Diagnostic accuracy, limits and practical implications of Multidetector Computed Tomography Coronarography. About 105 cases

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Meriem Drissa
Mehdi Cheour
Chadia Chourabi
Rim Lakhdhar
Emna Bennour
Habiba Drissa

Abstract

Background: Non-invasive examination of coronary artery disease is an attractive and rapidly evolving possibility. In certain clinical situations ,multi-detector computed tomography coronarography (MDCT) is currently considered as a promising technique alternative to conventional coronary angiography (CCA).
Purpose : We suggest from our personal study and from a review of the literature, to analyze diagnostic accuracy of MDCT , its limits and to deduct, its practical implications and its indications. Methods : 105 patients underwent 64-slice MDCT . Coronary angiography was performed every time when the MDCT was pathologic. In two cases the MDCT was realized in complement of inconclusive coronary angiography .Study of coronary arteries was based on “per –segment” and “per- patients” analyse
Results : The mean age was 63,3 years., sex ratio was 0 ,7. Hypertension was noted in 63% of cases 29 ,9 % of patients had mellitus diabetes.The initial clinical presentation was unusual chest pain in 46 patients, exercise chest pain in 40 cases. the MDCT was done for the detection of silent ischemia In 5 cases, for screening of CAD in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy in 5 cases , before cardiac surgery in 3 case and before non cardiac surgery in 2 cases. MDCT was normal in 30 patients ( 28% ) so coronary angiography was avoided in 60% of patients with unusual chest pain, and in 50% of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and in also in 50% of patients selected for cardiac or non cardiac surgery. In per-segment study the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of the MDCT in detecting coronary stenosis were respectively 89 %,98% , 91% and 97% versus, 98%,89%,94%, 95% the per-patient evaluation .The MDCT was inclusive in10 patients because .of calcifications in 8 cases and because uncontrolled unchecked heart rate in 40 cases
Conclusion : our results for negative predictive value of MDCT are similar to reports from the literature. This suggests that in this clinical setting , MDCT may replace coronary in patients with low probability of coronary artery diseases, its is also useful for assessment of cardiomyopathy and before cardiac or non cardiac surgery.

Keywords:

MDCT, coronary angiography, coronary artery disease

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Barbara K, Kohlmann R, Fuchs A, et al. Illustration de l'anatomie coronaire en scanner volumique. J Radiol 2004;85:1975-83.
  2. Mollet RM, Cademartiri F, Krestin GP, et al. Improved diagnostic accuracy with 16- row multi-slice CT coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:128-32
  3. Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K, et al.Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin slice multi-detector row spiral CT and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation 2003;107:664-6
  4. Sun Z, Jiang W. Diagnostic value of multislice CT angiography in coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 2006; 60:279-86
  5. Hamon M, Morello R, Riddell JW. Diagnostic performance of 16 versus 64-slice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared against conventional invasive coronary angiography : a meta-analysis. J Radiology 2007; 245:720-31
  6. Plass A, Grünenfelder J, Leschka S, et al. Coronary artery imaging with 64-slice computed tomography from cardiac surgical perspective. Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg 2006;30:109 16
  7. Heuschmid M, Kuettner A, Schroeder S, et al. ECG-gated 16-MDCT of the coronary arteries: assessment of image quality and accuracy in detecting stenoses. Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:1413-9
  8. Garcia MJ, Lessick J, Hoffmann MH. Accuracy of 16-row multidetector CT for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis. JAMA 2006;296:403-11.
  9. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem C, et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 2005;112:2318-23.
  10. Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Runza G, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol 2005;16:575-82
  11. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Shaw LJ, et al. Mata-analysis of comparative diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and multislice computed tomography for noninvasive coronary angiography. Am Heart J 2006;151:404-11.
  12. Hamon M, Biondi-Zoccai G, MalaguttiP, et al. Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared against conventional invasive coronary angiography: a metaanalysis. Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1896-910
  13. M Hamon. Performances diagnostiques des scanners 64 coupes dans l'évaluation de la maladie coronaire. J Radiol 2009;90:779-85
  14. Hoffmann U, Moselewski F, Cury RC, et al. Predictive value of 16-slice multidetector spiral CT to detect significant obstructive coronary artery disease in patients at high risk for coronary artery disease: patient versus segment-based analysis. Circulation 2004;110:2638-43
  15. Ratajczak A, Hanssen M, Burguet JL. Couppie P, Reeb T, De Poli F. Scanner coronaire: bilan d'une experience préliminaire dans le cadre de la vraie vie. Ann Cardiol Angéiol 2007;56:188-93
  16. Hamon M, Lepage O, Malagutti P, et al. Diagnostic performance of 16- and 64- section spiral CT for coronary artery bypass graft assessment:meta-analysis. Radiology 2008; 247:679-96.
  17. Bluemke DA, Achenbach S, Budoff M, et al. Noninvasive coronary artery imaging Magnetic resonance angiography and multidetector computed tomography angiography: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on cardiovascular imaging and intervention and the Council on cardiovascular radiology and intervention, and the Councils on clinical cardiology and cardiovascular disease in the young. Circulation 2008;118:586-606
  18. Tanja S. Meyer, MD*, Stefan M .Improved Noninvasive Assessment of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts With 64-Slice Computed Tomographic Angiography in an Unselected Patient Population J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007; 49:946-50
  19. Uva MS, Matias F, Mesquita A, Costa R, Baú J, Pedro A, Magalhães MP. Sixteen-Slice Multidetector Computed Tomography for Graft Patency Evaluation After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. J Card Surg 2008;23:17-22
  20. Kitagawa T, Fujii T, Tomohiro Y, et al. Noninvasive assessment of coronary stents in patients by 16-slice computed tomography. Int J Cardiol 2006;109:188-94
  21. Van Mieghem CA, Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Malagutti P. Multislice spiral computed tomography for the evaluation of stent patency after left main coronary artery stenting: a comparison with conventional coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Circulation 2006;114: 645-55
  22. Armin Z, Julie M. Miller et al . Diagnostic Accuracy of Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography According to Pre-Test Probability of Coronary Artery Disease and Severity of Coronary Arterial CalcificationJ Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59: 379-87
  23. Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM, et al. ACCF/ ACR/ SCCT/ SCMR/ ASNC/ NASCI/SCAI/ SIR 2006 appropriatness criteria for cardiac computes tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1475-97
  24. Jakamy R1, Barthélémy O, Le Feuvre C, Berman E, Boutekadjirt R, Cluzel P, Metzger JP, Helft G. Accuracy of multislice computedtomography in the preoperative assessment of coronary disease in patients scheduled for heart valve surgery. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2012;105:24-431
  25. Achenbach S, Michael Ms, A Schuhbäck, Influence of heart rate and phase of the cardiac cycle on the occurrence of motion artifact in dualsource CT angiography of the coronary arteries. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr,2012 ; 6:91-98
  26. Leschka S, Scheffel H, Husmann L, et al. Effect of decrease in heart rate variability on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-MDCT coronary angiography. Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:1583-90.
  27. . Hamilton-Craig CR, Friedman D, Achenbach S.Cardiac computed tomography-evidence, limitations and clinical application. Heart lung circ 2012; 21(2):70-81
  28. Ong TK, Chin SP, Liew CK, et al. Accuracy of 64-row detector computed tomography in detecting coronary artery disease in 134 symptomatic patients: influence of calcification. Am Heart J 2006;151:1323-6
  29. Jakobs TF, Becker CR, Ohnesorge B, et al. Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation. Eur Radiol 2002;12:1081-6.