The challenge of periimplantitis management: a case report

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Jul 13, 2022
Download
pdf
Vol. 100 No. 7 (2022): Issue Jul 2022

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Ghita Kadri
Oum Keltoum Ennibi
Zouheir Ismaili

Abstract

Introduction: Implant therapy has changed tremendously the management of edentulism, and are a real alternative to conventional
prosthesis. However, with the constant increase of the number of peri-implantitis, the question of therapeutic management arises.
The first goal of the treatment is to control the infection, which requires periodontal debridement and decontamination of the implant
surface. Secondary objectives are to promote bone regeneration and repair of the attachment around the implant.

Case report: The patient was a 24-years-old female in good general health with no history of smoking. Intraoral and radiological examination
revealed a peri-implantitis around the implant at the site of tooth 14. The peri-implantitis management involved a non-surgical treatment to reduce
inflammation, followed by surgical treatment of the bone defect. This combined decontamination of the implant surface and bone regeneration.

Conclusion: The heterogeneity of the surgical protocols does not suggest any true recommendations. Several treatments for periimplantitis are currently implemented. However, we still lack relevant data regarding the effectiveness of these therapies.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Chan HL, Lin GH,Suarez F et al. Surgical management of peri-implantitis: A systematic review and metaanalysis of treatment outcomes. J Periodontol. 2014; 85 (8): 1027-41.doi: 10.1902/jop.2013.130563.
  2. Berglundh T, Armitage G, Araujo MG et al. Peri-implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Periodontol. 2018; 89 (1 Suppl) :S313-S318. doi: 10.1002/JPER.17-0739.
  3. Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DG et al. The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. Headache. 2013; 53 (10):1541- 7. doi: 10.1111/head.12246.
  4. Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Needkleman I, Giovanni ES. Consenus Statements and Clinical Recommendations for prevention and Management of biologic and technical implant complications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; (29 Suppl) :346-50. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2013.g5.
  5. Bouchard P, Frémont M, Sanz M. Parodontologie & dentisterie implantaire. Volume 1 : Médecine parodontale. Paris : Lavoisier Médecine Sciences 2014.
  6. Padial-Molina M, Suarez F, Rios HF et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis of peri-implant diseases. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014; 34(6): e102-11. doi: 10.11607/prd.1994.
  7. Schwarz F, Becker K, Sager M. Efficacy of professionally administered plaque removal with or without adjunctive measures for the treatment of peri- implant mucositis. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2015; 42(16 Suppl): S202- 13. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12349.
  8. Mombelli A, Walter C. Antibiotics in Periodontics. wiss Dent J. 2019;129(10):835-838.
  9. Tosun E, Tasar F, Strauss R et al. Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Effects of Er:YAG, Diode, and CO2 Lasers on Titanium Discs: An Experimental Study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70(5):1064-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.11.021.
  10. . Daugela P, Cicciù M, Saulacic N. Surgical Regenerative Treatments for Peri-Implantitis: Meta-analysis of Recent Findings in a Systematic Literature Review. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2016; 7(3): e15. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2016.7315.