Sexuality and contraception: A prospective study about 85 cases

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Nabil Mathlouthi
Mouna Jarraya
Anissa Bengharbi
Mohamed Dhouib
Kaies Chaabene
Khaled Trabelsi
Habib Amouri
Belhassen Ben Ayed
Mohamed Guermazi

Abstract

Background: Contraception opposing procreation interferes with the primary purpose of sexuality. Few studies have yet been made on the actual interaction between contraception and sexuality.
aim: To study contraceptive practices ie non medicalized contraception and oral contraception, study aspects of women's sexuality and to study the physiological impact and psychological contraception on women's sexuality.
methods: Prospective and analytical study conducted over a period spanning from October 2008 to February 2009. This study was based on a survey, carried out through an oral questionnaire to 85 women in reproductive age, married, with contraceptive-based pill or natural birth control for at least one cycle, having experienced during their personal background a sexuality contraception or at least one contraceptive method other than its current average.
results: Comparison between the group of women using oral contraception and women not using contraception medicalized showed significant differences in outcomes relating to: the average frequency of intercourse / month (p = 0.01), sexual desire ( p = 0.01), sexual pleasure (p = 0.03). The comparison of the different parameters of sexuality among the group of women using intra uterine device and women using oral contraceptives showed no significant differences in the parameters of sexuality.
Conclusion: The awareness of the big importance of the interaction between sexuality and contraception, in one way or another, could help us tailor our applications to contraceptive practices of each woman.

Keywords:

Oral contraception- sexuality

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Rossier C., Leridon H. et al, Pilule et préservatif, substitution ou association? Une analyse des biographies contraceptives des jeunes femmes en France de 1978 à 2000. Population-F 2004 ; 59 : 449-78.
  2. Measson A., Mamelle N., Munoz F et al. Pratiques contraceptives et âge des femmes. Contraception Fertil Sexual. 1989;17 :13-18.
  3. Rosen R., Brown C., Heiman J. et al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Therapy. 2000 ; 26 :191-208.
  4. Martin-Loeches M., Orti R.M., Monfort M., Ortega E., Rius J., A comparative analysis of the modification of sexual desire of users of hormonal contraceptives and intrauterine devices. Eur J Contraception Reprod Health Care. 2003;8: 129-34.
  5. Tonkelaar I. (den), Oddens B. Factors influencing women's satisfaction with birth control methods. Eur J Contraception Reprod Health Care. 2001; 6: 153-58.
  6. Sitzia J., Wood N. Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. Soc Science Med. 1997;45:1829-43.
  7. More C., Sexualité et contraception vues à travers l'action du Mouvement français pour le Planning familial de 1961 à 1967. Mouv Social 2004 ; 207:75-95.
  8. Mimoun S., LE M.G., Buhler M. et al. Le vécu des règles et de leurs troubles chez 603 femmes sous contraception en 1999. Gynécol Obstet Fertil. 2000; 28 :904-12.
  9. Lachowsky M. Qu'est-ce que la contraception a changé pour la femme? Contraception Fertil Sexual 2007 ;24 :816-18.
  10. Bydlowski M., Dayan-lintzer M. Approche psychanalytique de la contraception d'aujourd'hui, J Gynécol Obstét Biol Reprod, 1999; 8 : 527-31.
  11. GIAMI A., SPENCER B. Les objets techniques de la sexualité et l'organisation des rapports de genre dans l'activité sexuelle : contraceptifs oraux, préservatifs et traitement des troubles sexuels. Epidemiologie Sante Publique. 2004; 52:377-87.
  12. Castelo-Branco C, Huezo M.L, Ballesca Lagarda J.L. Definition and diagnosis of sexuality in the XXI century. Maturitas 2008;60:50-58.
  13. Bajos N., Ferrand M. La contraception, levier réel ou symbolique de la domination masculine ? Sci Soc Santé. 2004;22: 117-42.
  14. Caruso S. Sexual behavior of women taking low-dose oral contraceptive containing 15g ethinylestradiol/60g gestodene. Contraception. 2004; 69:237-40.
  15. Coenen CM., Thomas CM., Borm GF., Hollanders JM., Rolland R. Changes in androgens during treatment with four low-dose contraceptives. Contraception 1996;53:171-6.
  16. Bancroft J., Sherwin B.B., Alexander G.M., Davidson D.W., Walker A. Oral contraceptives, androgens, and the sexuality of young women: II the role of androgens, Arch Sexual Behavior 1991;20:105-20.