What could be the contribution of general practitioners in the management of cancer patients from the central region of tunisia: a retrospective study about 215 physicians.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
SUMMARY
Background: General practitioners have a major contribution in cancer prevention and screening. However, their contribution in the treatment plan management and in the post treatment follow-up of cancer patients needs to be clarified.
Objective: To evaluate the contribution of general practitioners of the public and private sectors in the management of cancer patients during and after the treatment protocol. To analyze the problems they encounter and find the possible solutions.
Method: A retrospective declarative KAP (Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices) survey was conducted from first September 2010 to 28 February 2011 in the central region of Tunisia among 215 primary care physicians in the public and private sectors. The questionnaire focused on their effective involvement, the role during treatment, follow up and supportive care.
Results: Nearly 80% of physicians who participated in the survey were involved in the management of their patients, primarily by ensuring adherence to their treatment (42.9%), in the follow up care after treatment (42.3%) and in palliative care (29%), however the majority has never prescribed opioid drugs (66.5%). Only 46.6% of the physicians announced the diagnosis of cancer to their patients. The questioned doctors deplored the lack of training in oncology (22.8%) and the feeling of being excluded from the management of their patients once they have addressed them to their specialist peers (48.8%). The interviewed physicians expressed their wish to have a further medical training in oncology (79.5%) and to join a structured cancer network (55.8%).
Conclusion: The majority of interviewed general practitioners of our region were engaged in cancer patients' care. However, gaps were identified especially in palliative care and in prescribing opioid drugs. Promoting continuing education in this field and the establishment of cancer networks will allow extend the scope of general practitioners' intervention in the cancer network.
Background: General practitioners have a major contribution in cancer prevention and screening. However, their contribution in the treatment plan management and in the post treatment follow-up of cancer patients needs to be clarified.
Objective: To evaluate the contribution of general practitioners of the public and private sectors in the management of cancer patients during and after the treatment protocol. To analyze the problems they encounter and find the possible solutions.
Method: A retrospective declarative KAP (Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices) survey was conducted from first September 2010 to 28 February 2011 in the central region of Tunisia among 215 primary care physicians in the public and private sectors. The questionnaire focused on their effective involvement, the role during treatment, follow up and supportive care.
Results: Nearly 80% of physicians who participated in the survey were involved in the management of their patients, primarily by ensuring adherence to their treatment (42.9%), in the follow up care after treatment (42.3%) and in palliative care (29%), however the majority has never prescribed opioid drugs (66.5%). Only 46.6% of the physicians announced the diagnosis of cancer to their patients. The questioned doctors deplored the lack of training in oncology (22.8%) and the feeling of being excluded from the management of their patients once they have addressed them to their specialist peers (48.8%). The interviewed physicians expressed their wish to have a further medical training in oncology (79.5%) and to join a structured cancer network (55.8%).
Conclusion: The majority of interviewed general practitioners of our region were engaged in cancer patients' care. However, gaps were identified especially in palliative care and in prescribing opioid drugs. Promoting continuing education in this field and the establishment of cancer networks will allow extend the scope of general practitioners' intervention in the cancer network.
Keywords:
Survey; Clinical management ; General practitioner ; Malignant tumor##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
References
- Van den Block L, Onwuteaka-Philipsen B, Meeussen K, et al. Nationwide continuous monitoring of end-of-life care via representative networks of general practitioners in Europe. BMC Fam Pract. 2013; 14:73.
- Brownson RC, Davis JR, Simms SG, et al. Cancer control knowledge and priorities among primary care physicians. J Cancer Educ 1993; 8: 35-41
- McIlfatrick S, Keeney S, McKenna H, McCarley N, McElwee G. Investigating the role of the general practitioner in cancer prevention: a mixed methods study. BMC Fam Pract. 2013; 14:58.
- Gangler A, Delva R, Gamelin E. [The role of general practitioner in French cancer centers]. Bull Cancer. 2013; 100:323-32.
- Dagada C, Mathoulin-Pélissier S, Monnereau A, Hoerni B. Prise en charge des patients cancéreux par les médecins généralistes. Résultats d'une enquête auprès de 422 médecins en Aquitaine. Presse Med 2003; 32: 1060-5
- McAvoy BR. General practitioners and cancer control. Med J Aust 2007; 187: 115-7.
- Brocq H, Collomp R, Bioy A. Le dispositif médical d'annonce: enjeux, méthodes, proposition pour l'avenir. Douleurs 2005 ; 6: 197-224
- Rougé Bugat ME, Pierre Mesthé P, Filleron T, et al. Prévention, dépistage et annonce du cancer : le rôle du médecin généraliste. “ Enquête d'opinion dans la région Midi-Pyrénées”. Rev Prat 2010; 14: 21.
- Krakowski I, Chardot C, Bey P, et al. Organisation coordonnée de la prise en charge des symptômes et du soutien à toutes les phases de la maladie cancéreuse: vers la mise en place de structures pluridisciplinaires de soins oncologiques de support. Bull Cancer 2001; 88: 321-8
- Bungener M, Demagny L, Holtedahl KA, Letourmy A. La prise en charge du cancer : quel partage des rôles entre médecine générale et médecine spécialisée? Prat Organ Soins 2009; 40: 191-6
- Collectif de 53 medecins généralistes. Le médecin généraliste et les douleurs d'origine cancéreuse: RESONantes : témoignage d'un groupe de 53 médecins généralistes impliqués dans la prise en charge de la douleur. Douleurs 2007; 8: 313-9
- Emery C, George B, Gomas JM, et al. Prise en charge de la douleur en médecine générale : l'étude EPIDOL. Douleurs 2005; 6: 366-73
- Aubin M, Vézina L, Allard L, et al. Les soins palliatifs. Profil de pratique des médecins de la région de Québec. Can Fam Physician 2001; 47: 1999-2005
- Burge FI, Lawson B, Johnston G, Flowerdew G. Health care restructuring and family physician care for those who died of cancer. BMC Fam Pract 2005; 6: 1
- Tirelli U1, Spina M, Augello AF, et al. Is it better to transfer long-term cancer survivors to general practitioners or develop clinics for long-term survivors within the cancer centers? J Clin Oncol 2014; 32: 257.
- Virgo KS1, Lerro CC, Klabunde CN, et al. Barriers to breast and colorectal cancer survivorship care: perceptions of primary care physicians and medical oncologists in the United States. J Clin Oncol 2013; 3: 2322-36.
- Burton A. Do family doctors get enough oncology training? Lancet Oncol 2008; 9: 94-5
- Marti P. La problématique médecin généraliste et cancer Oncologie 2010; 12: 120-4
- Barton M, Bell P, Sabesan S, Koczwara B. What should doctors know about cancer? Undergraduate medical education from a societal perspective. Lancet Oncol 2006; 7: 596-601
- Anvik T, Holtedahl K, Mikalsen H. “When patients have cancer, they stop seeing me” - the role of the general practitioner in early follow-up of patients with cancer - a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract 2006; 7: 19
- Liard F, Chassany O, Keddad K, Jolivet-Landreau I. Enquête sur la prise en charge de la douleur et les besoins en formation en médecine générale Douleurs 2002; 3: 69-73