Administrative databases provide observational studies with high quality

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published May 31, 2012
Download
pdf
Vol. 90 No. 6 (2012): Issue Jun 2012

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Chadli Dziri

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Urbach DR. Using administrative data to assess outcome: challenges and limitations. Clinical Congress 2003; 29: 26-28.
  2. Clifford Y. What can we learn from studies using administrative databases? Clinical Congress 2003; 24: 29-30.
  3. Güller U. Surgical outcomes research based on administrative data: inferior or complementary to prospective randomized clinical trials? World J Surg 2006; 30: 255-66.
  4. Wartak J, Fenna D, Gelfand ET, Callaghan JC. Computerized database for coronary bypass. J. Cardiovasc Surg 1984 ; 25 : 337-43.
  5. Romano PS, Roos LL, Luft HS, Jollis JG, Doliszny K. A comparaison of administrative versus clinical data: Coronary artery bypass surgery as an example. Ischemic heart disease patient outcomes research team. J Clin Epidemiol 1994; 47:249-60.
  6. Pasquali SK, Jacobs JP, Shook GJ, et al. Linking clinical registery data with administrative data using indirect identifiers: implementation and validation in the congenital heart surgery population. Am Heart J 2010; 160: 1099-104.
  7. Maraschini A, Seccareccia F, D'Errigo P, et al. Role of gender and age on early mortality after coronary artery bypass graft in different hospitals: Data from a national administrative database. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2010; 11: 537-42.
  8. Yeung ST, Davis AM, Soric R. Factors influencing inpatient rehabilitation lenght of stay following revision hip replacements: A retrospective study. BMC Musculoskeletal disorders 2010 ; 11 :252.
  9. Kuwabara K, Matsuda S, Fushimi K, Ishikawa KB, Horiguchi H, Fujimori K. Community-based appraisal of laparoscopic abdominal surgery in Japan. J Surg Res 2011; 165: e1-13.
  10. Kuwabara K, Matsuda S, Fushimi K, et al. Quantitative assessment of the advantages of laparoscopic gastrectomy and the impact of volume-related hospital characteristics on resource use and outcomes of gastrectomy patients in Japan. Ann Surg 2011; 253: 64-70.
  11. Manish M, Tiwari MD, Matthew R, et al. Differences in outcomes of laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2011; 7: 277-82.
  12. Chabra S, Gleason CA, Seidel K, Williams MA. Rising prevalence of gastroschisis in Washington State. J Toxicol Environ Health A 2011; 74: 336-45.
  13. Hammond J, Kozma C, Hart JC, et al. Rates of venous thromboembolism among patients with major surgery for cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 15: 1602-10.
  14. Merli GJ, Malangone E, Lin J, Lamerato L, Stern L. Real-world practices to prevent venous thromboembolism with pharmacological prophylaxis in US orthpedic surgery patients: an analysis of an integrated healthcare database. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2011; 32: 89-95.
  15. Amin AN, Lenhart G, Princis N, Lin J, Thompson S, Johnston S. Retrospective administrative database study of the time period of venous thromboembolism risk during and following hospitalization for major orthopaedic or abdominal surgery in real-world US patients. Hosp Pract 2011 ; 39 :7-17.
  16. Shanu K, Kurd MHS, Ole J, et al. Evaluation of the use of prognostic information for the care of individuals with venous leg ulcers or diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers. Wound repair regen 2009; 17 : 318-25.
  17. Gerbier S, Bouzbid S, Pradat E, et al. Use of the french medico'administrative database to detect nosocomial infections in the university hospital of Lyon. Rev Epidimiol Santé publique 2011; 59: 3-14.
  18. Samaali I, Ben Osman S, Bedoui R, et al. Evaluation de la qualité des soins dans un service de chirurgie générale : Utilité d'une base de données administrative. Tunis. Med 2012 ; 90 : 353 - 9