Epidemiological and therapeutic aspects of acetabular fractures in elderly
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
Introduction:Management of acetabular fracture in the elderly patients is becoming an increasingly topic of debate. Data from different parts of the world specified particularities of their patients.
Aim: To describe patterns of these fractures in the Tunisian patients aged > 60, which can contribute to management and preventive plans.
Methods: We performed a retrospective review from 1997 to 2016 treated at the Charles Nicolle university hospital. Information regarding demographics, co morbidities, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score (ISS), types and levels of injury, treatment type, and mortality were collected.
Results: The mean age of our patients was 68,6 years (range 60–94 years). The male to female ratio was 3:85.Main causes were motor vehicle accident. Most of our patients were in good health. The associated lesions were very frequent and present in 64.7% of cases with a clear predominance of cranio-fascial trauma, with a median of the ISS score at 11. According to the Judet and Letournel classification, 18 elementary fractures and 16 complex fractures were reported with predominance of the anterior column-posterior hemitransverse fracture pattern. Posterior wall fracture in the elderly is often associated with comminution and / or marginal impaction and / or posterior dislocation of the hip. Fractures of the anterior segment are often associated with hip protrusion and / or quadrilateral plate involvement and / or the superomedial roof impaction or "Gull sign".
Conclusion: As our population continues to age, traumatic acetabular fractures will become more prevalent. Appropriate screening strategies, treatment and prevention plans will need to be developed to improve outcomes in this devastating injury.
Keywords:
fracture, acetabulum, elderly, epidemiology##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
References
- Références : 1. Cornell CN. Hip fractures in the elderly: on the acetabular side. Orthopedics. 2004;27(9):931-2. 2. Mears DC. Surgical treatment of acetabular fractures in elderly patients with osteoporotic bone.J Am AcadOrthop Surg. 1999;7(2):128-41. 3. Vanderschot P. Treatment options of pelvic and acetabular fractures in patients with osteoporotic bone. Injury. 2007;38(4):497-508. 4. Culemann U, Holstein JH, Kohler D, Tzioupis CC, Pizanis A, Tosounidis G, et al. Different stabilisation techniques for typical acetabular fractures in the elderly: a biomechanical assessment. Injury. 2010;41(4):405-10. 5. Johnell O, Kanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(12):1726-33. 6. Borrelli J, Jr., Goldfarb C, Catalano L, Evanoff BA. Assessment of articular fragment displacement in acetabular fractures: a comparison of computerized tomography and plain radiographs. J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16(7):449-56; discussion 56-7. 7. Tornkvist H, Schatzker J. Acetabular fractures in the elderly: an easily missed diagnosis. J Orthop Trauma. 1993;7(3):233-5. 8. Ferguson TA, Patel R, Bhandari M, Matta JM. Fractures of the acetabulum in patients aged 60 years and older: an epidemiological and radiological study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92(2):250-7. 9. Jain R, Basinski A, Kreder HJ. Nonoperative treatment of hip fractures.IntOrthop. 2003;27(1):11-7. 10. Buller LT, Lawrie CM, Vilella FE. A growing problem: acetabular fractures in the elderly and the combined hip procedure. OrthopClin North Am. 2015;46(2):215-25. 11. Letournel E. Surgical treatment of fractures of the acetabulum: results over a twenty-five