Attitudes of ophthalmologists towards pharmaceutical promotion

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Rym Maamouri
Asma Abid
Yasmine Houman
Meriem Ouederni
Monia Cheour

Abstract

Background: The interaction between physicians and pharmaceutical industry highlighted many issues lately concerning their influence on physician’s attitude and their prescribing behavior.


Aim: To evaluate the attitudes of Tunisian ophthalmologist towards pharmaceutical promotion.


Methods: Data was collected through an auto-administered anonymous questionnaire elaborated in French that was distributed to 160 ophthalmologists (residents and specialists) working in hospitals or private practices in four Tunisian governorates (Tunis, Sousse, Monastir and Sfax).


Results: One hundred and two valid responses were received. Twenty-nine respondents (28.43%) estimated the number of visits by pharmaceutical representatives (PR) at 11 to 20 times during the last year. Most physicians considered guides (94%), drug samples (88%), articles (86%), stationery (81%), sponsorship of overseas conferences (72%) and international trips to symposia organized by pharmaceutical industries (58%), as appropriate gifts. Over 80% of doctors agreed that promotional activities by drug companies were appropriate. Accepting sponsorship from a pharmaceutical company for a partner to attend a meeting was considered inappropriate by 79% of ophthalmologists. Eighty-eight percent of the respondents agreed that receiving gifts will increase their prescription of the company’s drug. However, they perceived themselves to be less influenced than their colleagues (p=0.011). Eighty-six percent of ophthalmologists reported training about how to interact with PR to be insufficient.


Conclusions: Despite the role of PR in supporting research, ethical issues may arise through their interactions with healthcare professionals. Training about pharmaceutical promotion and appropriate ways to deal with it are lacking in Tunisian medical schools’ curricula, leaving  ..... (abstract truncated at 250 words)

Keywords:

Attitude, Physicians, Laboratories, Drugs, Conflict of interest

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Institute for Health and Socio-Economic Policy. The R&D Smokescreen. The Prioritization of Marketing & Sales in the Pharmaceutical Industry: IHSP;2016. https://www.nationalnursesunited.org/sites/default/files/nnu/files/pdf/research/TheRDSmokecreenv1_1.pdf.
  2. Baskir E, Athauda G, Zeiarati GN, Kashan SB, Camps-Romero E, Gillis M. Active Learning to Promote Early and Effective Physician Interaction with Pharmaceutical Industry Marketing Practices. Med Sci Educ. 2020 ;30(2) :727-735.
  3. Zipkin DA, Steinman MA. Interactions Between Pharmaceutical Representatives and Doctors in Training. Journal of General Internal Medicine.2005 ; 20 :777–86.
  4. Jacob NT. Drug promotion practices: A review. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 ;84(8) :1659-1667.
  5. Fickweiler F, Fickweiler W, Urbach E. Interactions between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry generally and sales representatives specifically and their association with physicians' attitudes and prescribing habits: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2017 ;7(9): e016408.
  6. Koplovitz A, Freud T, Peleg R. Community physicians' attitudes towards meetings with representatives of pharmaceutical companies: a pilot study. J Pharm Policy Pract. 2023 ;16(1) :15.
  7. Wang Y, Adelman RA. A study of interactions between pharmaceutical representatives and ophthalmology trainees. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 ;148(4) :619-622.e3.
  8. Yimenu DK, Demeke CA, Kasahun AE, et al. Health professional's exposure, attitude, and acceptance of drug promotion by industry representatives: A cross-sectional study in Ethiopia. Sci Prog. 2021 ;104(2) :368504211029435.
  9. Alosaimi FD, Al Kaabba A, Qadi M, et al. Physicians' attitudes towards interaction with the pharmaceutical industry. East Mediterr Health J. 2015 ;20(12) :812-819.
  10. Madhavan S, Amonkar MM, Elliott D, Burke K, Gore P. The gift relationship between pharmaceutical companies and physicians: an exploratory survey of physicians. J Clin Pharm Ther. 1997 ;22(3) :207-215.
  11. Brax H, Fadlallah R, Al-Khaled L, et al. Association between physicians' interaction with pharmaceutical companies and their clinical practices: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017 ;12(4): e0175493.
  12. Lieb K, Brandtönies S. A survey of german physicians in private practice about contacts with pharmaceutical sales representatives. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2010 ;107 :392–8.
  13. Morgan MA, Dana J, Loewenstein G, et al. Interactions of doctors with the pharmaceutical industry. J Med Ethics. 2006 ;32 :559–63.
  14. Lajmi H, Lajmi M, Hmaied W. The characteristics of conflict of interest in the doctor's pharmaceutical representative Relationship. Tunis Med. 2022 ;100(2):127-132.
  15. Taylor SC, Huecker JB, Gordon MO, Vollman DE, Apte RS. Physician-Industry Interactions and Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Use Among US Ophthalmologists. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 ;134(8) :897-903.
  16. Mather C. The pipeline and the porcupine: alternate metaphors of the physician-industry relationship. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(6):1323-1334.
  17. Mintzes B. Geneva: World Health Organization and Health Action International; 2005. Educational initiatives for medical and pharmacy students about drug promotion: An international cross-sectional survey. Available: http://www.haiweb.org/26012006/MRhaipromosurveyFINAL06.pdf.
  18. Zarei E, Ghaffari A, Nikoobar A, Bastami S, Hamdghaddari H. Interaction between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry: A scoping review for developing a policy brief. Front Public Health. 2023 ;10 :1072708.
  19. Ophthalmologists and trainees’ interactions with the medical industry. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists (RANZCO). Approval date : 23 November 2021. https://ranzco.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/RANZCO-Guidelines_Ophthalmologists-and-Trainees-Interactions-with-the-Medical-Industry_2021.pdf