Evaluation of a CIAP session for students in Medicine, Pediatrics module

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Manel Jellouli
Emira Ben Hamida
Yousra Hammi
Meriem Ferjani
Tahar Gargah

Abstract

Background: Teaching by the Clarification, Illustration, Application and Participation of Students (CIAP) approach is a method of participatory pedagogy that helps active learning to help the learner understand and integrate the new Knowledge to be able to apply them. The objectives of this work were to describe the conduct of a CIAP session and to evaluate this method of learning among students.
Methods:The session took place in a room in the Forensic Medicine Department of the Charles Nicolle Hospital in Tunis on April 18, 2017 for 60 minutes. Our population was made up of DCEM2 students undergoing pediatrics and neonatology at the Charles Nicolle Hospital. The chosen topic was post-infectious acute glomerulonephritis. The assessment consisted in a written test given at baseline before the teaching sessions and repeated immediately afterwards. Students were also asked to grade the quality of the teaching received.
Results: In total, 13/22 students were present. Clarifications were given at the request of the students. The illustration showed capillary proliferation and extra-capillary proliferation. Clinical cases have sparked a lot of interaction. All the students participated in the session: seven of them participated actively, the other six were solicited to participate. Pre-test scores varied from 2/10 to 7/10. Post-test scores ranged from 4/10 to 10/10. The mean score for the pre-test was 4.61 ± 1.6 and, the mean score for the post-test was 8.23 ± 2.31 / 10, the difference being statistically significant (p = 0.03). For students, the choices of educational objectives were relevant and were achieved, the session was coherent with the professional reality and brought new knowledge. The majority of students felt that there was good interaction. All students were satisfied with listening to the teacher and her answers to their questions. All students reported that the CIAP session provided them with a better clarification of the theoretical course, a sufficient illustration, and enabled them to participate actively in teaching. The students reported that there was a good application of the theoretical course.
Conclusion: The CIAP session improved student knowledge. The students were generally satisfied with this teaching.
 

Keywords:

Students- Medecine-Learning

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Tabbene C. Eléments d'Introduction aux ateliers de Pédagogie Médicale. Centre De Publication Universitaire, 2000.
  2. Tyler RW. Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1949.
  3. Guilbert JJ. Guide pédagogique pour les personnels de santé. Genève : Publication de l'Organisation Mondiale de la Santé, 1990.
  4. McGaghie WC, Miller GE, Sajid AW, Telder TV. Introduction à un enseignement médical fondé sur l'acquisition de compétences. Genève : Publication de l'Organisation Mondiale de la Santé, 1978.
  5. Jean P. Pour une planification méthodique des activités de formation. Pédagogie médicale. 2001; 2 :101-107.
  6. Bernard JL, Reyes P. Apprendre, en médecine. Pédagogie médicale. 2001 ;2 :163-9.
  7. Chamberland M, Hivon R. Les compétences de l'enseignant clinicien et le modèle de rôle en formation clinique. Pédagogie médicale. 2005; 6 : 98-111.
  8. Dehaan E, Appels B, Aleman A et Postma. Inter and intramodal encoding of auditory and visual presentation of material: effect on memory performance. Psychological record. 2000;50:577-86.
  9. Baxter GP, Elder AD, Glaser R. Knowledge-based cognition and performance assessment in the science classement. EducPsychol. 1996 ; 31 : 133-140.
  10. Demeester A, Vanpee D, Marchand C, Eymard C. Pédagogie Médicale. 2010; 11 : 81-95
  11. Bar RB, Tagg J. From Teaching to Learning. Change.1995 ; 27 : 13-25.
  12. Kaufman DK. L'éducation centrée sur l'enseignant ou centrée sur l'apprenant : une fausse dichotomie. Pédagogie médicale. 2002 ; 3 : 145-147.