Laparoscopy for perforated duodenal ulcer: A morbidity score based on a cohort study of 384 patients

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Zeineb Mzoughi
Seiffedine Baccouche
Hayfa Romdhane
Houssem Fadhl
Houcem Smati
Ghofrane Talbi
Mohamed Tahar Khalfallah

Abstract

Background: The Laparoscopic treatment of perforated ulcer is accompanied by a lesser morbidity and mortality compared with treatment by laparotomy. However, the morbidity of the laparoscopic approach is not nil (4%). It is influenced by pre and intraoperative factors.
The aim of our work is to establish a morbidity score in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for acute peritonitis with perforated duodenal ulcer.
Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted in a General Surgery Department. We included 384 cases of perforated duodenal ulcer operated laparoscopically over a fourteen-year period ranging from January 2000 to December 2014.
We conducted a multivariate logistical regression analysis by step-by-step-descending method. From these independent factors we established a score using the ROC curves. The threshold with the best sensitivity and specificity for predicting morbidity was investigated. In all statistical tests, the significance level was set at 0.05.
Results: The overall morbidity rate of our patients was 3.38% (13 patients). Multivariate analysis has identified five independent morbidity risk factors: temperature higher than 37.6° C, renal failure, age> 45 years, a number of stitches of two or higher and operating time to 75 minutes or longer. Our morbidity score took into account these 5 factors by integrating the intrinsic value of each factor. The threshold of the score having the best torque sensitivity specificity to predict morbidity was 10.
Conclusion: A morbidity score for perforated duodenal ulcer surgery performed by laparoscopy may be useful to organize the post-operativecare of these patients usually young and active. A lower score than the threshold predictive of morbidity could allow a rapid rehabilitation of these patients and a one day hospitalization management.

Keywords:

Ulcer-peritonitis-perforated-morbidiy-score-duodenum

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Wadaani HA. Emergent laparoscopy in treatment of perforated peptic ulcer: a local experience from tertiary centre in Saudi Arabia. World J EmergSurg 2013 Mar 8;8(1):10
  2. Zhou C, Wang W, Wang J, Zhang X, Zhang Q, Li B.An Updated Meta-Analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Repair for Perforated Peptic Ulcer.SciRep. 2015 Sep 9;5:13976.
  3. Chayla PL, Mabula JB, Koy M, McHembe MD, Jaka HM, Kabangila R et al .Clinical profile and outcome of surgical treatment of perforated peptic ulcers in Northwestern Tanzania : A tertiary hospital World J EmergSurg 2011 Aug 26 ;6 :31
  4. Unver M, Firat O, Unalp OV, Uguz A, Gumus T, Sezer TO, Ozturk S, Yoldas T, Ersin S, Guler A. Prognostic factors in peptic ulcer perforations: a retrospective 14-year study.Int Surg. 2015 May;100(5):942-8
  5. Tas I, Ulger BV, Onder A, Kapan M, Bozdag Z. Risk factors influencing morbidity and mortality in perforated peptic ulcer disease. UlusCerrahiDerg. 2014 Oct 20;31(1):20-5
  6. Menekse E, Kocer B, Topcu R, Olmez A, Tez M, Kayaalp. A practical scoring system to predict mortality in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.World J EmergSurg 2015 Feb 21;10:7.
  7. Boey J, Choi SK, Poon A, Alagaratnam TT, Risk stratification in perforated peptid ulcer disease.Prospective validaion of predictivefactors.AnnSurg 1987,205(1) :22-6
  8. Altaca G, Sayek I, Onat D, Cakmakci M, Kamiloglu S: Risk factors in perforated peptic ulcer disease: comparison of a new score system with the Mannheim Peritonitis Index. Eur J Surg 1992, 158(4):217-221.
  9. Mishra A, Sharma D, Raina VK. A simplified prognostic scoring system for peptic ulcer perforation in developing countries. Indian J Gastroenterol.2003;22:49-53.
  10. Moller MH, Engebjerg MC, Adamsen S, Bendix J, Thomsen RW. The Peptic Ulcer Perforation (PULP) score: a predictor of mortality following peptic ulcer perforation. A cohort study.ActaAnaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56:655-62.
  11. Thorsen K, Glomsaker TB, von Meer A, Soreide K, Soreide JA: Trends in diagnosis and surgical management of patients with perforated peptic ulcer. J GastrointestSurg 2011, 15(8):1329-1335.
  12. Hemmer PH, de Schipper JS, van Etten B, Pierie JP, Bonenkamp JJ, de Graaf PW, Karsten TM: Results of surgery for perforated gastroduodenal ulcers in a Dutch population. DigSurg 2011, 28(5-6):360-366.