Transported neonates in Tunisia

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Dec 26, 2018
Download
pdf
Vol. 96 No. 12 (2018): Issue Dec 2018

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Fatma Zohra Chioukh
Karim Ben Ameur
Kamel Monastiri
Hakima Kbaier
Sonia Blibech
Mohamed Douagi
Khaled Ben Hlel
Héchmi Ben Hamouda
Habib Soua
Amira Bouraoui
Ridha Régaieg
Abdellatif Gargouri
Imène Ksibi
Samia Kacem
Nabiha Mahdhaoui
Hédia Ayech
Hassen Sboui

Abstract

Aims: To describe the transport of sick neonates to a tertiary care hospital and evaluate their condition at arrival and outcome.
Methods: A multicenter, prospective cohort study was performed in 7 NICUs in Tunisia from 1st april to 31 July 2015.Demographic parameters, transport details and clinical features at arrival were recorded. All neonates were followed up till discharge or death.
 Results: A total of 239 consecutive neonates were enrolled in the study representing 5.7% of all admitted infants. Maternal risk factors were present in 26% of neonates admitted. Sex-ratio was 1.46. Preterm infants represented 24% of transported babies. Seventeen percent of neonates had severe respiratory distress and 10% had hemodynamic troubles. Referred hospital was not informed in 24% of cases. Regarding the transport mode, 113 newborns (47.5%) were transported in ambulance accompanied by a nurse. Documentation during transfert was present in 14% of cases. Five babies expired on arrival despite resuscitation.  Rate mortality was 8.4%.
Conclusion: Transporting neonates in developing countries is a challenge. Organized transport services in Tunisia are not always available. So, in cases of at–risk pregnancy, it is safer to transport the mother prior to delivery than to transfer the sick baby after birth.

Keywords:

Ambulance-Newborn-Neonatal transportation-Mortality.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Orr RA, Felmet KA, Han Y, McCloskey KA, Dragotta MA, Bills DM, Kuch BA, Watson RS. Pediatric specialized transport teams are associated with improved outcomes. Pediatrics 2009 Jul;124(1):40-8.
  2. Kempley ST, Sinha AK; Thames Regional Perinatal Group. Census of neonatal transfers in London and the South East of England. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004; 89: F521-6
  3. Karlsen KA, Trautman M, Price-Douglas W, Smith S. National survey of neonatal transport teams in the United States. Pediatrics 2011; 128: 685-91.
  4. Cusack J, Field D, Manktelow B..Impact of service changes on neonatal transfer patterns over 10 years. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal. 2007; 92(3):F181-4.
  5. Lorch SA, Myers S, Carr B. The Regionalization of Pediatric Health Care. Pediatrics. 2010; 126 (6):1188-90.
  6. Orr RA, Felmet KA, Han Y, McCloskey KA, Dragotta MA, Bills DM, Kuch BA, Watson RS. Pediatric Specialized Transport Teams Are Associated With Improved Outcomes. Pediatrics 2009; 124(1):40-8.
  7. Goldsmit G1, Rabasa C, Rodriguez S, Aguirre Y, Valdés M, Pretz D, Carmona D, Lopez Tornow S, Farina D. Risk factors associated to clinical deterioration during the transport of sick newborn infants. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2012;110(4):304-9.
  8. Shlossman PA, Manley JS, Sciscione AC, Colmorgen GH. An analysis of neonatal morbidity and mortality in maternal (in utero) and neonatal transports at 24-34 weeks' gestation. Am J Perinatol. 1997 Sep;14(8):449-56.
  9. Vieira AL, dos Santos AM, Okuyama MK, Miyoshi MH, de Almeida MF, Guinsburg R. Factors Associated with Clinical Complications During Intra-hospital Transports in a Neonatal Unit in Brazil. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics. 2011;57(5):368-74.