Postoperative Analgesia in Breast Cancer Surgery: Efficiency and Safety of Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block, a randomized controlled double blinded trial

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Maryem Ben Amor
Sofiene Ben Marzouk
Salma Souihli
Bochra Fouzai
Feryel Ben Amor
Hayen Magherbi

Abstract

Introduction: Breast cancer surgeries are the mainstay and usually the first step of treatment. Aim : To assess the efficiency and safety of ultrasound guided Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) for the management of postoperative pain in patients undergoing elective breast cancer surgery.


Methods: Between December 2018 and June 2019, a prospective, controlled, randomized, double-blinded study was conducted at the maternity and neonatology center of Tunis. We included fifty ASA I-II female patients who were scheduled for elective breast cancer surgery. They were randomly divided into two groups : Group R (n=25) with Ropivacaine, while Group P (n=25) received a placebo. The study recorded PCA morphine consumption and patient demand for PCA. The primary outcome was to compare the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores at various points throughout the 24 hours postoperatively (1st, 2nd, 4th, 8th, 12th, 16th, 20th, 24th) between the two groups. 


Results : Except for the first hour and 16th hour post-surgery, the mean VAS pain scores were significantly lower in Group R compared to Group P. The 24-hour morphine consumption was significantly lower in Group R (5.5±0.9 mg) compared to Group P (16.6±2.8 mg); p<0.001. Per-operative fentanyl consumption was also significantly lower in Group R (9.1±4.2 mcg; Group P: 50±9.1 mcg; p< 0.001).  Moreover, the mean total morphine demand was significantly lower in Group R. 


Conclusion : ESPB with Ropivacaine is effective and safe for pain management after breast cancer surgery with a consequent morphine sparing and less use of systemic analgesia.

Keywords:

Breast cancer, analgesia, Ropivacaine, erector spinae

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Miller K, Nogueira L, Mariotto A, Rowland J, Yabroff K, Alfano C, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(5):363-85.
  2. Riedel F, Hennigs A, Hug S, Schaefgen B, Sohn C, Schuetz F, et al. Is mastectomy oncologically safer than breast-conserving treatment in early breast cancer? Breast Care. 2017;12(6):385-90.
  3. Poleshuck E, Katz J, Andrus C, Hogan L, Jung B, Kulick D, et al. Risk factors for chronic pain following breast cancer surgery: a prospective study. J Pain. 2006;7(9):626-34.
  4. Woodworth GE, Ivie RJ, Nelson SM, Walker CM, Maniker RB. Perioperative breast analgesia: a qualitative review of anatomy and regional techniques. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017;42(5):609-31.
  5. Tahiri Y, Tran DH, Bouteaud J, Xu L, Lalonde D, Luc M, et al. General anaesthesia versus thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery: a meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64(10):1261-9.
  6. Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The erector spinae plane block: a novel analgesic technique in thoracic neuropathic pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41(5):621-7.
  7. Yang HM, Choi YJ, Kwon HJ, O J, Cho TH, Kim SH. Comparison of injectate spread and nerve involvement between retrolaminar and erector spinae plane blocks in the thoracic region: a cadaveric study. Anaesthesia. 2018;73(10):1244-50.
  8. Vidal E, Giménez H, Forero M, Fajardo M. Bloqueo del plano del músculo erector espinal: estudio anatómico-cadavérico para determinar su mecanismo de acción. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2018;65(9):514-9.
  9. Ivanusic J, Konishi Y, Barrington MJ. A cadaveric study investigating the mechanism of action of erector spinae blockade. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43(6):567-71.
  10. Adhikary SD, Bernard S, Lopez H, Chin KJ. Erector spinae plane block versus retrolaminar block: a magnetic resonance imaging and anatomical study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43(7):756-762.
  11. Schwartzmann A, Peng P, Maciel MA, Forero M. Mechanism of the erector spinae plane block: insights from a magnetic resonance imaging study. Can J Anaesth. 2018;65(10):1165-6.
  12. Ueshima H, Otake H. Limitations of the erector spinae plane (ESP) block for radical mastectomy. J Clin Anesth. 2018;51:97.
  13. Altıparmak B, Korkmaz Toker M, Uysal Aİ, Gümüş Demirbilek S. Comparison of the efficacy of erector spinae plane block performed with different concentrations of bupivacaine on postoperative analgesia after mastectomy surgery: ramdomized, prospective, double blinded trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019;19(1):31.
  14. Josh Luftig P, Mantuani D, Herring AA, Dixon B, Clattenburg E, Nagdev A. The authors reply to the optimal dose and volume of local anesthetic for erector spinae plane blockade for posterior rib fractures. Am J Emerg Med. 2018;36(6):1103-4.
  15. Gad M, Abdelwahab K, Abdallah A, Abdelkhalek M, Abdelaziz M. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block compared to modified pectoral plane block for modified radical mastectomy operations. Anesth Essays Res. 2019;13(2):334-9.
  16. Hong B, Bang S, Chung W, Yoo S, Chung J, Kim S. Multimodal analgesia with multiple intermittent doses of erector spinae plane block through a catheter after total mastectomy: a retrospective observational study. Korean J Pain. 2019;32(3):206-14.
  17. Singh S, Chowdhary NK. Erector spinae plane block an effective block for post-operative analgesia in modified radical mastectomy. Indian J Anaesth. 2018;62(2):148-50.
  18. Gürkan Y, Aksu C, Kuş A, Yörükoğlu UH, Kılıç CT. Ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block reduces postoperative opioid consumption following breast surgery: a randomized controlled study. J Clin Anesth. 2018;50:65-8.
  19. Aksu C, Kuş A, Yörükoğlu HU, Tor Kılıç C, Gürkan Y. Analgesic effect of the bi-level injection erector spinae plane block after breast surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Agri. 2019;31(3):132-7.
  20. Oksuz G, Bilgen F, Arslan M, Duman Y, Urfalıoglu A, Bilal B. Ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae block versus tumescent anesthesia for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing reduction mammoplasty: a randomized controlled study. Aesth Plast Surg. 2019;43(2):291-6.
  21. Kumar A, Hulsey A, Martinez Wilson H, Kim J, Gadsden J. The use of liposomal bupivacaine in erector spinae plane block to minimize opioid consumption for breast surgery: a case report. AA Practice. 2018;10(9):239-41.
  22. Tanaka N, Ueshima H, Otake H. Erector spinae plane block for combined lovectomy and radical mastectomys. J Clin Anesth. 2018;45:27-8.
  23. Ueshima H. Pneumothorax after the erector spinae plane block. J Clin Anesth. 2018;48:12.
  24. Selvi O, Tulgar S. Ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block as a cause of unintended motor block. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2018;65(10):589-92.
  25. Tulgar S, Selvi O, Senturk O, Serifsoy T, Thomas D. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block: indications, complications, and effects on acute and chronic pain based on a single-center experience. Cureus. 2019;11(1):e3815.