Preoperative assessment in pulmonary resection surgery

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Nozha Ben Salah
Dorra Bejar
Houda Snene
Yacine Ouahchi
Nadia Mehiri
Bechir Louzir

Abstract

Pulmonary resection can be associated with a significant risk of morbidity and mortality, which depends on the nature and extent of pulmonary resection but also on the patient himself. This risk can be apprehended by a preoperative assessment which estimates the immediate operative risk as well as the physiological state and the post-operative quality of life which can require more conservative therapies.
Currently, preoperative exploration of a patient is based on various technological tools, which can range from simple electrocardiogram or simple spirometry to a complex exploration such as a cardiorespiratory effort test. These multiple evaluation tools require the rationalization of good practice processes according to international recommendations, taking into account the patient's specificity and the country context.
This approach makes it possible to prioritize examinations according to their availability and accessibility in order to identify patients with high operative risk and to offer them an appropriate therapeutic choice.

Keywords:

lung resection, preoperative evaluation spirometry, pulmonary diffusing capacity, exercise testing, predicted post operative product

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Brutsche MH, Spiliopoulos A, Bolliger CT, Licker M, Frey JG, Tschopp JM. Exercise capacity and extent of resection as predictors of surgical risk in lung cancer. EuropeanRespiratory Journal. 2000 May 1;15(5):828-32.
  2. Loddenkemper R, Gabler A, Göbel D. Criteria of Functional Operability in Patients with Bronchial Carcinoma : Preoperative Assessment of Risk and Prediction of Postoperative Function*. ThoraccardiovascSurg. 1983 Dec;31(06):334-7.
  3. Decker G, De Leyn P. [The pre-operative assessment of bronchial carcinoma. The surgeon'sviewpoint]. Rev Mal Respir. 2005 Sep;22(4):635-50.
  4. Beckles MA, Spiro SG, Colice GL, Rudd RM. The Physiologic Evaluation of Patients With Lung Cancer Being Considered for Resectional Surgery*. Chest. 2003 Jan 1;123(1):105S-114S.
  5. Smetana GW : Preoperative pulmonary evaluation. New Engl J Med 1999 ; 340 : 937-44
  6. Licker M, de Perrot M, Hühn L, Tschopp J-M, Robert J, Frey J-G, et al. Perioperative mortality and major cardio-pulmonary complications after lung surgery for non-small cell carcinoma. Eur J CardiothoracSurg. 1999 Mar 1;15(3):314-9.
  7. Damhuis RA, Schutte PR. Resection rates and postoperative mortality in 7,899 patients with lung cancer. EuropeanRespiratory Journal. 1996 Jan 1;9(1):7-10.
  8. Bernard A, Deschamps C, Allen MS, Miller DL, Trastek VF, Jenkins GD, et al. Pneumonectomy for malignant disease: Factors affecting early morbidity and mortality. The Journal of Thoracic and CardiovascularSurgery. 2001 Jun 1;121(6):1076-82.
  9. Gopaldas RR, Bakaeen FG, Dao TK, Walsh GL, Swisher SG, Chu D. Video-assisted thoracoscopic versus open thoracotomy lobectomy in a cohort of 13,619 patients. Ann ThoracSurg 2010;89:1563-70.
  10. Alam N, Park BJ, Wilton A, et al. Incidence and risk factors for lung injury after lung cancer resection. Ann ThoracSurg . 2007 ; 84 ( 4 ): 1085 - 1091 .
  11. British Thoracic Society and Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland Working Party : Guidelines on the selection of patients with lung cancer for surgery. Thorax 2001 ; 56 : 89-108.
  12. Bolliger CT, PerruchoudAP : Functional evaluation of the lung resection candidate. EurRespir J 1998 ; 11 : 198-212.
  13. McKenna RJ, Fischel RJ, Brenner M, Gelb AF : Combined operations for lung volume reduction surgery and lung cancer. Chest 1996 ; 110 : 885-8.
  14. SekineY ,Iwata T , Chiyo M , et al . Minimal alteration of pulmonary function after lobectomy in lung cancer patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease .Ann ThoracSurg . 2003 ; 76 ( 2 ): 356 - 361 .
  15. BrunelliA ,Refai M , Salati M , Xiumé F , Sabbatini A . P redicted versus observed FEV1 and DLCO after major lung resection: a prospective evaluation at different postoperative periods. Ann ThoracSurg . 2007 ; 83 ( 3 ): 1134 - 1139 .
  16. Edwards JG ,Duthie DJR , Waller DA . Lobar volume reduction surgery: a method of increasing the lung cancer resection rate in patients with emphysema. Thorax . 2001 ; 56 ( 10 ): 791 - 795 .
  17. DeMeesterSR , Patterson GA , Sundaresan RS , Cooper JD . L obectomy combined with volume reduction for patients with lung cancer and advanced emphysema .J ThoracCardiovascSurg . 1998 ; 115 ( 3 ): 681 - 688 .
  18. ChoongCK, MeyersBF,Battafarano RJ, et al. Lung cancer resection combined with lung volume reduction in patients with severe emphysema. J ThoracCardiovasc Surg. 2004; 127 (5): 1323 - 1331.
  19. Port JL, Kent M, Korst RJ, Lee PC, Levin MA, Flieder D, AltorkiNK : Surgical resection for lung cancer in the octogenarian. Chest 2004 ; 126 : 733-8.
  20. Karnofsky DA, Ellison RR, Golbey RB. Selection of patients for evaluation of chemotherapeutic procedures in advanced cancer. Cancer ChemotherRep. 1962 Feb;16:73-7.
  21. Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982 Dec;5(6):649-55.
  22. BrunelliA, Varela G, Salati M, et al. Recalibration of the revised cardiac risk index in lung resection candidates. Ann ThoracSurg. 2010 ; 90 (1): 199 - 203.
  23. F erguson M K, C elauroA D, V igneswaranW T. Validation of a modiï¬ed scoring system for cardiovascular risk associated with major lung resection. Eur J CardiothoracSurg. 2012 ;41(3):598-602
  24. Charloux A. Bilan cardiorespiratoire préopératoire. Rev Mal Respir. 2015 Nov;7(4):340-5.
  25. Kearney DJ, Lee TH, Reilly JJ, DeCamp MM, Sugarbaker DJ. Assessment of operative risk in patients undergoing lung resection. Importance of predictedpulmonaryfunction. Chest. 1994 Mar;105(3):753-9.
  26. Nakahara K, Monden Y, Ohno K, Miyoshi S, Maeda H, Kawashima Y. A method for predicting postoperative lung function and its relation to postoperative complications in patients with lung cancer. Ann ThoracSurg. 1985 Mar;39(3):260-5. [27]. Brunelli A , R efai M A, S alati M , S abbatini A , M organHughes N J, R occo G . C arbon monoxide lung diffusion capacity improves risk stratification in patients without airflow limitation: evidence for systematic measurement before lung resection .Eur J CardiothoracSurg. 2006 ; 29 (4): 567 - 570
  27. Brunelli A, Charloux A, Bolliger CT, Rocco G, Sculier J-P, Varela G, et al. ERS/ESTS clinical guidelines on fitness for radical therapy in lung cancer patients (surgery and chemo-radiotherapy). EurRespir J. 2009 Jul;34(1):17-41.
  28. Brunelli A, Charloux A, Bolliger CT, Rocco G, Sculier J-P, Varela G, et al. ERS/ESTS clinical guidelines on fitness for radical therapy in lung cancer patients (surgery and chemo-radiotherapy). EurRespir J. 2009 Jul;34(1):17-41.
  29. Ferguson MK, Little L, Rizzo L, Popovich KJ, Glonek GF, Leff A, ManjoneyD, Little AG: Diffusing capacity predicts morbidity and mortality after pulmonary resection. J ThoracCardiovascSurg 1988; 96: 894-900.
  30. Brunelli A, Kim AW, Berger KI, Addrizzo-Harris DJ. Physiologic evaluation of the patient with lung cancer being considered for resectional surgery: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013 May;143(5 Suppl):e166S-e190S.
  31. Berrisford R, Brunelli A, Rocco G, Treasure T, Utley M, Audit and guidelines committee of the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons, et al. The European Thoracic Surgery Database project: modelling the risk of in-hospital death following lung resection. Eur J CardiothoracSurg. 2005 Aug;28(2):306-11
  32. Morice RC, Peters EJ, Ryan MB, Putnam JB, Ali MK, Roth JA : Exercise testing in the evaluation of patients at high risk of complications from lung resection. Chest 1992 ; 101 : 356-61.
  33. Kearney DJ, Lee TH, Reilly JJ, DeCamp MM, SugarbakerDJ : Assessment of operative risk in patients undergoing lung resection : importance of predicted pulmonary function. Chest 1994 : 105 : 753-9.
  34. Markos J, Mullan BP, Hillman DR, Musk AW, Antico VF, Lovegrove FT, Carter MJ, Finucane KE : Preoperative assessment as a predictor of mortality and morbidity after lung resection. Am RevRespir Dis 1989 ; 139 : 902-10.
  35. Bolliger CT, Soler M, Stulz P, Grädel E, Müller-Brand J, Elsasser S, Gonon M, Wyser C, Perruchoud AP : Evaluation of high-risk lung resection candidates: Pulmonary haemodynamics versus exercise testing. Respiration 1994 ; 61 : 181-6
  36. Benzo R , Kelley GA , Recchi L , Hofman A , Sciurba F . C omplications of lung resection and exercise capacity: a meta-analysis .RespirMed . 2007 ; 101 ( 8 ): 1790 - 1797.
  37. Ferguson MK ,Vigneswaran WT . Diffusing capacity predicts morbidity after lung resection in patients without obstructive lung disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008; 85 (4): 1158-1164.
  38. Singh SJ , Morgan MDL , Scott S , Walters D , Hardman AE . D evelopment of a shuttle walking test of disability in patients with chronic airways obstruction. Thorax. 1 992; 4 7(12): 1019 - 1024 .
  39. Win T , Jackson A , Groves AM , Sharples LD , Charman SC , Laroche CM . Comparison of shuttle walk with measured peak oxygen consumption in patients with operable lung cancer. Thorax. 2006; 61 (1): 57- 60.
  40. Bolton JWR , Weiman DS , Haynes JL , Hornung CA , Olsen GN , Almond CH . Stairclimbing as an indicator of pulmonaryfunction. Chest. 1987 ; 92 ( 5 ): 783 - 788 .
  41. Brunelli A , Al Refai M , Monteverde M , Borri A , Salati M , Fianchini A . Stair climbing test predicts cardiopulmonary complications after lung resection. Chest. 2 002; 1 21( 4 ) : 1106 - 1110 .
  42. Olsen GN, Bolton JWR, Weiman DS, Hornung CA. Stair climbing as an exercise test to predict the postoperative complications of lung resection. Twoyears' experience. Chest. 1991 ; 99 (3): 587 - 590.
  43. Brunelli A, Xiumé F, Refai M, et al. Peak oxygen consumption measured during the stair-climbing test in lung resection candidates. Respiration. 2010; 80 (3): 207 - 211.
  44. Win T, Jackson A, Groves AM, et al. Relationship of shuttle walk test and lung cancer surgical outcome. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004; 26 (6): 1216 - 1219.
  45. Crapo RO , Casaburi R , Coates AL , et al ; ATS Committee on Proï¬ciency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories . ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J RespirCrit Care Med. 2002 ; 166 (1): 111 - 117 .
  46. Brunelli A, Charloux A, Bolliger CT, et al. ERS/ESTS clinical guidelines on ï¬tness for radical therapy in lung cancer patients (surgery and chemo-radiotherapy). EurRespir J. 2009 ;34(1):17-41
  47. Fleisher LA , Beckman JA , Brown KA , et al ; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery) ; American Society of Echocardiography; A merican Society of Nuclear Cardiology; H eart Rhythm Society; S ociety of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists ; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions ; Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology ; Society for Vascular Surgery . ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery): developed in collaboration with the American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, and Society for Vascular Surgery. Circulation. 2007 ; 116 (17): e418 - e499.
  48. Eagle KA , Berger PB , Calkins H , et al ; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1996 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery). A CC/AHA guideline update for perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery—executive summary a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1996 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery) . Circulation. 2002 ; 105 (10): 1257 - 1267.