Lacrimal tract trauma: Epidemiological aspects and prognostic factors in a population of southern Tunisia

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Aug 1, 2025
https://doi.org/10.62438/tunismed.v103i8.5252
Download
pdf
Vol. 103 No. 8 (2025): Tunis Med Aug 2025

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Omar Feki
Ophthalmology Department, Habib Bourguiba Hospital, Sfax, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia.
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9260-5928
Mona Rekik
Ophthalmology Department, Habib Bourguiba Hospital, Sfax, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1758-1716
Sonda Kammoun
Ophthalmology Department, Habib Bourguiba Hospital, Sfax, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia.
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5932-4833
Mariam Sehli
Ophthalmology Department, Habib Bourguiba Hospital, Sfax, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia.
Imene Kaibi
Ophthalmology Department, Habib Bourguiba Hospital, Sfax, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia.
Amira Trigui
Ophthalmology Department, Habib Bourguiba Hospital, Sfax, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia.
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6945-4586

Abstract

Introduction : The epidemiology and management of lacrimal tract trauma (LTT) vary depending on the populations, the skills, and resources of the healthcare team.


Aim : To examine the epidemiological and therapeutic aspects of LTT and their prognostic factors in southern Tunisia.


Methods : The study included 35 patients with LTT treated in the ophthalmology department of the Habib Bourguiba Hospital in Sfax. The postoperative result was evaluated functionally, anatomically, and aesthetically, and classified as good, average, or poor.


Results : Patients were aged 28±18 years, with a sex ratio of 3.4. Domestic and road accidents and fights represented 93% of the causes of LTT. The lesions affected more frequently both the left side (71%) and the inferior canaliculus (74%). Most patients (91%) were operated on within the first 48 hours. The internal fragment was identified by the Bowman probe (in 83% of cases) and sutured in all patients with true monocanalicular intubation by mini-Monoka probe in 94% of cases. The post-operative result was good in 83% of patients. Younger age, loss of eyelid substance, delay in surgical intervention, and lacrimal suture without intubation were associated with unsatisfactory postoperative results.


Conclusions : LTT affects mostly young male adults. Age under 20 years, post-traumatic operative delay above 48 hours, loss of eyelid substance, as well as suture of the wound without intubation are the main risk factors for a poor postoperative result. Good awareness and respect for the means of protection would make ...( abstract truncated at 250 words)

Keywords:

Epiphora, Intubation, Lacrimal ducts, Trauma

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Ducasse A, Lagier J, Adenis JP. Traumatologie lacrymale. Ophtalmologie [Internet]. 2015; Disponible à: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0246-0343(15)54181-6
  2. Fayet B, Bernard JA, Ammar J, Karpouzas Y, Hamici S, Hamache F, et al. Contribution à l’étude des plaies récentes des voies lacrymales. A propos de 262 cas traités en urgence. J Fr Ophtalmol. 1988;11(10):627‑37.
  3. Jordan DR, Ziai S, Gilberg SM, Mawn LA. Pathogenesis of canalicular lacerations. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;24(5):394‑8.
  4. Sundar G. Lacrimal Trauma and Its Management. Dans: Ali MJ, éditeur. Principles and Practice of Lacrimal Surgery [Internet]. Singapore: Springer; 2018 [cité 31 oct 2023]. p. 379‑94. Disponible à: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5442-6_35
  5. Mukherjee B, Dhobekar M. Traumatic nasolacrimal duct obstruction: clinical profile, management, and outcome. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2013;23(5):615‑22.
  6. Ducasse A, Segal A, Thelliez E, Reynal C. Les plaies de paupières : Etude rétrospective sur 6 ans. Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr. 1994;(94):727‑32.
  7. Han J, Chen H, Wang T, Zhang X, Jin X. A case series study of lacrimal canalicular laceration repair with the bi-canalicular stent. Gland Surg. nov 2022;11(11):1801‑7.
  8. Ducasse A, Valle D, Scholtes F, Segal A, Brugniart C. Plaies palpébro-lacrymales de l'enfant [Palpebral and lacrimal system injuries in children]. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2009 May;32(5):374-9. French. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2009.04.002.
  9. Han S, Wang T, Jia J, Sun S, Fan Y. Bicanalicular Lacerations: Clinical Characteristics and Surgical Outcomes With a New Bicanalicular Silicone Stent. J Craniofac Surg. oct 2019;30(7):2261‑4.
  10. Bruno Fayet MEB Jean Antoine Bernard. Traumatologie lacrymale. Ophtalmologie [Internet]. 2000; Disponible à: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/s0246034300000265
  11. Jordan DR, Mawn L. Repair of canalicular lacerations. Am J Ophthalmol. nov 2008;146(5):792‑3; author reply 793.
  12. Olver J. Anatomie et physiologie du système lacrymal. Ophtalmologie [Internet]. 2006; Disponible à: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0246-0343(06)44840-1
  13. Reifler DM. Management of canalicular laceration. Surv Ophthalmol. 1991;36(2):113‑32.
  14. Touzet-Roumazeille S, Jayyosi L, Plenier Y, Guyot E, Guillard T, François C. Prise en charge chirurgicale des morsures animales chez l’enfant. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. oct 2016;61(5):560‑7.
  15. Singh S, Ganguly A, Hardas A, Tripathy D, Rath S. Canalicular lacerations: Factors predicting outcome at a tertiary eye care centre. Orbit Amst Neth. févr 2017;36(1):13‑8.
  16. Chu YC, Wu SY, Tsai YJ, Liao YL, Chu HY. Early Versus Late Canalicular Laceration Repair Outcomes. Am J Ophthalmol. oct 2017;182:155‑9.
  17. Herzum H, Holle P, Hintschich C. [Eyelid injuries: epidemiological aspects]. Ophthalmol Z Dtsch Ophthalmol Ges. nov 2001;98(11):1079‑82.
  18. Naik MN, Kelapure A, Rath S, Honavar SG. Management of canalicular lacerations: epidemiological aspects and experience with Mini-Monoka monocanalicular stent. Am J Ophthalmol. févr 2008;145(2):375‑80.
  19. Werb A. The history and development of lacrimal surgery in England and Europe. Adv Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986;5:233‑40.
  20. Ho T, Lee V. National survey on the management of lacrimal canalicular injury in the United Kingdom. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2006;34(1):39‑43.
  21. Chowdhury HR, Rose GE, Ezra DG. Long-term outcomes of monocanalicular repair of canalicular lacerations. Ophthalmology. août 2014;121(8):1665-1666.e1.
  22. Ducasse A, Arndt C, Brugniart C, Larre I. [Lacrimal traumatology]. J Fr Ophtalmol. févr 2016;39(2):213‑8.
  23. Dave TV, Ali MJ. Intubation in Lacrimal Surgery: Devices and Techniques. Dans: Ali MJ, éditeur. Principles and Practice of Lacrimal Surgery [Internet]. Singapore: Springer; 2018 p. 403‑15. Disponible à: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5442-6_37
  24. George JL, Heymann V, Berrod JP, Abellan P. Aspects actuels des sutures sans tuteur des plaies canaliculaires. Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr. janv 1985;85(1):81‑3.
  25. Bourges JL. Urgences en ophtalmologie: rapport de la Société française d’ophtalmologie. Issy-les-Moulineaux: Elsevier Masson; 2018.
  26. Ortiz MA, Kraushar MF. Lacrimal drainage following repair of inferior canaliculus. Ann Ophthalmol. mai 1975;7(5):739‑41.
  27. Murchison AP, Bilyk JR. Canalicular laceration repair: an analysis of variables affecting success. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;30(5):410‑4.