Why publish? Perspectives of North African researchers in the medical field
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
The act of publishing research is not just a procedural step; it is a fundamental part of the scientific process. It ensures transparency, accountability, and the continuous evolution of knowledge. This perspective paper aimed to revisit the theoretical reasons/motivations that lead researchers in the medical field to engaging in the publication process, and to determine those of researchers from a low-income country (Tunisia). When researchers publish their findings, they provide a foundation upon which others can build. This iterative process is what drives innovation and discovery. Moreover, the global nature of scientific research means that publications often transcend borders, enabling international collaboration. In addition, the societal impact of research cannot be overstated. Publications often serve as the ridge between scientific discovery and real-world application. Finally, the ethical dimension of publishing is also significant. By sharing their work, researchers contribute to the democratization of knowledge, ensuring that scientific advancements are accessible to all, rather than being confined to a select few. This is particularly important in addressing global challenges such as climate change, pandemics, and inequality. The responses of a 44 university hospital doctors and doctoral students from a low-income country to the question “why publish?”, show a lack of awareness of the importance of publishing, both academically and economically. In summary, the publication of research is a multifaceted endeavor that serves both the scientific community and society. It is a testament to the collaborative and progressive nature of human inquiry, driving us toward a better understanding of the world and our place withinb it.
Keywords:
Scientific Communication, Research Ethics, Knowledge Dissemination, Global Health, Developing Countries##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
- Louis Pasteur Quotes. Brainy Quotes. Link: https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/louis_pasteur_164090 (Last visit: April 16, 2025).
- Brissot P. Pourquoi et comment publier dans le domaine médico-scientifique? Bull Acad Natl Med. 2022;206(7):889-93.
- Ben Saad H. Scientific medical writing in practice: How to succeed the writing style? Tunis Med. 2019;97(2):273-85.
- Ben Saad H. Scientific medical writing in practice: the <> format. Tunis Med. 2019;97(3):407-25.
- Ben Abdelaziz A, Ben Saad H, Zakhama L. <>: Welcome to the Tunisian champions of scientific medical writing. Tunis Med. 2022;100(3):180-4.
- No authors listed. Publish or perish. Nature. 2010;467(7313):252.
- Tzarnas S, Tzarnas CD. Publish or perish, and pay--the new paradigm of open-access journals. J Surg Educ. 2015;72(2):283-5.
- Khemiss M, Berrezouga L, Ben Khelifa M, Masmoudi T, Ben Saad H. Understanding of plagiarism among North-African university hospital doctors (UHDs): A pilot study. Account Res. 2019;26(2):65-84.
- To WM, Yu BTW. Rise in higher education researchers and academic publications. Emerald Open Research. 2020;1(3).
- Nguyen TTH, Pham HH, Vuong QH, Cao QT, Dinh VH, Nguyen DD. The adoption of international publishing within Vietnamese academia from 1986 to 2020: A review. Learn Publ. 2020;34(2):175-86.
- Putera PB, Suryanto S, Ningrum S, Widianingsih I, Rianto Y. Policies of scholarly journal accreditation in Indonesia. Sci Ed. 2021;8(2):166-71.
- Oliveira EA, Oliveira MCL, Colosimo EA, Martelli DB, Silva LR, Silva A, et al. Global scientific production in the pre-Covid-19 Era: An analysis of 53 countries for 22 years. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2022;94(suppl 3):e20201428.
- Shaban SF, Abu-Zidan FM. A quantitative analysis of medical publications from Arab countries. Saudi Med J. 2003;24(3):294-6.
- Pouris A, Pouris A. The state of science and technology in Africa (2000–2004): A scientometric assessment. Scientometrics. 2008;79(2):297-309.
- Tunisian Republic. Decree No. 2009-772 of March 28, 2009, establishing the special status of the body of hospital-university physicians. JORT. 2009;(27): Chapter I, Article 3. Link: http://www.atds.org.tn/Decret2009_772.pdf (Last visit: April 16, 2025).
- Dergaa I, Ben Saad H. Artificial intelligence and promoting open access in academic publishing. Tunis Med. 2023;101(6):533-6.
- Dergaa I, Zakhama L, Dziri C, Ben Saad H. Enhancing scholarly discourse in the age of artificial intelligence: A guided approach to effective peer review process. Tunis Med. 2023;101(10):721-6.
- Aronson JK. When I use a word . . . Academic publishing: the impact factor. BMJ. 2025;388:r333.
- What is considered a good impact factor? Link: https://mdanderson.libanswers.com/faq/26159?utm_source=chatgpt.com (Last visit: April 16, 2025).
- Gupta H. h Index and its limitations. J Family Med Prim Care. 2024;13(6):2529-30.
- John JJ, John ES, Pioppo L, Gupta A, Chokhavatia S, Tilara A. Gender disparity in academic gastroenterology: Beginning of the end of the underrepresentation of women? Dig Dis Sci. 2022;67(2):380-7.
- Retraction Watch. Link: https://retractionwatch.com/ (Last visit: April 16, 2025).
- Retraction Watch database. Link: http://retractiondatabase.org/RetractionSearch.aspx?AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1 (Last visit: April 16, 2025).
- Else H. Impact factors are still widely used in academic evaluations. Nature. 2019.
- High council for the evaluation of research and higher education. Evaluation Frameworks. 2015-2023. Link: https://www.hceres.fr/fr/publications/referentiel-pour-levaluation-externe-des-etablissements-campagne-devaluation-2020-2021 (Last visit: April 16, 2025).
- Hidouri S, Kamoun H, Salah S, Jellad A, Ben Saad H. Key guidelines for responding to reviewers. F1000Res. 2024;13:921.
- Ahannach S, Van Hoyweghen I, Verhoeven V, Lebeer S. Citizen science as an instrument for women's health research. Nat Med. 2024;30(12):3445-54.
- Zielinski C. Reducing the risks of nuclear war—the role of health professionals. Tunis Med. 2023;101(8-9):654-6.
- Washif JA, Farooq A, Krug I, Pyne DB, Verhagen E, Taylor L, et al. Training during the COVID-19 lockdown: Knowledge, beliefs, and practices of 12,526 athletes from 142 countries and six continents. Sports Med. 2022;52(4):933-48.
- Hangel N, Schmidt-Pfister D. Why do you publish? On the tensions between generating scientific knowledge and publication pressure. Aslib J Inf Manag. 2017;69(5):529-44.
- Scientific production bonus. Link: http://www.gsr.rnu.tn/fr/frontend/primechercheurs (Last visit: April 16, 2025).
- Sadok Besrour Foundation. Link: https://medfam.umontreal.ca/recherche/chaires-fonds/la-chaire-docteur-sadok-besrour/ (Last visit: April 16, 2025).
- Franklin RE, Gosling RG. Evidence for 2-chain helix in crystalline structure of sodium deoxyribonucleate. Nature. 1953;172(4369):156-7.
- Sahih Muslim, Book 13 (The Book of Bequests), Hadith 4005. Link: http://ddata.over-blog.com/4/22/62/75/0/Sahih-Mouslim.docx (Last visit: April 16, 2025).
- Carobene A, Padoan A, Cabitza F, Banfi G, Plebani M. Rising adoption of artificial intelligence in scientific publishing: evaluating the role, risks, and ethical implications in paper drafting and review process. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2024;62(5):835-43.
- Methnani J, Gaddas M, Thabet H, Dergaa I, Ben Saad H. Can generative AI improve academic journal selection decisions? Assessing traditional and algorithmic approaches in medical research. Tunis Med (under press).
- Fakhfakh R, Gaddas M, Dahmane R, Ben Saida I, Ben Saad H. How to Publish? Responses of medical researchers in a North African developing country. Tunis Med. (under press).
- Dahmane R, Fakhfakh R, Gaddas M, Ben Saida I, Ben Saad H. When to publish? Perspectives of North African researchers in the medical field. Tunis Med. (under press).