Appropriateness of indication for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in a Tunisian endoscopy unit
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
SUMMARY
Background : Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) is an increasing and reliable procedure. Given the high costs and potential risks, appropriate indication of UGE may be facilitated by referring to qualifying criteria such as those devised by the European Panel (EPAGE). This prospective study evaluates the applicability and efficacy of these criteria in clinical practice.
Methods: Cross sectional study. Consecutive patients were referred to our unit endoscopy for diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy between January 2011 and June 2011. Demographic data, indication of the procedure, and endoscopic diagnosis were collected. The appropriateness of UGE was assessed based on EPAGE II criteria before the procedure.
Results: EPAGE criteria were applicable in 89.1% of cases. They were 78 men (48.1%) and mean age was 49 years [14 - 91]. Indications for UGE were extremely appropriate, appropriate, inappropriate and uncertain in 21.6%, 47.4%%, 8.8% and 22.2% respectively. Among patients with clinically significant lesions detected
by UGE, 70.7% had an appropriate indication. Clinically significant lesions were disclosed in 59% of the appropriate group and 54% of the inappropriate group. All cancers were observed in patients with appropriate indications. Patients with appropriate indication were older than patients belonging to the inappropriate group (53.6 years versus 39.9 years, p =0,0001).
Conclusion: In this present study, EPAGE criteria were applicable in 89.1% and indication was judged appropriate in more than two-third of cases. However, clinical significant lesions were observed in a proportion of patients with inappropriate indication, and in some relevant clinical situations EPAGE criteria were not applicable. Therefore, even if these criteria are helpful for decision-making, final decision must however rely upon practitioner. Qualifying criteria for an appropriate selection of endoscopical procedure adapted to our population are advisable.
Background : Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) is an increasing and reliable procedure. Given the high costs and potential risks, appropriate indication of UGE may be facilitated by referring to qualifying criteria such as those devised by the European Panel (EPAGE). This prospective study evaluates the applicability and efficacy of these criteria in clinical practice.
Methods: Cross sectional study. Consecutive patients were referred to our unit endoscopy for diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy between January 2011 and June 2011. Demographic data, indication of the procedure, and endoscopic diagnosis were collected. The appropriateness of UGE was assessed based on EPAGE II criteria before the procedure.
Results: EPAGE criteria were applicable in 89.1% of cases. They were 78 men (48.1%) and mean age was 49 years [14 - 91]. Indications for UGE were extremely appropriate, appropriate, inappropriate and uncertain in 21.6%, 47.4%%, 8.8% and 22.2% respectively. Among patients with clinically significant lesions detected
by UGE, 70.7% had an appropriate indication. Clinically significant lesions were disclosed in 59% of the appropriate group and 54% of the inappropriate group. All cancers were observed in patients with appropriate indications. Patients with appropriate indication were older than patients belonging to the inappropriate group (53.6 years versus 39.9 years, p =0,0001).
Conclusion: In this present study, EPAGE criteria were applicable in 89.1% and indication was judged appropriate in more than two-third of cases. However, clinical significant lesions were observed in a proportion of patients with inappropriate indication, and in some relevant clinical situations EPAGE criteria were not applicable. Therefore, even if these criteria are helpful for decision-making, final decision must however rely upon practitioner. Qualifying criteria for an appropriate selection of endoscopical procedure adapted to our population are advisable.
Keywords:
Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, appropriateness, indication##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
References
- J.-P. Vader, F. Froehlich, R. W. Dubois, C. Beglinger, V. Wietlisbach, V. Pittet, N. Ebel, J.-J. Gonvers, B. Burnand. European Panel on the Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE): Conclusion and WWW Site. Endoscopy 1999; 31 (8): 687-94
- Froehlich F, Bochud M, Gonvers JJ, Dubois RW, Vader JP, Wietlisbach V, Burnand B. Appropriateness of gastroscopy: Dyspepsia. Endoscopy 1999; 31: 579- 95
- Bochud M, Gonvers JJ, Vader JP, Dubois RW, Burnand B, Froehlich F. Appropriateness of gastroscopy: Gastroesophageal reflux disease. Endoscopy 1999; 31: 596- 603
- Bochud M, Gonvers JJ, Vader JP, Dubois RW, Burnand B, Froehlich F. Appropriateness of gastroscopy: Barrett's esophagus. Endoscopy 1999; 31: 604- 10
- Vader JP, Larequi-Lauber T, Froehlich F, Burnand B, Dubois RW, Gonvers JJ. Appropriateness of gastroscopy: Atypical chest pain. Endoscopy 1999; 31: 611-4
- De Bosset V, Gonvers JJ, Froehlich F, Dubois RW, Burnand B, Vader JP. Appropriateness of gastroscopy: Bleeding and dysphagia. Endoscopy 1999; 31: 615-22
- Gonvers JJ, De Bosset V, Vader JP, Dubois RW, Burnand B, Froehlich F. Appropriateness of gastroscopy: risks factors of gastric cancer. Endoscooy1999;31:623-6.
- Froehlich F, Burnand B, Pache I, Vader JP, Fried M, Schneider C, Kosecoff J, Kolodny M, Dubois RW, Brook RH, et al. Overuse of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in a country with openaccess endoscopy: a prospective study in primary care. Gastrointest Endosc 1997;45:13-9.
- Kahn KL, Kosecoff J, Chassin MR, Solomon DH, Brook RH. The use and misuse of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Ann Intern Med 1988; 109: 664-70.
- Minoli G, Prada A, Gambetta G, Formenti A, Schalling R, Lai L, Pera A. The ASGE guidelines for the appropriate use of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in an open access system. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 42: 387 - 9.
- Froehlich F, Burnand B, Pache I, Vader JP, Fried M, Kosecoff J, Kolodny M, Dubois RW, Brook RH, Gonvers JJ. Overuse of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in a country with open-access endoscopy. Gastroenterology 1996; 110: A17.
- Chassin MR, Kosecoff J, Park RE, Winslow CM, Kahn KL, Merrick NJ, Keesey J, Fink A, Solomon DH, Brook RH. Does inappropriate use explain geographic variations in the use of Health Care Services? A study of three procedures. JAMA 1987; 258: 2533 - 7.
- Axon ATR, Bell GD, Jones RH, Quine MA, McCloy RF. Guidelines on appropriate indications for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. BMJ 1995; 310: 853 - 6.
- Quine MA, McCloy RF, Devlin BH, Hopkins A. Appropriate use of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy- a prospective audit. Gut 1994; 35: 1209 - 14.
- Seematter-Bagnoud L, Vader JP, Wietlisbach V, Froehlich F, Gonvers JJ, Burnand B. Overuse and underuse of diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in various clinical settings. Int J Qual Health Care 1999: Aug;11(4):301-8.
- Kaliszan B, Soulé JC, Vallot T, Mignon M. Applicability and efficacy of qualifying criteria for an appropriate use of diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2006;30(5):673-80.
- Fernández-Esparrach G, Gimeno-GarcÃa AZ, Llach J, Pellisé M, Ginès A, Balaguer F, Mata A, Castells A, Bordas JM . Guidelines for the rational use of endoscopy to improve the detection of relevant lesions in an open-access endoscopy unit: a prospective study. Med Clin (Barc). 2007;129(6):205-8.
- Appropriate use of gastrointestinal endoscopy. American society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.Gastrointest Endos 2000;53:831-7.
- Axon AT, Bell GD, Jones RH, Quine MA, McCloy RF. Guidelines on appropriate indications for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Working Party of the Joint Committee of the Royal College of Physicians of London, Royal College of Surgeons of England, Royal College of Anaesthetists, Association of Surgeons, the British Society of Gastroenterology, and the Thoracic Society of Great Britain. BMJ 1995;310:853-6.