Transcultural Arabic validation of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5, Child and Adolescent version

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Nourchene Kouki
Hela Rezgui
Aida Naffeti
Moncef Hamdoun
Soumaya Bourgou
Ahlem Belhadj

Abstract

Introduction : Posttraumatic stress disorder PTSD in the pediatric population has clinical features. The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5,child and adolescent version (CAPS-CA-5) is the gold standard in positive diagnosis. Our study had two primary objectives, first, to translate the CAPS-CA-5 into Tunisian dialectal Arabic, and second, to validate the translated version within the Tunisian sociocultural context.


Methods: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in two hospital departments. We recruited children older than seven years who were exposed to a potentially traumatic event at least one month before. We validated the tool through translation, content, construct validity and reliability.


Results:  The validation was made on 146 records after the exclusion of 4 incompleted assessments. We initially translated the CAPS-CA-5 into Tunisian dialect. We validated the content through pre-test and scientific committee evaluation. Afterwards we validated the construction. We calculated the Bartlett's sphericity test (p<0.001) and the KMO index that was 0.766. Concerning the reliability study, we found a Cronbach's alpha coefficient equal to 0.92. We studied the inter-rater reliability via the intra-class coefficient which was between 0.8 and 1. 


Conclusion:  We validated the CAPS CA5 in our cultural context with satisfactory psychometric qualities. This tool will facilitate the early detection and diagnosis of PTSD in pediatric population.

Keywords:

Validation, translation, CAPS-CA-5, PTSD, children, adolescent

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Pai A, Suris AM, North CS. Posttraumatic stress disorder in the DSM-5: Controversy, change, and conceptual considerations. Behavioral Sciences 2017;7:7.
  2. national center for PTSD KH. National Center for PTSD. https://www.ptsd.va.gov/ professional/assessment/child/caps-ca.asp n.d.
  3. Houbre B, Dodeler V, Peter L, Auxéméry Y, Lanfranchi J-B, Tarquinio C. Stress post-traumatique et altération des schémas cognitifs: cas de la victimation à l’école. L’Evolution Psychiatrique 2012;77:1–14.
  4. Rossignol M, Philippot P, Vögele C. Réactivité physiologique et conscience intéroceptive dans les troubles anxieux pédiatriques: une revue conceptuelle et empirique. Santé Mentale Au Québec 2016;41:183–222.
  5. Charfi F, Hamouda AB, Bourgou S, Hamza M, Belhadj A. Covid-19 et troubles mentaux chez l’enfant et l’adolescent: Expérience du service de pédopsychiatrie de l’Hôpital Mongi Slim de Tunis Covid-19 and mental disorders in children and adolescents: Experience of the child and adolescent psychiatry department of the Mongi Slim Hospital of Tunis. LA TUNISIE MEDICALE 2020;98:619–24.
  6. Ogle CM, Block SD, Harris LS, Goodman GS, Pineda A, Timmer S, et al. Autobiographical memory specificity in child sexual abuse victims. Development and Psychopathology 2013;25:321–32.
  7. Strand VC, Sarmiento TL, Pasquale LE. Assessment and screening tools for trauma in children and adolescents: A review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse 2005;6:55–78.
  8. Prins A, Bovin MJ, Smolenski DJ, Marx BP, Kimerling R, Jenkins-Guarnieri MA, et al. The primary care PTSD screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5): development and evaluation within a veteran primary care sample. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2016;31:1206–11.
  9. Foa EB, Asnaani A, Zang Y, Capaldi S, Yeh R. Psychometrics of the Child PTSD Symptom Scale for DSM-5 for trauma-exposed children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology 2018;47:38–46.
  10. Sachser C, Berliner L, Holt T, Jensen TK, Jungbluth N, Risch E, et al. International development and psychometric properties of the Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen (CATS). Journal of Affective Disorders 2017;210:189–95.
  11. Rolon-Arroyo B, Oosterhoff B, Layne CM, Steinberg AM, Pynoos RS, Kaplow JB. The UCLA PTSD reaction index for DSM-5 brief form: A screening tool for trauma-exposed youths. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 2020;59:434–43.
  12. Weathers FW, Bovin MJ, Lee DJ, Sloan DM, Schnurr PP, Kaloupek DG, et al. The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM–5 (CAPS-5): Development and initial psychometric evaluation in military veterans. Psychological Assessment 2018;30:383.
  13. Hunt JC, Chesney SA, Jorgensen TD, Schumann NR, deRoon-Cassini TA. Exploring the gold-standard: Evidence for a two-factor model of the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale for the DSM–5. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy 2018;10:551.
  14. Diehle J, de Roos C, Boer F, Lindauer RJ. A cross-cultural validation of the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale for Children and Adolescents in a Dutch population. European Journal of Psychotraumatology 2013;4:19896.
  15. Barroca I, Velosa A, Cotovio G, Santos CM, Riggi G, Costa RP, et al. Translation and Validation of the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-CA-5) for Portuguese Children and Adolescents. Acta Medica Portuguesa 2022;35.
  16. Schulte C, Zarski A-C, Sachser C, Rosner R, Ebert DD. Internet-and mobile-based trauma-focused intervention for adolescents and young adults with posttraumatic stress disorder: a study protocol of a proof-of-concept feasibility study. European Journal of Psychotraumatology 2022;13:2101345.
  17. Vallerand RJ. Vers une méthodologie de validation trans-culturelle de questionnaires psychologiques: Implications pour la recherche en langue française. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne 1989;30:662.
  18. Heren-Le Bastard C, Bernard A, Fliss R, Legouvello S, Allain P. Validation psychométrique d’un Questionnaire d’Évaluation de la Perception et de l’Adaptation au Handicap Visuel chez l’Adulte (QUEPAHVA). Journal Français d’Ophtalmologie 2021;44:24–34.
  19. Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education 2011;2:53.
  20. Berger J-L. Analyse factorielle exploratoire et analyse en composantes principales: guide pratique 2021.
  21. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha. Bmj 1997;314:572.
  22. Forina M, Armanino C, Lanteri S, Leardi R. Methods of varimax rotation in factor analysis with applications in clinical and food chemistry. Journal of Chemometrics 1989;3:115–25.
  23. Laurencelle L. L’alpha de Cronbach, ses émules, la consistance interne, la délité: une mise au point 2021.
  24. Bourque J, Doucet D, LeBlanc J, Dupuis J, Nadeau J. L’alpha de Cronbach est l’un des pires estimateurs de la consistance interne: une étude de simulation. Revue Des Sciences de l’éducation 2019;45:78–99.