Prevalence and risk factors of pressure ulcers in a Tunisian hospital

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Fatma Ben Mbarka
Khouloud Ben Jeddou
Mehdi Khalfallah
Dorra Jarraya
Hichem Jarraya
Zeineb Ouahchi
Ramzi Nouira
Chadli Dziri

Abstract

Background :the aim of thisstudywas to investigate the prevalence of pressure ulcers in hospitalized patients at the Charles Nicolle Hospital in Tunis, measure the risk of their occurrence, analyzepreventive and curative measuresundertaken and evaluatefactorspredisposing to pressure ulcers.
Methods: A one-day survey was performed in all hospitalized patients. Emergency services, neonatology and pediatrics were excluded. The Braden scale was used to measure the patient’s risk for the development of pressure ulcers. Analysis of risk factors was performed using SPSS version 19 software.
Results: A total of 473 patients was included. The mean age was 52.26 years. Nearly 10% of patients had a moderate or a high risk of developing pressure ulcers with a Braden score less than 18. The prevalence of patients with pressure ulcers was 5.3% with a prevalence of 4.7% of nosocomial pressure ulcer. There was no significant difference in prevalence between medical and surgical services. The prevalence was relatively more important in intensive care and general surgery. The most frequent sites were sacrum and heels. Stages 3 (46.4%) and 2 (37.5%) were the mainly stages descriped. Evaluation of management of bedsores formed revealed that half was treated with modern wound dressings. Statistical analysis revealed that a Braden score <18 is correlated with pressure ulcers ( 96% of patients with bedsores. Patients transferred from other services, patients recently operated or those with probably inadequate diet seem to be more at risk of developing pressure ulcers. In contrast, age and sex were not identified as significant risk factors.
Conclusion :pressure ulcer remains a significant problem in hospital.  This problem is preventable when applying adequate prevention but its management requires a multidisciplinary approach.

Keywords:

Pressure Ulcer. Prevalence.Risk factors

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Barrois B, Labalette C, Rousseau P et al. A national prevalence study of pressure ulcers in French hospital inpatients. J Wound Care. 2008;17:373-6,378-9.
  2. Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament. Prévention et Traitement Des Escarres de L'Adulte et du Sujet Agé : Conférence de consensus. Paris: ANSM;2001.
  3. European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Traitement des escarres: Guide De RéférenceAbrégé. Washington: EPUAP and NPUAP; 2009.
  4. Daideri G, Berthier F, Brocker P, Darmon MJ, Mignolet F, Quaranta JF, et al. L'escarre à l'hôpital en 2003 : enquête de prévalence un jour donné. RevEpidemiol Sante Publique. 2006;54:517-27.
  5. Barbut F, Parzybut B, Boëlle P-Y, Neyme D, Farid R, Kosmann M-J, et al. Escarres dans un hôpital universitaire de court séjour: Prévalence, facteurs de risque et modalités e prise en charge. PresseMéd.2006;35:769-78.
  6. Aljezawi M, Al Qadire M, Tubaishat A. Pressure ulcers in long-term care: a point prevalence study in Jordan. Br J Nurs. 2014;23:10-1.
  7. Bredesen IM, Bjoro K, Gunningberg L, Hofoss D. The prevalence, prevention and multilevel variance of pressure ulcers in Norwegian hospitals: a cross-sectional study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52:149-56.
  8. Vanderwee K, Clark M, Dealey C, Gunningberg L, Defloor T. Pressure ulcer prevalence in Europe: a pilot study. J EvalClinPract. 2007;13:227-35.
  9. Barczak CA, Barnett RI, Childs EJ, Bosley LM. Fourth National Pressure Ulcer Prevalence Survey. Adv Skin Wound Care. 1997;10:18-32.
  10. Amlung SR, Miller WL, Bosley LM. The 1999 National Pressure Ulcer Prevalence Survey: A Benchmarking Approach. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2001;14:297-301.
  11. Meehan M. National pressure ulcer prevalence survey. Adv Wound Care. 1994;7:27-30, 4,6-8.
  12. Whittington K, Patrick M, Roberts JL. A national study of pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence in acute care hospitals. Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society. 2000;27:209-15.
  13. Meehan M. Multisite Pressure Ulcer Prevalence Survey. Adv Skin Wound Care. 1990;3:14-9.
  14. Perneger TV, Héliot C, Raë A, Borst F, Gaspoz J. Hospital-acquired pressure ulcers: Risk factors and use of preventive devices. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:1940-45.
  15. Berlowitz DR, Wilking SV. Risk factors for pressure sores.A comparison of cross- sectional and cohort-derived data. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1989;37:1043-50.
  16. Feuchtinger J, Halfens RJ, Dassen T. Pressure ulcer risk factors in cardiac surgery: a review of the research literature. Heart lung. 2005;34:375-85.
  17. Lindgren. M, Unosson M, Krantz A-M, Anna-Christina. Pressure ulcer risk factors in patients undergoing surgery. J AdvNurs. 2005;50:605-12.
  18. Allman RM, Goode PS, Patrick MM, Burst N, Bartolucci AA. Pressure ulcer risk factors among hosptalized patients with activity limitation. JAMA. 1995;273:865-70.
  19. Casimiro C, Garcia-de-Lorenzo A, Usan L. Prevalence of decubitus ulcer and associated risk factors in an institutionalized Spanish elderly population. Nutrition. 2002;18:408-14.
  20. Stewart S, Box-Panksepp JS. Preventing hospital-acquired pressure ulcers: a point prevalence study. Ostomy wound manage. 2004;50:46-51.
  21. Brandeis GH, Ooi WL, Hossain M, Morris JN, Lipsitz LA. A longitudinal study of risk factors associated with the formation of pressure ulcers in nursing homes. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994;42:388-93.
  22. Keller BP, Wille J, van Ramshorst B, van der Werken C. Pressure ulcers in intensive care patients: a review of risks and prevention. J. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28:1379-88.
  23. Bergstrom N, Braden B, Kemp M, Champagne M, Ruby E. Predicting pressure ulcer risk: a multisite study of the predictive validity of the Braden Scale. Nurs Res. 1998;47:261-9.
  24. Bergstrom N, Braden BJ, Laquzza A, Holman V. The Baden scale for predicting pressure ulcer risk.Nurs Res. 1987;36:205-10.
  25. Michel JM, Willebois S, Ribinik P, Barrois B, Colin D, Passadori Y. Predictive risk factors of pressure ulcers: A review of the literature for the development of French recommendations for the clinical practice. Ann Phys Rehabil Med.2012;55:136.
  26. Perceau G, Seigneur H, Menetrier S, Lambert L, Vitry F, Bernard P. Impact d'unepolitique de prévention des escarres au chu de reims: impact of a pressure ulcer prevention policy in the reims teaching hospital. JPC. 2008;63:45-52.
  27. Caron-Mazet J, Roth B, Guillaume JC. Enquête de prévalence et des pratiques de prise en charge des plaies chroniques dans 14 établissements gériatriques du Haut-Rhin. Ann DermatolVenereol.2007;134:645-51.
  28. Couilliet D, Michel JM, Fuchs G, Haller MO, Guillaume JC. Prise en charge des plaies chroniques: Connaissances et pratiques des infirmières. Ann DermatolVenereol. 2001;128:1195-200.
  29. Schue RM, Langemo DK. Pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence and a modification of the Braden Scale for a rehabilitation unit. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 1998;25:36-43.