evaluation of anticoagulation therapy in non-valvular atrial Fibrillation in the emergency department

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Hanen Ghazali
Jihen Essid
Anware Yahmadi
Moez Mougaida
Mahbouba Chkir
Sami Souissi

Abstract

Introduction: The vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) are currently the most effective therapeutic class for the prevention of cerebrovascular eventsin atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. However, several studies showed an under-prescription of this therapy.The aim of the study was to assess the prescription of VKAs in non-valvular AF (NVAF) patients and factors influencing the non-prescription ofsuch treatment.

Methods: We conducted a prospective, observational study in an emergency department (ED). Patients with high thromboembolic risk NVAFand not receiving VKAs beforehand were included. Calculation of CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores was performed. An analytic study wasconducted in order to identify independent predictors of the under-prescription of VKAs.

Results: During study, 176 patients were enrolled, the mean age was 67±13 years and 66% were women. The mean CHA2DS2VASc andHASBLED scores were 2.88 ± 1.55 and 1.52 ± 1.05, respectively. Among our cohort, VKA was prescribed in 36% of cases. Age >70 years(OR=1.59, 95%CI[1.11-2.21],p<0.001), creatinine level ≥110 μmol/l (OR=2.54,95%CI[1.20–5.37],p=0.01) and aspirin use (OR =1.7,95%CI [1.08-2.67],p=0.02) were independently associated with under-prescription of VKAs. Bedside, the main causes reported by the emergency physicians(EP) were: factors related to patient characteristics (n=38,34%), factors related to emergency physician (n=62,55%), factors related to the patientenvironment (n=20,17%) and factors related to the drug (n=22,23%).

Conclusions: Our results showed that the prescription of VKAs was low in ED. The reasons of VKA under-prescription are linked usually toseveral factors inherent to patient and to the adherence of EP to new recommendations.

Keywords:

Non valvular atrial fibrillation, Emergency Departments, Anticoagulation

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. McDonald AJ, Pelletier AJ, Ellinor PT, et al. Increasing US emergency department visit rates and subsequent hospital admissions for atrial fibrillation from 1993 to 2004. Ann Emerg Med 2008;51:58-65.
  2. Santini M, De Ferrari GM, Pandozi C, et al. FIRE Investigators. Atrialfibrillation requiring urgent medical care. Approach and outcome in thevarious departments of admission. Data from the Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter Italian Registry (FIRE). Ital Heart J 2004;5:205-13.
  3. Camm AJ, Lip GY, De Caterina R, Savelieva I, Atar D, Hohnloser S et al.The ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation:2012focused update. ESC Clinical Practice Guidelines. European HeartJournal 2012;33:2719-47.
  4. Stewart S, Hart CL, Hole DJ, McMurray J. Population prevalence,incidence, and predictors of atrial fibrillation in the Renfrew/Paisleystudy. Heart 2001;86:516-21.
  5. Miyasaka Y, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ. Secular trends in incidence of atrialfibrillation in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1980 to 2000, and implicationson the projections for future prevalence. Circulation 2006;114:119-25.
  6. Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA, Chang Y, Henault LE, Selby JV.Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implicationsfor rhythm management and stroke prevention: the Anticoagulation andRisk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. JAMA 2001;285:2370-5.
  7. European Atrial Fibrillation Trial Study Group. European Atrial FibrillationTrial: secondary prevention in non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation aftertransient ischaemic attack or minor stroke. Lancet 1993;342:1255-62.
  8. The Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. Predictors ofthromboembolism in atrial fibrillation. II. Echocardiographic features ofpatients at risk. Ann Intern Med 1992; 116: 6-12.
  9. Petersen P, Boysen G, Godtfredsen J, Andersen ED, Andersen B.Placebo-controlled, randomised trial of warfarin and aspirin forprevention of thromboembolic complications in chronic atrial fibrillation:The Copenhagen AFASAK study. Lancet 1989; 333:175-9.
  10. The Boston Area Anticoagulation Trial for Atrial Fibrillation Investigators.The effects of low-dose warfarin on the risk of stroke in patients withnonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 1990; 323:1505-11.
  11. Ezekowitz MD, Bridgers SL, James KE, et al. for the Veterans AffairsStroke Prevention in Nonrheumatic Atrial Fibrillation Investigators.Warfarin in the prevention of stroke associated with nonrheumatic atrialfibrillation. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1406-12.
  12. Van Walraven C, Hart Rg, Singer De et al. Oral anticoagulants vs aspirin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: an individual patient meta-analysis. JAMA. 2002;288(19) :2441-8.
  13. Poli D, Antonucci E, Grifoni E et al. Bleeding risk during oralanticoagulation in atrial fibrillation patients older than 80 years. J Am CollCardiol. 2009;54(11):999-1002.Poli D, Antonucci E, Grifoni E et al. Bleeding risk during oralanticoagulation in atrial fibrillation patients older than 80 years. J Am CollCardiol. 2009;54(11):999-1002.
  14. De Breucker S, Herzog G, Pepersack T et al. Could geriatriccharacteristics explain the under-prescription of anticoagulation therapyfor older patients admitted with atrial fibrillation? A retrospectiveobservational study. Drugs Aging. 2010;27(10):807-13.
  15. Kutner M, Nixon G, Silverstone F et al. Physicians' attitudes toward oralanticoagulants and antiplatelet agents for stroke prevention in elderlypatients with atrial fibrillation. Arch Intern Med 1991;151:1950-3
  16. McCrory DC, Matchar DB, Samsa G, Sanders LL, Pritchett ELC et al. Physician attitudes about anticoagulation for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in the elderly. Arch Intern Med 1995;155:277-81.
  17. Waldo AL, Becker RC, Tapson VF, Colgan KJ et al. The NABOR Steering Committee. Hospitalized patients with atrial fibrillation and a high risk of stroke are not being provided with adequate anticoagulation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:1729-36.
  18. Laguna P, Martín A, Del Arco C, et al; on behalf of the GEFAUR-1 Investigators. Risk factors for stroke and thromboprophylaxis in atrial fibrillation: what happens in daily clinical practice? the GEFAUR-1 study. Ann Emerg Med 2004;44:3-11.
  19. Stroke prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. The stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation study: Final results. Circulation 1991;84:527-39.
  20. Anderson DC, Asinger RW, Newburg SM, Farmer CC, Wang K, Bundlie SR. Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation investigators. Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation study final results. Circulation1991;84:527-9.
  21. Friberg L, Hammar N, Ringh M. Stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation: who gets it and who does not? Report from the Stockholm Cohort-study on Atrial Fibrillation (SCAF-study). Eur Heart J 2006;27(16):1954-64.
  22. Nieuwlaat R, Capucci A, Lip GY. Antithrombotic treatment in real-lifeatrial fibrillation patients: a report from the Euro Heart Survey on AtrialFibrillation. Eur Heart J 2006;27(24):3018-26.
  23. Schwammenthal Y. Anticoagulation remains underused in prevention ofstroke associated with atrial fibrillation: Insights from two consecutivenational surveys. Intern J Cardiol 2010; 0167-5273.
  24. Gladstone DJ. Potentially preventable strokes in high risk patients withatrial fibrillation who are adequately anticoagulated. Stroke 2009;40:234-40.
  25. Waldo AL, Becker RC, Tapson VF, et al. for the NABOR SteeringCommittee. Hospitalized patients with atrial fibrillation and a high risk ofstroke are not being provided with adequate anticoagulation. J Am CollCardiol 2005;46:1729-36.
  26. Ogilvie IM, Newton N, Welner SA, et al. Underuse of oral anticoagulantsin atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. Am J Med 2010;123:638-45.
  27. Mant J, Hobbs FD, Fletcher K, et al. Warfarin versus aspirin for stroke prevention in an elderly community population with atrial fibrillation (the Birmingham Atrial Fibrillation Treatment of the Aged Study, BAFTA): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2007;370:493-503.
  28. Laguna P, Martín A, Del Arco C, et al; Spanish Atrial Fibrillation in Emergency Medicine Study Group (GEFAUR-2). Differences among clinical classification schemes for predicting stroke in atrial fibrillation: implications for therapy in daily practice. Acad Emerg Med 2005;12:828-34.
  29. Sjalander S, Sjalander A, Svensson PJ, et al. Atrial fibrillation patients do not benefit from acetylsalicylic acid. Europace 2014;16:631-38.
  30. Lau YC, Lip GY. Acetylsalicylic acid for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a conspiracy that needs to end? Europace 2014;16:619-20.
  31. Bradley BC, Perdue KS, Tisdel KA, Gilligan DM. Frequency of anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation and reasons for its non-use at a veterans affairs medical center. Am J Cardiol 2000;85:568-72.
  32. Beyth RJ, Antani MR, Covinsky KE, et al. Why isn't warfarin prescribed to patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation? J Gen Intern Med 1996;11:721-8.
  33. Coll-Vinent B, Fuenzalida C, García A, et al. Management of acute atrial fibrillation in the emergency department: a systematic review of recent studies. Eur J Emerg Med 2013;20:151-9.
  34. Ogilvie IM, Welner SA, Cowell W, et al. Ischaemic stroke and bleeding rates in “real-world” atrial fibrillation patients. Thromb Haemost. 2011;106:34-44.
  35. Scowcroft AC, Lee S, Mant J. Thromboprophylaxis of elderly patients with AF in the UK: an analysis using the General Practice Research Database (GPRD) 2000-2009. Heart 2013;99:127-32.
  36. Singer DE, Chang Y, Fang MC, et al. The net clinical benefit of warfarin anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med 2009;151: 297-305.
  37. Roy B, Desai RV, Mujib M, et al. Effect of warfarin on outcomes in septuagenarian patients with atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 2012;109:370-7.
  38. Friberg L, Rosenqvist M, Lip GHY. Net clinical benefit of warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a report from the Swedish atrial fibrillation cohort study. Circulation 2012; 125:2298-2307.
  39. Coll-Vinent B, Pacheco G, Junyent M, et al. Impact of implementing common guidelines at different care levels in a healthcare area on the improvement of atrial fibrillation treatment. Rev Esp Cardiol 2007;60:392-403.