Short, midterm and late results of percutaneous coronary interventions for left main coronary artery disease
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
SUMMARY
Background: Left main coronary artery disease is found in 4-6% of patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography. Coronary artery bypass graft is the gold standard. However, percutaneous coronary intervention is a continuously evolving substitution for
surgery in such patients.
Methods: We report a retrospective study of 32 patients with relevant left main coronary artery disease treated by angioplasty in our faculty, between January 2005 and March 2011.
Results: The mean age of the population on the study was 59.7±10.9 years. The sex-ratio was 3.57. The rate of angiographic success was 97%. The in-hospital stay was uneventful in 94%¨of our patients. Only one patient died of cardiogenic shock complicating an acute anterior myocardial infarction. After a mean follow up of 18.5 ± 15.4 months, the in-stent restenosis rate was 16.12%. The rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was 29%. Independent predictive factors of MACE were: cardiogenic shock on admission (p=0.022), emergency procedures (p=0.033), Euroscore > 6 (p=0.001), Parsonnet score > 20 (p=0.036), High C réactive protein levels on admission (p=0.007),le taux de créatinine (p=0.008), un diamètre de référence du TCCG < 3.5 mm (p =0.036) et l’utilisation de stents
(p=0.036) and the use of bare metal stents (p=0.036). Independent predictive factors of in-stent restenosis were: use of bare metal stents (p=0.004) and Paclitaxel drug eluting stents (p=0.037).
Conclusion: Percutaneous coronary intervention is safe and a validated alternative to coronary artery bypass graft for left main coronary artery disease. However, it should be reserved to selected patients and limited to experienced centers.
Background: Left main coronary artery disease is found in 4-6% of patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography. Coronary artery bypass graft is the gold standard. However, percutaneous coronary intervention is a continuously evolving substitution for
surgery in such patients.
Methods: We report a retrospective study of 32 patients with relevant left main coronary artery disease treated by angioplasty in our faculty, between January 2005 and March 2011.
Results: The mean age of the population on the study was 59.7±10.9 years. The sex-ratio was 3.57. The rate of angiographic success was 97%. The in-hospital stay was uneventful in 94%¨of our patients. Only one patient died of cardiogenic shock complicating an acute anterior myocardial infarction. After a mean follow up of 18.5 ± 15.4 months, the in-stent restenosis rate was 16.12%. The rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was 29%. Independent predictive factors of MACE were: cardiogenic shock on admission (p=0.022), emergency procedures (p=0.033), Euroscore > 6 (p=0.001), Parsonnet score > 20 (p=0.036), High C réactive protein levels on admission (p=0.007),le taux de créatinine (p=0.008), un diamètre de référence du TCCG < 3.5 mm (p =0.036) et l’utilisation de stents
(p=0.036) and the use of bare metal stents (p=0.036). Independent predictive factors of in-stent restenosis were: use of bare metal stents (p=0.004) and Paclitaxel drug eluting stents (p=0.037).
Conclusion: Percutaneous coronary intervention is safe and a validated alternative to coronary artery bypass graft for left main coronary artery disease. However, it should be reserved to selected patients and limited to experienced centers.
Keywords:
Left main coronary artery disease, treatment, percutaneous coronary intervention##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
References
- Ragosta M1, Dee S, Sarembock IJ, Lipson LC et al. Prevalence of unfavorable angiographic characteristics for percutaneous intervention in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006;68:357-62.
- Giannoglou GD1, Antoniadis AP, Chatzizisis YS, Damvopoulou E et al. Prevalence of narrowing >or=50% of the left main coronary artery among 17,300 patients having coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol. 2006; 98:1202-5.
- Taggart DP, Kaul S, Boden WE, Ferguson TB Jr et al. Revascularization for unprotected left main stem coronary artery stenosis stenting or surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:885-92.
- El-Menyar AA1, Al Suwaidi J, Holmes DR Jr. Left main coronary artery stenosis:state-of-the-art. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2007;32:103-93.
- Conti CR, Selby JH, Christie LG, Pepine CJ et al. Left main coronary artery stenosis: clinical spectrum, pathophysiology, and management. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1979;22:73-106.
- Sheehan FH, Braunwald E, Canner P, Dodge HT et al. The effect of intravenous thrombolytic therapy on left ventricular function: a report on tissue-typeplasminogen activator and streptokinase from the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI Phase I) trial. Circulation. 1987;75:817-29.
- Parsonnet V1, Dean D, Bernstein AD. A method of uniform stratification of risk for evaluating the results of surgery in acquired adult heart disease. Circulation. 1989;79:I3-12.
- Nashef SA1, Roques F, Michel P, Gauducheau E et al. European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999;16:9-13.
- Farooq V1, van Klaveren D, Steyerberg EW, Meliga E et al. Anatomical and clinical characteristics to guide decision making between coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for individual patients: development and validation of SYNTAX score II. Lancet. 2013 ;381 :639-50
- Brennan JM1, Dai D, Patel MR, Rao SV et al. Characteristics and longtermoutcomes of percutaneous revascularization of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis in the United States: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry, 2004 to 2008. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59 :648-54.
- Biondi-Zoccai GG1, Lotrionte M, Moretti C, Meliga E et al. A collaborative systematic review and meta-analysis on 1278 patients undergoing percutaneousdrug-eluting stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease. Am Heart J. 2008;155(2):274-83.
- Capodanno D1, Stone GW, Morice MC, Bass TA et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery in left main coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical data. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58 :1426-32.
- Fischell TA1, Carter AJ. Unprotected left main stenting: an alternative to CABG in a DES world? J Invasive Cardiol. 2005 ;17 :129-30.
- McFadden EP1, Stabile E, Regar E, Cheneau E et al. Late thrombosis in drug- eluting coronary stents after discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy. Lancet. 2004;364 :1519-21
- Daemen J1, Wenaweser P, Tsuchida K, Abrecht L et al. Early and late coronary stent thrombosis of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in routine clinical practice: data from a large two-institutional cohort study. Lancet. 2007;369:667-78.
- Roukoz H1, Bavry AA, Sarkees ML, Mood GR et al. Comprehensive meta- analysis on drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents during extended follow-up. Am J Med. 2009;122 :581.e1-10.
- Pandya SB1, Kim YH, Meyers SN, Davidson CJ et al. Drug-eluting versus bare- metal stents in unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis a meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 ;3 :602-11.
- Tamburino C1, Di Salvo ME, Capodanno D, Palmerini T et al. Comparison of drug eluting stents and bare-metal stents for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease in acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol. 2009;103:187-93.
- Tamburino C1, Angiolillo DJ, Capranzano P, Di Salvo M et al. Long-term clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stent implantation in unprotected left main coronary artery disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 ;73:291- 8
- Chieffo A1, Morici N, Maisano F, Bonizzoni E et al. Percutaneous treatment withdrug-eluting stent implantation versus bypass surgery for unprotected left main stenosis: a single-center experience. Circulation. 2006;113:2542-7.
- Lee JY1, Park DW, Kim YH, Yun SC et al. Incidence, predictors, treatment, and Long term prognosis of patients with restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:1349-58.
- Meliga E1, Garcia-Garcia HM, Valgimigli M, Chieffo A et al. Diabetic patients treated for unprotected left main coronary artery disease with drug eluting stents: a3-year clinical outcome study. The diabetes and drug eluting stent for LeFT main registry (D DELFT). EuroIntervention. 2008 ;4:77-83.
- Suárez de Lezo J1, Medina A, Romero M, Hernández E et al. Predictors of restenosis following unprotected left main coronary stenting. Am J Cardiol. 2001;88:308-10.
- Pavei A1, Oreglia JA, Martin G, Tousek P et al. Long-term follow-up of percutaneous coronary intervention of unprotected left main lesions with drug eluting stents: predictors of clinical outcome. EuroIntervention. 2009 ;4:457-63.
- Palmerini T1, Sangiorgi D, Marzocchi A, Tamburino C et al. Ostial and midshaft lesions vs. bifurcation lesions in 1111 patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis treated with drug-eluting stents: results of the survey from the Italian society of Invasive Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:2087-94
- Moses JW1, Leon MB, Popma JJ, Fitzgerald PJ et al. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1315-23.
- Stone GW1, Ellis SG, Cox DA, Hermiller J et al. A polymer-based, paclitaxel- eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:221-31.
- Chieffo A, Meliga E, Latib A, Park SJ et al. Drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease. The DELTA registry: a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:718-27.
- Lee RJ1, Shih KN, Lee SH, Shyu KG et al. Predictors of long-term outcomes in patients after elective stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery disease. Heart Vessels. 2007;22:99-103. Epub 2007 Mar 23.
- Agarwal S1, Zaman T, Tuzcu EM, Shishehbor M et al. Comparison of outcomes of unprotected left main versus multivessel coronary artery interventions. Am J Cardiol. 2011;108:15-20.