Prognostic factors in gastric carcinoma after R0 resection with DII lymph node dissection. Tunisian experience.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Sofiene Ayadi
Amine Daghfous
Amine Makni
Fadhel Fteriche
Houcine Maghrebi
Wael Rebai
Heykal Bedioui
Faouzi Chebbi
Rachid Ksantini
Adel Ammous
Mohamed Jouini
Montassar Kacem
Zoubeir Ben Safta

Abstract

Background: Curative resection with adequate lymph node dissection is the treatment of choice for gastric cancer.
Aim: To determine the prognostic factors after R0 resection with DII lymph node dissection.
Methods: We retrospectively assessed 126 patients who underwent R0 resection with DII lymph node dissection for gastric cancer (excluding the upper third of the stomach) in a single institution between 1991 and 2006 with median follow-up of 38.5 months (6 – 219). Prognostic factors were assessed by Cox proportional hazard model.
Results: There were 45 women and 81 men. The median age was 60 years (21 – 87). Four patients died (3.2 %). Postoperative hospital morbidity was 16.7 %. The pathologic review of the slides revealed that 50% of the tumors were stage T3 (63 cases). The median number of lymph node removed was 11 (8-40), 50% were involved. Five and 10 years survival rates were respectively 56.9 % and 40.2 %. In multivariable analysis, depth of wall invasion, lymph node involvement and more than 15 retrieved lymph nodes were found to be independent prognosis factors.
Conclusion: After R0 resection with DII lymphadenectomy, depth of wall invasion, lymph node involvement and more than 15 retrieved lymph nodes were independent predictive factors for survival.

Keywords:

Cancer stomach surgery, curative resection, lymphadenectomy

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Maehara Y, Kakeji Y, Koga T, et al. Therapeutic value of lymph node dissection and the clinical outcome for patients with gastric cancer. Surgery 2002; 131: 85-91.
  2. Otsuji E, Yamaguchi T, Sawai K, Sakakura C, Okamoto K, Takahashi T. Regional lymph node metastasis as a predictor of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with Borrmann type IV gastric carcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94: 434-7.
  3. Reis E, Kama NA, Doganay M, Atli M, Dolapci M. Long-term survival is improved by an extended lymph node dissection in potentially curable gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 2002; 49: 1167-71.
  4. Inoue K, Nakane Y, Michiura T, et al. Histopathological grading does not affect survival after R0 surgery for gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2002; 28: 633-6.
  5. Otsuji E, Yamaguchi T, Sawai K, Ohara M, Takahashi T. End results of simultaneous splenectomy in patients undergoing total gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma. Surgery 1996; 120: 40-4.
  6. Brady MS, Rogatko A, Dent LL, Shiu MH. Effect of splenectomy on morbidity and survival following curative gastrectomy for carcinoma. Arch Surg 1991; 126: 359-64.
  7. Kunisaki C, Shimada H, Ono HA, et al. Comparison of results of surgery in the upper third and more distal stomach. J Gastrointest Surg 2006; 10: 718-26.
  8. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma. 2nd English edition. Gastric Cancer 1998; 1: 10-24.
  9. Maruyama K, Sasako M, Kinoshita T, Sano T, Katai H, Okajima K. Pancreas-preserving total gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer.World J Surg 1995; 19:532-6.
  10. Macdonald JS, Smalley SR, Benedetti J, et al. Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 725-30.
  11. Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 11-20.
  12. Siewert JR, Bottcher K, Stein HJ, Roder JD. Relevant prognostic factors in gastric cancer: ten-year results of the German Gastric Cancer Study. Ann Surg 1998; 228: 449-61.
  13. Karpeh MS, Leon L, Klimstra D, Brennan MF. Lymph node staging in gastric cancer: is location more important than Number? An analysis of 1,038 patients. Ann Surg 2000; 232: 362-71.
  14. Doglietto GB, Pacelli F, Caprino P, Sgadari A, Crucitti F. Surgery: independent prognostic factor in curable and for advanced gastric cancer. World J Surg 2000; 24: 459-63.
  15. Nitti D, Marchet A, Olivieri M, et al. Ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes is an independent prognostic factor after D2 resection for gastric cancer: analysis of a large European mono institutional experience. Ann Surg Oncol 2003; 10: 1077-85.
  16. Degiuli M, Sasako M, Ponti A, Calvo F. Survival results of a multicentre phase II study to evaluate D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 2004; 90: 1727-32.
  17. Wu CW, Hsiung CA, Lo SS, Hsieh MC, Shia LT, Whang-Peng J. Randomized clinical trial of morbidity after D1 and D3 surgery for gastric cancer. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 283-7.
  18. Lee KY, Noh SH, Hyung WJ, et al. Impact of splenectomy for lymph node dissection on long-term surgical outcome in gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2001; 8: 402-6.
  19. Maruyama K, Sasako M, Kinoshita T, Okajima K. Effectiveness of systematic lymph node dissection in gastric cancer surgery. Gastric cancer. Berlin: Springer, 1993.
  20. Haruyama K. Quantitative statistical studies on lymph node metastasis of gastric carcinoma, with reference to its relationship with primary lesion and prognosis. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 1981; 82: 612-21.
  21. Adachi Y, Shiraishi N, Suematsu T, Shiromizu A, Yamaguchi K, Kitano S. Most important lymph node information in gastric cancer: multivariate prognostic study. Ann Surg Oncol 2000; 7: 503-7.
  22. Saito H, Tsujitani S, Maeda Y, et al. Combined resection of invaded organs in patients with T4 gastric carcinoma. Gastric Cancer 2001; 4: 206-11.
  23. Maruyama K. The most important prognostic factors for gastric cancer patients. A study using univariate and multivariate analyses. Scand J Gastroenterol 1987; 22: 63-68.
  24. Jatzko GR, Lisborg PH, Denk H, Klimpfinger M, Stettner HM. A 10-year experience with Japanese-type radical lymph node dissection for gastric cancer outside of Japan. Cancer. 1995 ; 76:1302-1.