Mercurial hospital waste: management, becoming and recommendations

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Aschraf Chadli-Debbiche
Riadh Allani
Raja Jouini
Emna Abidi
Aycha Nouri
Siwar Laouini
Amine Ghrabi
Lobna Mekni
Anis Chouchene
Afef Siala-Makni
Nèbiha Borsali-Falfoul

Abstract

Introduction and Purpose : In hospitals, the use of medical instruments and products containing mercury and the management of mercury waste (MW) collected
are regulated in developed countries. In Tunisia, MW end up in landfill and no strategy has so far been adopted. The objective of this study was to quantify MW in
two university hospitals in Tunis and to indicate the elimination pathways used and to propose certain recommendations.
Methods : This was a descriptive retrospective study conducted from February to August 2016 and quantifying the MWs from medical products and instruments
used by two university hospitals in Tunis during 2015. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups enabled the collection of informations on MW management
methods for these products and instruments and their waste and to identify the weaknesses of this management.
Results : In 2015, 2,443 mercury thermometers were used by Habib Thameur hospital (HHT) and 7,439 by La Rabta hospital (HLR), releasing 19,764 g of mercury.
For dental amalgams, 1,440 g were used at HHT. Their residues (320.4 g) were stored in the original capsules. At HLR, 1,320 g were used but residues, estimated
at one-third of the total amount (440g), were discharged into the cuspidor. The total amount released from the amalgams was 380.2g, knowing that half of the volume
was mercury. The broken tensiometers (26 at HHT and 113 at HLR) released 183.5g of mercury, the roasted fluorescent lamps (1,627 at HHT and 1,722 at the HLR)
167.4g, Harris Hematoxylin (15 liters at HHT and 18 liters at HLR) 82.5g and used batteries (1,258 at the HHT and 914 at the HLR) 54,3g. In total, with the exception
of mercury vapors, the amount of mercury released in 2015 at the two hospitals was approximately 20,632 g. These MW have borrowed the household waste stream
(51% of HHT MW and 47% of HLR MW), waste from infectious care activities (47% HHT and 46% of the HLR MW), electrical and electronic waste (1% of HHT and
HLR MW), and sewage (1% of HHT MW and 6% of the HLR MW).
Conclusion : The main supplier of hospital MW is the mercury thermometer (95.8%). The managerial authorities would benefit from the promulgation of a regulatory
framework, like the European law of 1998, prohibiting their use on a territorial scale and, by subsidies, replace them with electronic thermometers.

Keywords:

Mercury - Methylmercury exposure - Risk - Bioaccumulation - Dental amalgam - Mercury thermometer - Mercury tensiometer - Fluorescent lamp - Battery

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Programme des nations unies pour l'environnement. Etude du mercure dans les pays méditerranéens. Larnaca (Chypre);24-25 février 2011. UNEP(DEPI)/MED WG.352/3.
  2. La commission de la sécurité des consommateurs (France). Avis relatif à la toxicité des thermomètres à mercure et aux modes alternatifs de prise de température corporelle. Paris: Ministère des Finances;1998. Accessible à : www.finances.gouv.fr/Securite_consommateurs/index.html
  3. Le mercure des amalgames dentaires est-il toxique ? [editorial]. Accessible à : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxac.2014.10.001
  4. Direction générale de l'amélioration du cadre de vie (Burkina Faso). Rapport de l'inventaire national des sources de production, d'utilisations et de rejets du mercure dans l'environnement au Burkina Faso. Burkina Faso: Ministère de l'environnement et du cadre de vie;2007. p. 52.
  5. Caravati EM, Erdman AR, Christianson G, Nelson LS, Woolf AD, Booze LL, et al. Elemental mercury exposure : an evidence-based consensus guideline for out-of-hospital management. Clin Toxicol. 2008;46:1-21.
  6. Gautier P, Jollès G. Histochimie normale et pathologique. Paris : Gauthier-Villars;1970. p. 1416.
  7. République Française. Arrêté du 24 décembre 1998 relatif à l'interdiction de mise sur le marché de thermomètres à mercure destinés à mesurer la température interne de l'homme. JORF n°303 du 31 décembre 1998. p 20169. Accessible à : www.legifrance.gouv.fr/WAspad/UnTexteDeJorf?numjo=MESH9824147A
  8. Clarkson TW, Magos L, Myers G. The toxicology of mercury-current exposures and clinical manifestations. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1731-7.
  9. Carocci A, Rovito N, Stefania-Sinicropi M, Genchi G. Mercury toxicity and neurodegenerative effects. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 2014;229:1-17.
  10. Clarkson TW, Vyas JB, Ballatori N. Mechanisms of mercury disposition in the body. Am J Ind Med. 2007;50:757-64.
  11. Compeau GC, Bartha R. Sulfate-reducing bacteria: principal methylators of mercury in anoxic estuarine sediment. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985;50:498-502.
  12. Dafre AL, Farina M. Methyl mercury neurotoxicity is associated with inhibition of the antioxidant enzyme glutathione peroxidase. Free Radic Biol Med. 2009;47:449-57.
  13. Goyer RA, Clarkson TW. Toxic effects of metals. In: Klaassen CD (ed) Casarett and Doull'stoxicology: the basic science of poisons, 6th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York. 2001;811-67.
  14. Grandjean P, Herz KT. Methyl mercury and brain development: imprecision and underestimation of developmental neurotoxicity in humans. Mt Sinai J Med. 2011;78:107-18.
  15. Llop S, Ballester F, Murcia M, Forns J, Tardon A, Andiarena A, et al. Prenatal exposure to mercury and neuropsychological development in young children: the role of fish consumption. Int J Epidemiol. 2016. [Epubahead of print].
  16. Van Wijngaarden E, Thurston SW, Myers GJ, Harrington D, Cory-Slechta DA, Strain JJ, et al. Methyl mercury exposure and neuro-developmental outcomes in the Seychelles Child Development Study Main cohortatage 22 and 24years.Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2016 [Epubahead of print].
  17. Golding J, Gregory S, Emond A, Iles-Caven Y, Hibbeln J, Taylor CM. Prenatal mercury exposure and off spring behaviour in childhood and adolescence. Neurotoxicology. 2016. [Epubahead of print].
  18. Health Care Without Harm (HCWH) Europe, Health & Environment Alliance (HEAL). 2006.
  19. Mercure. Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire de l'environnement et du travail. Disponible à l'URL: /https://www.anses.fr/fr/content/mercure [cité le 15/06/2016].
  20. Organisation Mondiale de la Santé. Mercure et soins de santé. 2005.
  21. Association of Poison Control Centers (TESS). Toxic Exposure Surveillance System Washington (DC): American. 2005.
  22. OSPAR Commission. Mercury emissions from crematoria and their control in the OSPAR Convention Area. 2003.