laparoscopic liver resection: initial experience in a north-african single center

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Amine Benkabbou
Amine Souadka
Badr Serji
Hajar Hachim
Hadj Omar El Malki
Raouf Mohsine
Lahssan Ifrine
Abdelkader Belkouchi

Abstract

SUMMARY
Background: Over past decades laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has gained wide acceptance among hepatobiliary surgeons community. To date, few data are available concerning LLR programs in developing countries. This study aimed to assess feasibility and safety of LLR in a Moroccan surgical unit.
Methods: From June 2010 to February 2013, patients that received LLR were identified from a prospective “liver resection” database and included in this study. Parenchymal transection was performed using Harmonic scalpel and bipolar clamp with no Intraoperative ultrasound use or systematic pedicle clamping. LLR difficulty was categorized into 3categories according to Louisville-statement (I-III). Demographic informations, liver lesion informations, operative details, pathological tumor-margin and 1-months postoperative morbidity according to Clavien-Dindo(C-D) classification were analyzed.
Results: Among 104 patients who underwent liver resection 13(12,5%) had LLR. There were 7 females and 6 males with mean age of 57,5±17 years. LLR was performed for benign lesions in 3 cases and malignant ones in 10 (77%) patients: hepatocarcinoma in 7 patients and synchronous rectal-liver metastasis in 3 patients. Lesions were solitary in 12 (92%) patients with median size of 50mm (15mm-150mm). Patients with liver metastasis received combined laparoscopic rectal and liver resection. We used pure laparoscopic approach in 12 (92%) patients and hybrid one in 1 patient. LLR difficulty was category I, II and II in respectively 3(23%), 6(46%) and 4(31%)patients. Conversion rate to open liver resection was 15%. Mean blood loss was 395min±270min with no hepatic pedicle
clamping or peroperative blood transfusion. All resections were tumorfree margin. Mortality rate was nil and morbidity occurred in 4(30%) patients: ascites (C-D 2) and pelvic sepsis in combined resections (CD 3b). Median hospital stay was 6 days.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic liver resection in our context is safe in selected patients, since no operative mortality, blood transfusion requirement or palliative resection was recorded and liver related morbidity rate was low. Intraoperative ultrasound liver examination capacities are mandatory to improve laparoscopic liver resection program’s quality and extend indications.

Keywords:

Liver resection, laparoscopic approach, hepatectomy.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, et al. The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008 Annals of surgery 2009: 250; 825-830
  2. Dagher I, Di Giuro G, Dubrez J, et al. Laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy: a comparative study American journal of surgery 2009: 198; 173-177
  3. Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients Annals of surgery 2009: 250; 831-841
  4. Cai XJ, Yang J, Yu H, et al. Clinical study of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for malignant liver tumors Surgical endoscopy 2008: 22; 2350-2356
  5. Cherqui D, Laurent A, Tayar C, et al. Laparoscopic liver resection for peripheral hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease: midterm results and perspectives Annals of surgery 2006: 243; 499-506
  6. Kim H, Suh KS, Lee KW, et al. Long-Term Outcome of Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Case- Controlled Study with Propensity Score Matching Surgical Endoscopy 2014 Mar;28(3):950-60
  7. Zhou Y, Xiao Y, Wu L, et al. Laparoscopic liver resection as a safe and efficacious alternative to open resection for colorectal liver metastasis: a meta-analysis BMC surgery 2013: 13; 44
  8. Soubrane O, Goumard C, Laurent A, et al. Laparoscopic resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a French survey in 351 patients HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association 2014 Apr;16(4):357-65.
  9. Malinchoc M, Kamath PS, Gordon FD, et al. A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts Hepatology 2000: 31; 864-871
  10. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey Annals of surgery 2004: 240; 205-213
  11. Tranchart H, Dagher I Laparoscopic liver resection: A review Journal of visceral surgery 2014: 151(2):107-15
  12. Mostaedi R, Milosevic Z, Han HS, et al. Laparoscopic liver resection: Current role and limitations World journal of gastrointestinal oncology 2012: 4; 187-192
  13. Koffron AJ, Auffenberg G, Kung R, et al. Evaluation of 300 minimally invasive liver resections at a single institution: less is more Annals of surgery 2007: 246; 385-392; discussion 392-384
  14. Abbott DE, Cantor SB, Hu CY, et al. Optimizing clinical and economic outcomes of surgical therapy for patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2012: 215; 262-270
  15. Martin RC, 2nd, Augenstein V, Reuter NP, et al. Simultaneous versus staged resection for synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2009: 208; 842-850
  16. McKenzie SP, Vargas HD, Evers BM, et al. Selection criteria for combined resection of synchronous colorectal cancer hepatic metastases: a cautionary note International journal of colorectal disease 2014 Jan 11. PMID: 24414017 [Epub ahead of print]
  17. Belli G, Fantini C, D'Agostino A, et al. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with histologically proven cirrhosis: short- and middle-term results Surgical endoscopy 2007: 21; 2004-2011