Evaluation of an interactive teaching method in the teaching of Pulmonology

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Ferdaous Yangui
mehdi Charfi
Maher Abouda
Amira Ben Hmida
Mohamed Ridha Charfi

Abstract

Introduction: For several years, interactive teaching has proved its effectiveness in learning. At the Faculty of Medicine of Tunis (FMT), the
interactive sessions are sessions of clarification, illustration, application, and participation (CIAP).
Aim: To evaluate pneumology CIAP session in the acquisition of learning by first-year students of the second cycle of medical studies (SCMS1)
Methods: It was a cross-sectional study carried out at the FMT during the academic year 2016-2017 and included students from SCMS1. CIAP
session subject was "The chronic respiratory failure". A pre-test and a post-test, with the same subject, were distributed during the session.
Knowledge acquisition was evaluated by comparing the scores assigned to the tests. An evaluation of the students' satisfaction with the session
progress was made.
Results: Ten students attended the CIAP session. The mean score of the pre-test was 2.1 ± 0.7 over 10 points. A statistically significant (p =
0.003) increase in the score was observed for the post-test, which increased to 4.8 ± 0.2. For the evaluation of the session by the students, the
best scores were assigned for the items evaluating the achievement of objectives and the facilitation of the session by the teacher (1.9
points).The lowest score was given for the item evaluating the time required for the session (1 point).
Conclusion: The interactive teaching method "CIAP" was beneficial in terms of learning, as demonstrated by the statistically significant
improvement of the post-test score compared to the pre-test and the satisfaction of the students at the end of the session. Moreover, the
involvement of all the stakeholders (students, teachers, and institutions) is necessary for the success of this teaching.

Keywords:

Teaching methods, interactive learning, medical students, formative feedback

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Mazur E. Education. Farewell, lecture? Science. 2009 Jan 2;323(5910):50-1.
  2. Krathwohl DR. A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. TheoryPract. 2002;41(4):212-218.
  3. Divaris K, Barlow PJ, Chendea SA, Cheong WS, Dounis A, Dragan IF et al. The academic environment: the students' perspective. Eur J Dent Educ Off J Assoc Dent Educ Eur. 2008 Feb;12 Suppl 1:120-30.
  4. Samuelson DB, Divaris K, Kok IJD. Benefits of Case-Based versus Traditional Lecture-Based Instruction in a Preclinical Removable Prosthodontics Course. J Dent Educ. 2017 Apr 1;81(4):387-94.
  5. Chedly Tabbane. Eléments d'introduction aux ateliers de pédagogie médicale. Centre de publications universitaires; 2000.
  6. Thistlethwaite JE, Davies D, Ekeocha S, Kidd JM, MacDougall C, Matthews P et al. The effectiveness of case-based learning in health professional education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 23. Med Teach. 2012 Jun;34(6):e421-44.
  7. Parmelee DX, Hudes P. Team-based learning: A relevant strategy in health professionals' education. Med Teach. 2012 May;34(5):411-3.
  8. Ghorbani N, Karbalay-Doust S, Noorafshan A. Is a Team-based Learning Approach to Anatomy Teaching Superior to Didactic Lecturing? Sultan QaboosUniv Med J. 2014 Feb;14(1):e120-125.
  9. Chamberland M, Hivon R, Tardif J, Bedard D. Évolution du raisonnement clinique au cours d'un stage d'externat : une étude exploratoire. Pédagogie Médicale. 2001 Feb 1;2(1):9-17.
  10. Bowe CM, Voss J, Thomas Aretz H. Case method teaching: an effective approach to integrate the basic and clinical sciences in the preclinical medical curriculum. Med Teach. 2009 Sep;31(9):834-41.
  11. Marantz PR, Burton W, Steiner-Grossman P. Using the case-discussion method to teach epidemiology and biostatistics. Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll. 2003 Apr;78(4):365-71.
  12. Austin SB, Sonneville KR. Closing the “know-do” gap: training public health professionals in eating disorders prevention via case-method teaching. Int J EatDisord. 2013 Jul;46(5):533-7.
  13. Rangachari PK. Active learning: in context. Am J Physiol. 1995 Jun;268(6 Pt 3):S75-80.
  14. Scallon G. L'évaluation formative. De Boeck Université; 2000. 449 p.