Lichtenstein versus Lichtenstein plus plug in prosthetic inguinal hernia repair: Preliminary results of a prospective randomized controlled trial
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
Background: Mesh- based hernioplasties became the citationsRaw in inguinal hernia repair.
Aim: To evaluate the results of combining a conic Plug to the Lichtenstein Mesh for inguinal hernia repair.
Methods: Between January 2007 and January 2009 we included 50 patients with primary or recurrent inguinal hernia in a prospective comparative randomized controlled trial. The randomization concerned the association of the conic Plug to the Lichtenstein Mesh. The primary objectives were to establish if any differences in operation time, postoperative pain response and/or postoperative recovery time, chronic pain and recurrence could be detected between the 2 groups. All patients were seen and data were collected after 2 weeks, 6 months and 2 years.
Results: Twenty two patients were treated by Lichtenstein Mesh (group A) and we associated the conic Plug to 28 patients (group B). The mean age was 56 years. Forty three patients were discharged after 24 hours. The postoperative pain was low with visual analogue scores ²5 for 48 patients. One patient had residual pain treated efficiency with medical treatment. No recurrence in the 2 groups in 2 years outcome. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups.
Conclusion: Results of the Lichtenstein plus Plug technique are similar to the Lichtenstein results. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups concerning early or late complications. The recurrence will be revaluated after 5 and 10 years outcome.
Aim: To evaluate the results of combining a conic Plug to the Lichtenstein Mesh for inguinal hernia repair.
Methods: Between January 2007 and January 2009 we included 50 patients with primary or recurrent inguinal hernia in a prospective comparative randomized controlled trial. The randomization concerned the association of the conic Plug to the Lichtenstein Mesh. The primary objectives were to establish if any differences in operation time, postoperative pain response and/or postoperative recovery time, chronic pain and recurrence could be detected between the 2 groups. All patients were seen and data were collected after 2 weeks, 6 months and 2 years.
Results: Twenty two patients were treated by Lichtenstein Mesh (group A) and we associated the conic Plug to 28 patients (group B). The mean age was 56 years. Forty three patients were discharged after 24 hours. The postoperative pain was low with visual analogue scores ²5 for 48 patients. One patient had residual pain treated efficiency with medical treatment. No recurrence in the 2 groups in 2 years outcome. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups.
Conclusion: Results of the Lichtenstein plus Plug technique are similar to the Lichtenstein results. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups concerning early or late complications. The recurrence will be revaluated after 5 and 10 years outcome.
Keywords:
Inguinal Hernia, Prosthetic repair, Lichtenstein, Plug, prospective trial##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
References
- Marre P, Pitre J, Timores A. e-mémoires de l'Académie Nationale de Chirurgie, 2009 ; 8 : 46-47.
- Verhaeghe P, Rohr S. Chirurgie des hernies inguinales de l'adulte. Monographies de l'association française de chirurgie, rapport présenté au 103ème congrès français de chirurgie, Paris : Octobre 2001.
- Jaquet E, Giordan J, Puche P. Evaluation de la prise en charge des hernies inguinales en chirurgie ambulatoire. Ann Chir 2004; 129: 138-43.
- Bay-nielsen M, Nilsson E, Nordin P. Chronic pain after open mesh and sutured repair of indirect inguinal hernia in young males. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 1372-76.
- Marre P, Damas JM, Penchet A. Traitement de la hernie inguinale de l'adulte : résultats des réparations sans tension. Ann. Chir 2001; 126 : 644-48.
- Abu-Own A, Onwudike M, Haque K.A. Primary inguinal hernia repair utilizing the mesh plug technique. Ambulatory Surgery 2000; 8: 31-35.
- Esbern Friis, Finn Lindahl. The tension-free hernioplasty in a randomized trial. Am.j.surgery 1996; 176: 315-319.
- Surlin V, Bordea A, Barrat C. Place des prothèses dans les cures de hernies inguinales. Use of prosthesis in inguinal hernia repair. Revista Societaii Romane De Chirurgie, 2003 : 1-5.
- Pélissier E, Marre P, Damas JM. Traitement des hernies inguinales: choix d'un procédé. Encycl Med Chir, Techniques chirurgicales - Appareil digestif, 40-138, 2000, 4p.
- Gonzalez JC, Suà rez Flores D, Munoz HC. Hernioplastia inguinal tipo lichtenstein. Cirujano-général 2000; 22 : 329.
- Wellwood J, Sculpher M, Stoker D. Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for inguinal hernia: outcome and cost. BMJ 1998; 317: 103-110.
- Pélissier E, Blum D, Marre P. Faisabilité et résultats à court terme de la technique de Plug dans la hernie inguinale; évaluation prospective. Ann. Chir 1997; 51 : 627-30.
- Fingerhut, Pélissier E. Traitement chirurgical des hernies inguinales. Choix d'un procédé. Encycl Med Chir, Techniques chirurgicales - Appareil digestif, 40-138, 2008.
- Ananian P, Barrau K, Balandraud P. Cure chirurgicale des hernies de l'aine de l'adulte. Mise au point. J Chir 2006 ; 143 : 76-83.
- D'Ambrogio A, Tempia-Caliera AA, Vuilleumier H, Givel JC. Chirurgie herniaire. Rev Med Suisse 2005; 1 : 112-4.
- Lichtenstein L, Shulman A.G, Amid P.K. The tension free hernioplasty. Am J Surg 1989; 157: 188-93.
- Bouillot J-L, Servajean S, Berger N. Comment choisir une prothèse pour le traitement des éventrations abdominales? Ann. Chir 2004; 129: 132-7.
- Gang Zhao, Peng Gao, Bin Ma, Jinhui Tian, Kehu Yang. Open Mesh techniques for inguinal Hernia repair: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Ann Surg 2009; 250: 35-42.
- Kingsnorth AN, Porter CS, Bennett DH. Lichtenstein patch or Perfix Plug-and-patch in inguinal hernia: a prospective doubleblind randomized controlled trial of short term outcome. Surgery 2000; 127: 276-83.
- Testini M, Miniello S, Piccini G, et al. Trabucco versus Rutkow versus Lichtenstein techniques in the treatment of groin hernia. A controlled randomized clinical trial. Minerva Chir. 2002; 57:371-76.
- Bringman S, Ramel S, Heikkinen TJ, et al. Tension-free inguinal fernia repair: TEP versus mesh-plug versus Lichtenstein: aprospective randomized cotrolled trial. Ann Surg 2003;237: 142- 47.
- Nienhuijs SW, Van Oort I, Keemers-Gels ME, et al. Randomized trial comparing the Prolene Hernia System, mesh plug repair and Lichtenstein method for open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2005;92:33-38.
- Mayagoitia JC, Prieto-Diaz Chavez E, Suarez D, et al. Predictive factors comparison of complications and recurrences in three tension- free herniorraphy techniques. Hernia 2006; 10:147-51.
- Frey DM, Wildisen A, Hamel CT, et al. Randomized clinical trial of Lichtenstein's operation versus mesh plug for inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2007; 94:36-41.
- Dalenbäck J, Andersson C, Anesten B, et al. Prolene Hernia System, Lichtenstein mesh and plug-and-patch for primary inguinal hernia repair: 3-year outcome of a prospective randomised controlled trial. The BOOP study: bi-layer and connector, on-lay, and on-lay with plug for inguinal hernia repair. Hernia. 2009; 13: 121-9.