How to assess heterogeneity for a meta-analysis?

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Apr 30, 2022
Download
pdf
Vol. 100 No. 5 (2022): Issue Mai 2022

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Chadli Dziri

Keywords:

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Turki F, Louati N, Kamoun H, Keskes L, Rebaii T, Frikha R. Updatemeta-analysis from biomedical literature about MTHFR’polymorphisms and the CML’ risk. Tunis Med. 2022 ; Vol 100 (04) : 285-294.
  2. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in Meta-Analysis. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557-60. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557. PMID: 12958120; PMCID: PMC192859.
  3. Borenstein M, Higgins JP, Hedges LV, Rothstein HR. Basics of Meta-Analysis: I2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity. Res Synth Methods. 2017;8(1):5-18. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1230. Epub 2017 Jan 6. PMID: 28058794.
  4. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, RothsteinHR. Introduction to meta-analysis, second edition, Prediction Intervals (chapter 17) - Oxford, John Wiley & Sons Ltd 2021: 119-125
  5. Borenstein M, Common mistakes in meta-analysis and how to avoid them, The Prediction Interval (chapter 17) - New Jersey (USA), Biostat, Inc. 2019: 85-93
  6. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, Rothstein HR. A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods. 2010;1(2):97-111. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.12. Epub 2010 Nov 21. PMID: 26061376.