Laparoscopic double sacrocolpopexy : a failure for the posterior compartment?

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Aug 2, 2016
Download
pdf
Vol. 94 No. 2 (2016): Issue Feb 2016

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Moez Kdous
Jad Diari
Monia Ferchiou
Fethi Zhioua

Abstract


ABSTRACT
Aim: To evaluate the anatomical and functional outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy using an anterior and a posterior prolen mesh, for the cure of genital prolapse. STUDY Methods : This is a consecutive five year prospective observational study in which 80 patients presented with at least a Stage 2 apical prolapsed (Baden and Walker), with an anterior or a posterior vaginal wall prolapse, who underwent a double sacrocolpopexy. Two prolen prosthesis (Pro-swing® – Textile Hi-Tec™, Fr) were used for this technique. Pre- and post-operative data referring to prolapse quantitation (Baden and Walker classification), scores of quality of life and sexuality (French equivalent of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI), Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ) and Pelvic organ prolapse-urinary Incontinence-Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12) were compared. Peri and postoperative complications constituted the secondary outcome measures.
Results: At 2 years after surgery, all patients were accessible for evaluation. For these patients, the anatomical success rates (Stage 0 or 1) on the apical, anterior or posterior compartments were respectively 100%, 97.5% and 89.3%. On the functional level, all the scores of quality of life and sexuality were significantly improved except anorectal scores CRADI and CRAIQ.
Conclusions: This study confirms that PFC is an effective technique for the treatment of the urogenital prolapsed. On the anatomical levelresults are less good for the posterior compartment. On the functional level, our results do not plead in favour of an improvement of anorectal disorders.

Keywords:

Laparoscopy; Mesh; Prolapse; Sacrocolpopexy

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Golfier F, Sesques A, Benayoun D, Krauth JS, LunelPotencier L, Benchieb M, et el. Laparocopicpromontofixation: definig early morbidityusing a standardized method. GynecolObstetFert 2014, 42:378-382.
  2. Bui C, Ballester M, Chereau E, Guillo E, Daraï E. Functional results and quality of life of laparoscopic promontofixation in the cure of genital prolapse. GynecolObstetFertil 2010, 38:563-8.
  3. Sergent F, Resch B, LoiselC,Bisson V, Schaal JP, Marpeau L. Mid-term outcome of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with anterior and posterior polyester mesh for treatment of genito-urinary prolapse. Eur J GynecolObstet Repro Biol 2011, 156:217-222.
  4. Baden WF, Walker TA, Lindsday HJ. The vaginal profile. Tex Med J 1968, 64:56-8.
  5. Dorsey JH, Peagues RF. Laparoscopic reconstructive procedures. ObstetGynecol Forum 1993, 4: 2-6.
  6. Antiphon P, Elard S, Ben Youssef A. Laparoscopic promontory sacral colpopexy: is the posterior recto-vaginal mesh mandatory? EurUrol 2004, 45: 655-661
  7. Rozet F, Mandron E, Arroyo C, Andrews H, Cathelineau X, Mombeta A, et al. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy approach for genitor-urinary prolapse: experience with 363 cases. EurUrol 2005, 47:230-236
  8. Rivoire C, Botchorishvili R, Canis M, Jardon K, Rabischong B, Wattiez A, et al. Complete laparoscopic treatment of genital prolapse with meshes including vaginal promontofixation and anterior repair: a series of 138 patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007, 14: 712-718
  9. Agarwala N, Hasiak N, Shade M. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy with Gynemesh as graft material - experience and results. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007, 14: 577-583
  10. Misrai V, Chartier-Kastler E, Almeiras C. Surgical management of chronic refractory pain after TVT treatment for stress urinary incontinence. ProgUrol 2006, 16: 368-371
  11. North CE, Ali-Ross NS, Smith AR, Reid FM. A prospective study of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapsed. BJOG 2009, 116: 1251-1257
  12. Sarlos D, Brandner S, Kots L, Gygax N, Schaer G. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for uterine and post-hysterectomy prolapse: anatomical results, quality of life and perioperative outcome-a prospective study with 101 cases. IntUrogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008, 19: 1415-1422.
  13. Ross JW, Preston M. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for severe vault prolapse: five-year outcome. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2005, 12: 221-226
  14. Claerhout F, Roovers JP, Lewi P, Vergutes J, De Ridder D, Deprest J. Implementation of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy - a single center's experience. IntUrogynecol 2009, 20 : 1119-1125
  15. Gadonneix P, Ercoli A, Salet-Lizée D. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with two separate meshes along the anterior and posterior vaginal walls for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapsed. J Am AssocGynecolLaparosc 2004, 11: 29-35
  16. Cheret A, Von Theobald P, Lucas J, Dreyfus M, Herlicoviez M. Laparoscopic promontofixation feasibility study in 44 patients. J GynecolObstetBiolReprod 2011, 30: 139-143
  17. Ganatra AM, Rozet F, Sanchez-Salas R, Barret E, Galiano M, Cathelineau X, et al. The current status of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a review. EurUrol 2009,55:1089—103
  18. Paraiso MF, Walters MD, Rackley RR, Melek S, Hugney C. Laparoscopic and open sacral colpopexies: a cohort study. AmJObstetGynecol 2005, 192:1752—8.
  19. Cutner AS. The use of submucosal small intestinal mesh in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and posterior vaginal repair.GynecolSurg 2005,2:187—9, 2005.
  20. Higgs PJ, Chua HL, Smith AR. Long-term review of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Br J ObstetGynecol 2005,112:1134—8.
  21. Granese R, Candiani M, Perino A, Romano F, Cucinella G. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse: 8 years experience. Eur J ObstetGynecolReprodBiol 2009, 146: 227-231
  22. Altman D, López A, Gustafsson C, Falconer C, Nordenstam J, Zetterström J. Anatomical outcome and quality of life following posterior vaginal wall prolapse repair using collagen xenograft. Int Urogynecol J PelvicFloorDysfunct 2005, 16 (4) (2005): 298-303