Violence against women in the marriage : cross-sectional study in the family planning clinic monastir

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Imene Anes Jellali
Mohamed Ali Jellali
Ridha Gataa
Anwar Mechri

Abstract

SUMMARY
Background : Violence against women in the marriage is now recognized as a violation of human rights and as a major problem of public health.
Aim : The objectives of this study were to estimate the prevalence, specify the typology and to determine associated factors with violence against women in the marriage.
Methods : It was a cross-sectional study carried on 197 married women recruited in family planning center of Monastir, by means of a questionnaire containing some sociodemographic characteristics of the consultant and her spouse and the Woman Abuse Screening Tool to estimate the violence in the marriage
Results : The lifetime prevalence of violence against women in the marriage was 56.9%. The most common form of violence was psychological (56.9%), followed by economic violence (41.1%), physical violence (32%) and sexual violence (10.6%). The combination of at least two forms of violence was reported by 84% of
victims. The precarious professional status of consultant and her spouse, spouse's alcoholism, the number of children upper for three were the main factors associated with violence in marriage.
Conclusion : These results justify the implement of screening and support programs for women victims of violence in marriage.

Keywords:

Violence, women, spouse, marriage.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Derobert L. Traité de médecine légale. Paris : Flammarion, 1974.
  2. Krantz G, Moreno C. Violence's against woman. J Epidemiol Comm Health 2005; 9:818-21.
  3. Plichta SB. Intimate partner violence and physical health consequences: policy and practice implications. J Interpers Violence. 2004; 19:1296- 323.
  4. Adeodato VG, Carvalho Rdos R, de Siqueira VR, de Matos e Souza FG. Quality of life and depression in women abused by their partners. Rev Saude Publica. 2005; 39:108-13.
  5. Belhaj A, Melki W, Khiari G, Ben Abda S, Hachmi Z. Les épouses battues. Enquêtes dans un centre de santé de base en Tunisie. Journal Tunisien de Psychiatrie 1998; 1: 3-6.
  6. Ghachem Attia R, Bouasker A, Ben Zineb S, Douki S. La violence conjugale en Tunisie : résultats d'une enquête. Nervure 2007 ; 20 (Suppl n°2) : 41-50.
  7. Brown JB, Lent B, Schmidt G, Sas G. The application of the woman abuse screening tool (WAST) in family practice. J Fam Pract 2000; 49: 896-903.
  8. Noelanders S, Opdebeeck S. Prévenir, subir et recourir à la violence. Centre Universitaire du Limbourg, Ministère de l'Emploi et du Travail et de la politique d'égalité des chances ; 1998.
  9. Office National de la Famille et de la Population. Enquête nationale sur la violence à l'égard des femmes en Tunisie. Tunis : Imprimerie officielle, 2010
  10. Henrion R. Les femmes victimes de violences conjugales, le rôle des professionnels de santé : Rapport au ministère chargé de la santé. Paris : la documentation Française, 2001.
  11. Souffron K. Les violences conjugales. Toulouse: Milan, 2000
  12. Johnson H. Violence and abuse in personal relationships conflict, terror and in intimate relationships. In A.L. Vangelisti Pearlman (Eds.),Cambridge handbook of personnal relationships, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
  13. Donnés sur la prévalence de la violence contre les femmes : Etude par pays : compilation par ONU femmes, 2011. www.unifem.org/.../violence.../vaw-prevalence-matrix-2011-fr.pdf .
  14. Vasseur P. Profil Clinique de femme victimes de violences conjugales, Presse Med 2004 ; 33:1566-8.
  15. Boucher S, Lemlin J, MC Nicoll L. Viol conjugal et trauma relationnel. Sexologie 2009; 18:141-6.
  16. Morvant C. Le médecin face aux violences conjugales : Analyse à partir d'une étude auprès des médecins généralistes, [thèse]. Paris : Université Pierre et Marie Curie ; 2000.
  17. Yoshihama M. Domestic violence in Japan: Research, program development and emerging movements. In A. Roberts (Ed.), Battered women and their families: Intervention strategies and treatment programs. New York: Springer, 1998: 405-47.
  18. Theriault L, Gill C. Les déterminants sociaux de la santé et la violence conjugale : quels sont les liens ? Service social 2007; 53:75-89.
  19. Jaspard M. Les Violences envers les femmes en France, une enquête nationale. Paris: La Documentation française, 2003.
  20. Romito P, Pomicino L, Lucchetta CH, Scrimin F, Turan JM. The relationships between physical violence, verbal abuse and women's psychological distress during the postpartum period, J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2009;30:115-21.
  21. Begum SH, Dwivedi SN, Pandey A, Mittal S. Association between domestic violence unintended pregnancies in India. Natl Med J India 2010;23:198-200.
  22. Mundle M, Haddar A, Baur B, Haldar S, Chattopadhyay S, Soren AB. Perception of couples about contraception in eastern India. Southeast Asian Trop Med Public Health 2011;42:395-401.
  23. Koenig M, Stephenson R, Acharya R, Barrick L, Ahmed S, Hindin M. Domestic violence and early childhood mortality in rural India: evidence from prospective data. Int J Epidemiology 2010;39:825-33.
  24. Jurisat. Résultats d'une enquête nationale sur l'agression contre la conjointe. Toronto: Statistique Canada 1994; 14:1-22.
  25. Kingston RJ. The association between socio-economic characteristics and the frequency of wife assaults. McMaster University, 1998.
  26. Johnson H. Dangerous domains, violence against women in Canada: Toronto: Nelson, 1996.
  27. Gracia E, Herrero J, Fuente A, Lila M. Neighborhood Social Disorder and Attitudes Toward Partner Violence Against Women: Evidence from Latin-American Immigrants in Spain. The Open Sociology Journal 2008; 1:1-8.
  28. Hedin LW, Grimstad H, Möller A, Schei B, Janson PO. Prevalence of physical and sexual abuse before and during pregnancy among Swedish couples. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999; 78:310-5.
  29. Richardson J, Coid J, Petruckevitch A, Chung WS, Moorey S, Feder G. Identifying domestic violence: cross sectional study in primary care. BMJ 2002; 324: 274.
  30. Hotaling GT, Sugarman DB. An analysis of risk markers in husband to wife violence: the current state of knowledge. Violence Vict 1986; 1:101- 24.
  31. Testa M, Livingston JA, Collins RL. The role of women's alcohol consumption in evaluation of vulnerability to sexual aggression. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2000;8:185-91.
  32. Hunt GP, Laidler KJ. Alcohol and violence in the lives of gang members. Alcohol Res Health. 2001; 25:66-71.
  33. Trygvesson K. The ambiguous excuse: attributing violence to intoxication-Young's Swedes about the excuse value of alcohol. Contemporary drug problems 2004; 31:231-61.