Scientific Medical Writing in Practice: the «IMR@D®» Format

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Aug 15, 2019
Download
pdf
Vol. 97 No. 3 (2019): Issue Mar 2019

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Helmi Ben Saad

Abstract

Introduction. The quality of an original scientific paper (OSP) depends on compliance with the principles of scientific medical writing. This review aimed to enlighten the authors on the roles, organization, mistakes to be avoided and recommendations, related to the structure of an OSP.
Methods. Narrative review of the literature regarding the structure adopted when drafting an OSP.
Results. The format "IMR@D®" (Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, and citationsRaws) is now, and will remain, the guiding structure of the majority of OSPs published in biomedical scientific journals. The "Introduction" section is the answer to the question: what is the problem? It describes the reasoning, the purposes and the objectives of the study and concisely describes the study hypothesis. The "Methods" section is the answer to the question: how did the author try to solve the problem? It specifies the study design, the selection process, the applied procedures, the data collected, and the type of statistical analysis that will be performed to confirm/refute the research hypothesis. The section "Results" is the answer to the interrogation: what have the author found? It presents the descriptive and the analytical data of the study. The "Discussion" section is the answer to the question: what difference does it make? It interpreted the results and compared them with these reported in the literature. The "citationsRaws" section is the answer to the question: what have the author consulted? It clearly explains what is not based on information derived from the study, and provides means to verify that cited statements have been really recorded in the literature.
Conclusion. The "IMR@D®" format should make the scientific medical writing more pleasant while increasing the possibility that the OSP is accepted for publication.

Keywords:

ICMJE, Manuscript, Medicine, Structure

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Cuschieri S, Grech V, Savona-Ventura C. WASP (write a scientific paper): Structuring a scientific paper. Early Hum Dev 2019;128:114-7.
  2. Hoogenboom BJ, Manske RC. How to write a scientific article. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2012;7(5):512-7.
  3. Pakes GE. Writing manuscripts describing clinical trials: a guide for pharmacotherapeutic researchers. Ann Pharmacother 2001;35:770-9.
  4. Ben Saad H. Scientific medical writing in practice: how to succeed the writing style? Tunis Med 2019; “97(02):273-85”.
  5. Shah J. Some rules for writing medical articles for peer-reviewed journals. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2015;97:252-4.
  6. Brandon D, McGrath JM. Writing a research article. Adv Neonatal Care 2015;15:159-61.
  7. Roush K. Writing your manuscript: structure and style. Am J Nurs 2017;117:56-61.
  8. International Commitee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. 2018. Téléchargeable: www.icmje.org. Dernière visite le 19.02.2019.
  9. Mitchell P. IMRaD heresy. Br J Neurosurg 2017;31:117-8.
  10. Masic I. How to write an efficient discussion? Med Arch 2018;72:306-7.
  11. Cals JW, Kotz D. Effective writing and publishing scientific papers, part VI: discussion. J Clin Epidemiol 2013;66:1064.
  12. Ng KH, Peh WC. Writing the discussion. Singapore Med J 2009;50:458-60.
  13. Cals JW, Kotz D. Effective writing and publishing scientific papers, part III: introduction. J Clin Epidemiol 2013;66:702.
  14. Kotz D, Cals JW. Effective writing and publishing scientific papers, part IV: methods. J Clin Epidemiol 2013;66:817.
  15. Cals JW, Kotz D. Effective writing and publishing scientific papers, part VIII: references. J Clin Epidemiol 2013;66:1198.
  16. Kotz D, Cals JW. Effective writing and publishing scientific papers, part VII: tables and figures. J Clin Epidemiol 2013;66:1197.
  17. Kotz D, Cals JW. Effective writing and publishing scientific papers, part V: results. J Clin Epidemiol 2013;66:945.
  18. Meadows A. The scientific paper as an archaeological artifact. J Inf Science 1985;11:27-30.
  19. Bajwa SJ, Sawhney C. Preparing manuscript: scientific writing for publication. Indian J Anaesth 2016;60:674-8.
  20. Alexandrov AV. How to write a research paper. Cerebrovasc Dis 2004;18:135-8.
  21. Sollaci LB, Pereira MG. The introduction, methods, results, and discussion (IMRAD) structure: a fifty-year survey. J Med Libr Assoc 2004;92:364-7.
  22. Vetter TR, Mascha EJ. In the beginning-there is the introduction-and your study hypothesis. Anesth Analg 2017;124:1709-11.
  23. Vickery B. The royal society scientific conference of 1948. J Documentation 1992;54:281-3.
  24. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International steering committee of medical editors. Br Med J 1978;1:1334-6.
  25. Bazerman C. Modern evolution of the experimental report in physics: spectroscopic articles in Physical Review, 1893-1980. Social Studies of Science. 1984;14:163-9.
  26. Pollock AV, Evans ME, Wiggin NJB, Balch CM. Writing your first scientific paper. In: Troidl H. editor. Principles and practice of research. 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 1991: 391-403.
  27. Mutze T, Schmidli H, Friede T. Sample size re-estimation incorporating prior information on a nuisance parameter. Pharm Stat 2018;17:126-43.
  28. Hajian-Tilaki K. Sample size estimation in diagnostic test studies of biomedical informatics. J Biomed Inform 2014;48:193-204.
  29. Delucchi KL. Sample size estimation in research with dependent measures and dichotomous outcomes. Am J Public Health 2004;94:372-7.
  30. Gupta KK, Attri JP, Singh A, Kaur H, Kaur G. Basic concepts for sample size calculation: critical step for any clinical trials! Saudi J Anaesth 2016;10:328-31.
  31. Jones SR, Carley S, Harrison M. An introduction to power and sample size estimation. Emerg Med J 2003;20:453-8.
  32. Malone HE, Nicholl H, Coyne I. Fundamentals of estimating sample size. Nurse Res 2016;23:21-5.
  33. Maxwell SE, Kelley K, Rausch JR. Sample size planning for statistical power and accuracy in parameter estimation. Annu Rev Psychol 2008;59:537-63.
  34. Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T. Sample size estimation: an overview with applications to orthodontic clinical trial designs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:e141-6.
  35. Gorard S, Gorard J. What to do instead of significance testing? Calculating the ‘number of counterfactual cases needed to disturb a finding'. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2015;19:481-90.
  36. King MT. A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2011;11:171-84.
  37. Bohannon RW, Crouch R. Minimal clinically important difference for change in 6-minute walk test distance of adults with pathology: a systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract 2017;23:377-81.
  38. Gedda M. Traduction française des lignes directrices CONSORT pour l'écriture et la lecture des essais contrôlés randomisés. Kinesither Rev 2015;15:28-33.
  39. The CONSORT statement. Téléchargeable: http://www.consort-statement.org/. Dernière visite le 22.06.2019.
  40. STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology. Téléchargeable: https://www.strobe-statement.org/index.php?id=strobe-home. Dernière visite le 22.06.2019.
  41. Gedda M. Traduction française des lignes directrices STROBE pour l'écriture et la lecture des études observationnelles. Kinesither Rev 2015;15:34-8.
  42. Siebers R, Holt S. Accuracy of references in five leading medical journals. Lancet 2000;356:1445.