Epidemiological profile, etiological diagnosis and prognosis of uterine synechias: Report of 86 cases

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Daaloul Walid
Ouerdiane Nadia
Masmoudi Abdelwaheb
Ben Hamouda Sonia
Bouguerra Badreddine
Sfar Rachida

Abstract

Background: Uterine synechias may pose real problems for fertility prognosis. It depends mainly on its etiology.
Aim: To study the epidemiological profile of patients, describe the circumstances of discovery of uterine synechias, specify the diagnostic procedures for pelvic ultrasound, hysterography and hysteroscopy and estimate the benefits on fertility.
Methods: A retrospective study over a period of 10 years from 1 January 2000 to December 31, 2009 in the department of obstetrics gynecology B Charles Nicolle’s Hospital in Tunis.
Results: We collected 86 patients. The age average was 35.42 years, gestit average of 1.36 with 37.2% of nulligeste and an average parity of 0.67. The uterine revision was the main etiology (55.8%). The main circumstance of discovery was the exploration of infertility (60%). Hysterosalpingography showed a luminal filling defect in 79% of patients mostly fundic location (37.3%). Faced with data from the hysteroscopy sensitivity of HSG was 78% and positive predictive value was 100%. For the seat of the synechia its sensitivity is only 40%. The surgical procedure took place in one time in 74 cases. Our complication rate is 8.14%: 2 uterine perforations, 2 falseroads and 3 cases of hemorrhage stopping surgery.
Conclusion: The main etiology is a history of uterus revision. The main circumstance of discovery is the exploration of infertility. Anatomic results were generally good as testified hysteroscopy control.

Keywords:

Synechia - uterus - operative hyseroscopy - fertility

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Blanc B, Boubli L. Endoscopie utérine. Paris éditions Pradel.1996.
  2. Hamou J, Salat Baroux J, Siegler AM. Diagnostic and treatment of intra-uterine adhesions by microhysteroscopy. Fertil Steril 1983; 39: 321-26.
  3. Lancet M, Kessler I. Traitement du syndrome d'Asherman par l'hystéroscopie et l'hystérographie concomitante. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 1986; 15: 464-6.
  4. Valle RF, Sciarra JJ. Intra-uterine adhesions: hysteroscopy diagnosis classification treatment and reproductive outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 158:1459.
  5. Roger P, D'ercole C, Cravello L, Boubli L, Blanc B. Hysteroscopic treatment of uterine synechias. A report of 102 cases. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 1996; 25: 33-40.
  6. Kdous M, Hachicha R, Zhioua F, Ferchiou M, Chaker A, Meriah S. Fertilité après cure hystéroscopique de synéchie. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2003; 31: 422-8.
  7. Eng CW, Tang PH, Ong CL. Hysterosalpingography: current applications. Singapore Med J 2007; 48: 368-74.
  8. Jansen FW, Vredevoogd CB, van Ulzen K et al. Complications of hysteroscopy: a prospective, multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 96:266-70.
  9. Hulka JF, Peterson HA, Phillips JM, Surrey MW. Operative hysteroscopy: American association of gynaecologic laparoscopists'1993 membership survey. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1995; 2:131-2.
  10. Aydeniz B, Gruber IV, Schauf B, Kurek R, Meyer A, Wallwiener D. A multicenter survey of complications associated with 21 676 operative hysteroscopies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2002; 104:160-4.
  11. Ducarme G, Davitian C, Zarrouk S, Uzan M, Poncelet C. Intérêt du gel d'acide hyaluronique dans la prévention des synéchies intra-utérines après hystéroscopie opératoire. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 2006; 35: 691-6.
  12. Guida M, Acunzo G, Sardo DS, Bifulco G, Piccoli R, Cerrota G. Effectiveness of auto-cross-linked hyaluronic acid gel in the prevention of intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Hum Reprod 2004; 19:1461-4.
  13. S. Ait Menguellet, P. Collinet, M. Cosson, C. Mariette, J.-P. Triboulet, D. Vinatier. Intérêt des produits antiadhérentiels en chirurgie gynécologique. Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité 2007 ; 35 ; 290-296.
  14. De Iaco PAM, Bovicelli G. L. Hyaluranon derivative gel (Hyalobarrier gel) in intrauterine adhesion prevention after operative hysteroscopy Ellipse 2003;19:3-6.
  15. Chen FP, Soong YK, Hui YL. Successful treatment of severe uterine synechiae with transcervical resectoscopy combined with laminaria tent. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 943-7.
  16. McComb PF, Wagner BL. Simplified therapy for Asherman's syndrome. Fertil Steril 1997; 68:1047-50.
  17. March CM, Israel R. Gestational outcome following hysteroscopic lysis of adhesions. Fertil Steril 1981; 36:455-9.
  18. Bukulumez 0, Yarali H, Gurgan T. Total corporeal synechia due to tuberculosis carry a very poor prognosis following hysteroscopic synechia lysis. Hum Reprod 1999; 14:1960-1.
  19. Gurgan T, Yarali H, Urman B, Dagli V, Dogan L. Uterine rupture following hysteroscopic lysis of synechiae due to tuberculosis and uterine perforation. Hum Reprod 1996; 11:291-3.
  20. Deaton JL, Maier D, Andreoli J. Spontaneous uterine rupture during pregnancy after treatment of Asherman's syndrome sees currents. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160:1053-4.
  21. Khopkar U, Williams RM, Selinger M. Morbid adhesion of the placenta after hysteroscopic lysis of intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 2006; 86:1513e1-1513e3.