Analysis of prognostic factors of nephroblastoma in a tunisian cohort

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Raoudha Doghri
Asma Aloui
Yosra Berrazaga
Nadia Boujelbene
Maha Driss
Imen Abess
Faten Fdhila
Lamia Charfi
Amel Mezlini
Karima Mrad

Abstract

Background: Nephroblastoma is the most common childhood abdominal malignancy. Many studies allowed a better understanding of prognostic
factors and they permitted to adapt treatment according to a risk stratification approach.
Aim: To assess the most significant factors influencing the survival of patients presenting nephroblastoma.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective study over a 10-year period between 2001 and 2010 including 42 nephrectomy specimens, assessed in
the pathology department of Salah Azaiz Institute, from all children diagnosed with nephroblastoma.
The tumors were subdivided into histological subtypes and histological risk groups according to the SIOP-2001 classification. Statistical analyses
were performed using the Kaplan-Meir and the Cox regression methods.
Results: The median age was 38 months. The mixed type was the most common (40% of cases). The tumors were subdivided into intermediate
histological risk group (81%) and high risk group (14%). The tumors were classified as stage I (38%), stage II (24%), stage III (9%), stage IV (17%)
and stage V (12%). The four-year survival rate was 83% and the event free survival rate was 85%. Age, laterality, histological risk group, tumor
volume, blastema volume, stage, capsular rupture and incomplete resection had a significant impact on survival. Predictive factors of relapse were:
laterality, tumor volume, blastema volume, histological risk group, stage, capsular rupture and incomplete resection.
Conclusion: Histological type and stage were identified as the most important prognostic factors in nephroblastoma. Further large studies are
needed to establish the impact of absolute blastemal volume.

Keywords:

Nephroblastoma, Histopronostic factors, Histology, surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, blastemal component

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Green DM, Coppes MJ, Breslow NE et al. Wilms tumor. In: Pizzo PA, Poplack DG, editors. Principles and practice in pediatric pncology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers 1997. pp. 733-59
  2. Breslow NE, Langholz B. Childhood cancer incidence: geographical and temporal variations. Int J Cancer 1938; 32:703-716.
  3. Graf N, Tournade MF, Kraker J. The role of preoperative chemotherapy in the management of Wilmstumor: the SIOP Studies. UrolClin North Am 2000 Aug;27(3):443-454.
  4. Jan Godzinski.The current status of treatment of Wilms' tumor as per the SIOP trials.J Indian AssocPediatrSurg2015 Jan-Mar; 20(1): 16-20.
  5. Vujanić GM, Sandstedt B, Harms D, Kelsey A, Leuschner I, de Kraker J .Revised International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) working classification of renal tumors of childhood.Med PediatrOncol2002 Feb;38(2):79-82.
  6. Weirich A, Leuschner I, Harms D et al .(2001) Clinical impact of histologic subtypes in localized non-anaplastic nephroblastoma treated according to the trial and study SIOP-9/GPOH. Ann Oncol2001 Mar;12(3):311-9.
  7. Reinhard H, Aliani S, Ruebe C, Stöckle M, LeuschnerI,GrafN.Wilms' tumor in adults: results of the Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOP) 93-01/Society for Pediatric Oncology and Hematology (GPOH) Study.J ClinOncol2004 Nov 15;22(22):4500-6.
  8. Boccon-Gibod L, Rey A, Sandstedt B etal.Complete necrosis induced by preoperative chemotherapy in Wilms tumor as an indicator of low risk: report of the international society of paediatric oncology (SIOP) nephroblastoma trial and study 9. Med PediatrOncol2000 Mar;34(3):183-90.
  9. Verschuur AC, Vujanic GM, Van Tinteren H, Jones KP, De Kraker J, Sandstedt B. Stromal and epithelial predominant Wilmstumours have an excellent outcome: the SIOP 93 01 experience.Pediatr Blood Cancer 2010 Aug;55(2):233-8.doi: 10.1002/pbc.22496.
  10. Niedzielski J, Taran K, MÅ‚ynarski W, Sitkiewicz A.Is the SIOP-2001 Classification of Renal Tumors of Childhood accurate with regard to prognosis? A problem revisited. Arch Med Sci2012 Sep 8;8(4):684-9. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2012.30292.
  11. Weirich A, Ludwig R, Graf N et al. Survival in nephroblastoma treated according to the trial and study SIOP-9/GPOH with respect to relapse and morbidity.AnnOncol. 2004 May;15(5):808-20.
  12. Graf N, van Tinteren H, Pritchard-Jones K, et al. Is the absolute blastema volume after preoperative chemotherapy in nephroblastoma relevant for prognosis? Pediatr Blood Cancer 2011;57:741-742.
  13. Dome JS, Perlman EJ, Graf N.Risk Stratification for Wilms Tumor: Current Approach and Future Directions. Am SocClinOncolEduc Book. 2014:215-23. doi: 10.14694/EdBook_AM.2014.34.215.
  14. Zhuge Y, Cheung MC, Yang R, Koniaris LG, Neville HL, Sola JE.Improved survival with lymph node sampling in wilms tumor. JSurg Res 2011 May 15;167(2):199-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.12.026. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
  15. Kieran K, Anderson JR, Dome JS etal.Lymph node involvement in Wilms tumor: results from National Wilms Tumor Studies 4 and 5. J PediatrSurg2012 Apr;47(4):700-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.08.017.
  16. De Kraker J, Graf N, Pritchard-Jones K, Pein F. Nephroblastoma clinical trial and study SIOP 2001, Protocol. SIOP RTSG 2001.
  17. Moreira C, Nachef M N, Ziamati S etal.Treatment of Nephroblastoma in Africa: Results of the First French African Pediatric Oncology Group (GFAOP) Study. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2012; 58:37-42.
  18. Eric J. Gratias, Lawrence J. Jennings, James R. Anderson, Jeffrey S. Dome, Paul Grundy, Elizabeth J. Perlman..Gain of 1q is associated with inferior event-free and overall survival in patients with favorable histology Wilms tumor: A report from the Children's Oncology Group.Cancer2013 Nov 1; 119(21): 3887-3894. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28239
  19. PerlmanEJ, Grundy PE, AndersonJRet al .WT1 Mutation and 11P15 Loss of Heterozygosity Predict Relapse in Very Low-Risk Wilms Tumors Treated With Surgery Alone: A Children's Oncology Group Study.JClinOncol 2011;29:698-703.