Occupational low back trauma in Tunisia

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Nizar Ladhari
Adel Amri
Imene Youssef
Abada Mhamdi
Taoufik Bouhouch
Ezzeddine Gharbi
Mongi Hamdouni
Rafik Gharbi

Abstract

Background: In Tunisia, eight researches works, dealing with low back trauma (LBT), have been achieved in some occupational sector activities and only 2 of them have been published.
Aim: To synthesize data provided by these 8 works realized between 1998 and 2007, in order to estimate the disorder magnitude and to describe LBT victims profile in Tunisia.
Methods: The global population of study is made of 1357 LBT victims (977 belonging to the private sector and 380 to the public sector). The data collection was carried out according to an uniformed model for the 8 studies.
Results: In the public sector, Commission Médicale Centrale data show that LBT account for 4 to 5% of occupational accidents (OA) and that their annual incidence is from 32 to 36/100000. In the private sector, Caisse Nationale d’Assurance Maladie data reveal that LBT account for 7.7% to 9.5% of OA. LBT victim is a male (83%), with an age ranging between 36 and 43.5 years, married (84%), educated up to the secondary educational (91%) with a vertebral disorders history (34%). He belongs to the general-purpose workmen category in 1/2 of cases with an average seniority ranging between 7.8 and 16.2 years. LBT almost subjects, get at least of a sick leave. Work days lost is around 210 days for the private sector and 18 days for the public. The per annum amount versed for each LBT case, within the framework of the Total Temporary incapacity, is of 1449.319 DT and 45% of the subjects profit from a professional reclassification.
Conclusion: Our results join those of international studies having dealt with LBD in professional environment. In spite of some limiting methodological issues, they allowed us to provide to professionals in occupational health useful data for this occupational risk management.

Keywords:

Low back pain, Occupational accident, Sector activity, Incidence, Tunisia.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Versloot Jm, Rozeman A, Van Akkerveeken PF. The cost effectiveness of a back school program in industry. A longitudinal controlled field study. Spine 1992; 17:22-7.
  2. Anderson GBJ. The epidemiology of spinal desorders. In: Frymoyer JW, ed. The adult spine: principals practice, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincort-Raven, 1997: 93-141.
  3. Tsai Sp, Gilstrap El, Cowles Sr, Waddell Lc Jr, Ross CE. Personal and job characteristics of musculoskeletal injuries in an industrial population. J Occup Med 1992; 34:606-12.
  4. Dabbabi F, Bouajina E, Rammeh N, Saad I, Mrizak N. Facteurs de risques de lombalgie chez le personnel hospitalier. Arch Mal Prof 2006; 67:14-8.
  5. Mzabi Nacef H, Zouiter I, Kammoun H et al. Devenir socioprofessionnel de 90 cas de lombalgies, séquelles d'accidents de travail. Arch Mal Prof 2006; 67:357-8.
  6. Institut National de Recherche et de Sécurité (INRS). Les lombalgies. http://www.inrs.fr/inrs-pub/inrs01.nsf/, consulté le 28/05/2010.
  7. Caillard Jf, Czernichow P, Doucet J. Le risque lombalgique professionnel à l'hôpital. Arch Mal Prof 1987; 48:623-9.
  8. De Gaudemaris R, Blatier J.F, Quinton D et al. Analyse du risque lombalgique en milieu professionnel. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 1986; 34:308-17.
  9. Troussier B, Lamalle Y, Charruel C et al. Socioeconomic incidences and prognostic factors of low back pain caused by occupational injuries among the hospital personnel of Grenoble University Hospital Center. Rev Rhum Ed Fr 1993; 60:850-1.
  10. Berquez-Doise D, Leroyer A, Frimat P, Werhly S. Prévalence et facteurs de risques des lombalgies chez les préposés à la distribution de la poste. Arch Mal Prof 2002; 63:364-73.
  11. Abenhaim L, Suissa S. Importance and economic burden of occupational back pain a study of 2500 cases representative of Quebec. J Occup Med 1987; 29:670-4.
  12. Spengler Dm, Bigos Sj, Martin Na, Zeh J, Fisher L. Back injuries in industry: a retrospective study. Overview and cost analysis. Spine 1986; 11:241-5.
  13. Charruel C, Romazini S. Les lombalgies à EDF-GDF : étude des circonstances et conséquences socio-économiques des accidents de travail. Arch Mal Prof 1992; 53:140-1.
  14. Agence Nationale d'Accréditation et d'Evaluation en Santé (ANAES, 2000). Diagnostic, prise en charge et suivi des malades atteints de lombalgie chronique. http://www.has?sante.fr/portail/upload/docs/application/pdf/lomb aldec2000.pdf, consulté le 28/05/2010.
  15. Agence Nationale d'Accréditation et d'Evaluation en Santé (ANAES, 2000). Prise en charge diagnostique et thérapeutique des lombalgies et lombosciatiques communes de moins de trois mois d'évolution. http://www.has?sante.fr/portail/upload/docs/application/pdf/lomb reco.pdf , consulté le 28/05/2010.
  16. Haumesser D, Becker P, Grosso-Lebon B, Weill G. Aspects médicaux, sociaux et économiques de la prise en charge des lombalgies chroniques. Rev Med Ass Maladie 2004; 35:27-35.