phase III, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Ann Rheum Dis. août 2021;80(8):1004‑13.
  20. Deodhar A, Akar S, Curtis J, Zorkany B, Magrey M, Wang C, et al. INTEGRATED SAFETY ANALYSIS of TOFACITINIB in ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS CLINICAL TRIALS. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022;81((Deodhar A.) Oregon Health&Science University, Division of Arthritis and Rheumatic Diseases, Portland, OR, United States):394‑5.
  21. Deodhar A, Van Den Bosch F, Poddubnyy D, Maksymowych W, Van Der Heijde D, Kim T, et al. EFFICACY and SAFETY of UPADACITINIB in PATIENTS with ACTIVE NON-RADIOGRAPHIC AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS: a DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED PHASE 3 TRIAL. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022;81:9‐10.
  22. van der Heijde D, Deodhar A, Wei JC, Drescher E, Fleishaker D, Hendrikx T, et al. Tofacitinib in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a phase II, 16-week, randomised, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study. Ann Rheum Dis. août 2017;76(8):1340‑7.
  23. van der Heijde D, Baraliakos X, Gensler L, Maksymowych W, Tseluyko V, Nadashkevich O, et al. Efficacy and safety of filgotinib, a selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor, in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (TORTUGA): results from a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Lond Engl. 2018;392(10162):2378‐2387.
  24. van der Heijde D, Song I, Pangan A, Deodhar A, van den Bosch F, Maksymowych W, et al. Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (SELECT-AXIS 1): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Lond Engl. 2019;394(10214):2108‐2117.
  25. van der Heijde D, Deodhar A, Maksymowych WP, Sieper J, Van den Bosch F, Kim TH, et al. Upadacitinib in active ankylosing spondylitis: results of the 2-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled SELECT-AXIS 1 study and open-label extension. RMD Open. juill 2022;8(2):e002280.
  26. van der Heijde D, Baraliakos X, Sieper J, Deodhar A, Inman R, Kameda H, et al. Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib for active ankylosing spondylitis refractory to biological therapy: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022;81(11):1515‐1523.
  27. Dhahri R, Mejri I, Ghram A, Dghaies A, Slouma M, Boussaid S, et al. Assessment Tools for Pulmonary Involvement in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis: Is Diaphragmatic Ultrasonography Correlated to Spirometry? J Multidiscip Healthc. 11 janv 2023;16:51‑61.
  28. Libby P. History of Discovery: Inflammation in Atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. sept 2012;32(9):2045‑51.
  29. Zhang Y, Lu N, Peloquin C, Dubreuil M, Neogi T, Aviña-Zubieta JA, et al. Improved survival in rheumatoid arthritis: a general population-based cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis. févr 2017;76(2):408‑13.
  30. Li N, Gou ZP, Du SQ, Zhu XH, Lin H, Liang XF, et al. Effect of JAK inhibitors on high- and low-density lipoprotein in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Clin Rheumatol. 1 mars 2022;41(3):677‑88.
  31. Kotyla PJ, Islam MA, Engelmann M. Clinical Aspects of Janus Kinase (JAK) Inhibitors in the Cardiovascular System in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Int J Mol Sci. 7 oct 2020;21(19):7390.
  32. Xu D, Xu R, He L, Xu T, Zhang Z, Han D, et al. Comparison of Pathogenic Mechanisms Underlying Single and Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism Based on Gene Expression Profiling. Ann Vasc Surg. 1 oct 2016;36:252‑9.
  33. Ramiro S, Nikiphorou E, Sepriano A, Ortolan A, Webers C, Baraliakos X, et al. ASAS-EULAR recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis: 2022 update. Ann Rheum Dis. janv 2023;82(1):19‑34.