From an urologist view: Are we safe with endoscopic surgery? Overview of ergonomic problems encountered by the urologist during video endoscopic surgery

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Dec 7, 2012
Download
pdf
Vol. 90 No. 12 (2012): Issue Dec 2012

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Satâa Sallami
Aida Benzarti
Abdelmajid Ben Jemaa

Abstract

Background : The importance of minimally invasive surgery in urology has constantly increased in the last 20 years. Endoscopic resection of prostate and bladder tumors is actually a gold standard with many advantages for patients.
Aim: To analyze the problems related to the ergonomic conditions faced by urologist during video endoscopic surgery by review of the recent literature.
Methods: All evidence-based experimental ergonomic studies conducted in the fields of urology endoscopic surgery and applied ergonomics for other professions working with a display were identified by PubMed searches. Data from ergonomic studies were evaluated in terms of efficiency as well as comfort and safety aspects. Constraint postures for urologists are described and ergonomic requirements for optimal positions are discussed.
Results: The ergonomics of urological endoscopic surgery place urologists at risk for potential injury. The amount of neck flexion or extension, the amount of shoulder girdle adduction or abduction used, and stability of the upper extremities during surgery; which are maintained in a prolonged static posture; are the main risk factors. All these constraints may lead to muscle and joint fatigue, pain, and eventual musculoskeletal injury. Moreover, these issues may impact surgical accuracy.
Conclusion : Urologist posture, operating period, training are important ergonomic factor during video surgery to prevent musculoskeletal disorders.

Keywords:

Minimally invasive surgery, Endoscopy, Video endoscopic surgery, Operating room, Ergonomics, Human engineering.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Vereczkei A, Feussner H, Negele T, et al. Ergonomic assessment of the static stress confronted by surgeons during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2004;18: 1118-22.
  2. van Veelen MA, Nederlof EA, Goossens RH, Schot CJ, Jakimowicz JJ. Ergonomic problems encountered by the medical team related to products used for minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc. 2003;17: 1077-81.
  3. Kaya OI, Moran M, Ozkardes AB, Taskin EY, Seker GE, Ozmen MM. Ergonomic problems encountered by the surgical team during video endoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008;18: 40-4.
  4. Nguyen NT, Ho HS, Smith WD, et al. An ergonomic evaluation of surgeons' axial skeletal and upper extremity movements during laparoscopic and open surgery. Am J Surg. 2001;182: 720-4.
  5. Berguer R, Smith WD, Davis S. An ergonomic study of the optimum operating height for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2002;16: 416-21.
  6. Matern U, Faist M, Kehl K, Giebmeyer C, Buess G. Monitor position in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2005;19: 436-40.
  7. Ehrenstein WH, Arnold-Schulz-Gahmen BE. Perception-action compatibility and eye-dominance in using visually-displayed information. In Advances in multimedia and simulation; Humanmachineinterface implications Edited by: Holzhausen KP. Bochum, Verlag der FH Bochum; 1997:478-486. 4
  8. Luttmann A, Jäger M, Sökeland J. Ergonomic assessment of the posture of surgeons performing endoscopic transurethral resections in urology. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2009 19;4: 26.
  9. Gandavadi A, Ramsay JR, Burke FJ. Assessment of dental student posture in two seating conditions using RULA methodology - a pilot study. Br Dent J. 2007;203:601-5.
  10. Burke FJT, Freeman R. The practice of dentistry: an assessment of reasons for premature retirement. Br Dent J. 1997;182: 250-4.
  11. Bernard BP. Neck musculoskeletal disorders: evidence for workrelatedness. In: Musculoskeletal Disorders and Workplace Factors: A Critical Review of Epidemiologic Evidence for Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders of the Neck, Upper Extremity, and Low Back. Publication No. 97-141. Cincinnati, OH: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; 1997.
  12. McAtamney L, Corlett EN. RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Appl Ergon. 1993; 24: 91-9.
  13. Bonney RA, Corlett EN. Head posture and loading of the cervical spine. Appl Ergon. 2002;33: 415-7.
  14. Dellman NJ, Haslegrave CM, Chaffin DB. Head and neck. In: Working Postures and Movements: Tools for Evaluation and Engineering. Danvers, MA: CRC Press; 2004.
  15. Luttmann A, Sökeland J, Laurig W. Muscular strain and fatigue among urologists during transurethral resections using direct and monitor endoscopy. Eur Urol. 1998;34:6-13.
  16. Luttmann A, Jäger M, Sökeland J, Laurig W. Electromyographical study on surgeons in urology. II. Determination of muscular fatigue. Ergonomics. 1996;39:298-313.
  17. Szeto GP, Ho P, Ting AC, Poon JT, Cheng SW, Tsang RC. Work-related musculoskeletal symptoms in surgeons. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19:175-84.
  18. Berguer R. Surgery and ergonomics. Arch Surg. 1999;134: 1011-6.
  19. Cohen AL, Gjessing CC, Fine LJ, Bernard BP, McGlothlin JD. Elements of Ergonomics Programs: A Primer Based on Workplace Evaluations of Musculoskeletal Disorders. Publication No. 97-117. Cincinnati, OH: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; 1997.
  20. Luttmann A, Sökeland J, Laurig W. Electromyographical study on surgeons in urology. I. Influence of the operating technique on muscular strain. Ergonomics. 1996 ;39:285-97.