Clinical and phmetric evaluation of gastro-esophageal reflux impact on upper airways in adult

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Sethom Anissa
Khemaies Akkari
Khaled Riahi
Imed Miled
Sonia Benzarti
Mohamed Kamel Chebbi

Abstract

Background: Gastroesophageal reflux is a frequent and benign affection. It represents an etiopathological entity in otorhinolaryngology; that may occasion a large variety of ENT manifestations.
Aim: To evaluate clinical and pHmetric impact of gastro esophageal reflux on upper airways in adult.
Methods: Prospective study about 95 cases diagnosed and treated at the ENT department of military hospital of Tunis. Clinical features, pH metric profiles and therapeutic approach are reported and compared to the literature.
Results: The mean age was 37 years old. Sex ratio was 1.16. Pharyngolaryngeal symptoms dominated ENT manifestations (41 cases). Laryngeal dyspnea, cough and dysphonia were predictive of danger. Positive pH metric rate collated to posterior laryngitis and pharyngitis were respectively 81.2% and 79.1%. Posterior laryngitis, dental erosion and chronic sinusitis, seem to have pejorative significance.
Conclusion: Otorhinolaryngologist must think about asymptomatic reflux every time when chronic or recurrent ENT affection remain unexplained after complete clinical investigations. PH monitoring confirms gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Keywords:

Gastroesophageal reflux, ENT manifestations, 24 hours PH monitoring.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Magnan J. ; Chays A. ; Grimaud C. ; Salducci J. Manifestations otorhinologiques du reflux gastro-oesophagien chez l'adulte. Rev Soc Fr ORL 1997 ; 45 ; 60 - 4.
  2. Kahrilas PJ. GERD pathogenesis, pathophysiology, and clinical manifestations. Cleve Clin J Med 2003; 70: S4-19.
  3. Quigley EM. New developments in the pathophysiology of gastrooesophageal reflux disease (GERD): implications for patient management. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003; 2:43-51.
  4. Abdelli MN, Sfar S, Ben Abdallah H, Bouali MR. Place du reflux gastro-?sophagien nocturne au cours des manifestations supra- ?sophagiennes du reflux. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2007;31: A251
  5. Karoui S, Matri S, Boubaker J, Filali A. Technique, indications et résultats de la pHmétrie oesophagienne des 24 heures. Tun Med 2002; 80:108-112
  6. Ulualp SO, Toohill RJ, Shaker R. Loss of secondary oesophageal peristalsis is not a contributory pathogenetic factor in posterior laryngitis. An Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2001; 110: 152-7.
  7. Loughlin CJ , Koufman JA. Paroxysmal laryngospasm secondary to gastroesophageal reflux. Laryngoscope 1996; 106: 1502-5.
  8. DevaulT KR, Castell DO. Updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastoesophageal reflux disease. The Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 190-200.
  9. Bouchard S, Lallier M, Yazbeck S. The otolaryngologic manifestations of gastrophageal reflux. J Pediatr Surg 1999; 34 : 1053 - 6.
  10. Denoyelle F. Otites trainantes, mastoïdites subaiguës. Rev Prat 1991; 41 : 855-6.
  11. Parlier G, Roger G, Charritat J et al. Otites trainantes du nourrison et reflux gastroesophagien. Ann Pediatr 1996; 43: 177-82
  12. Koufman JA. The otolaryngologic magnifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease Laryngoscope 1991; 101; 1-78.
  13. Winer JG, Koufman JA, Wu W. The pharyngo-esophageal dual ambulatory PH probe for evaluation of atypical manifestations of gastroesopharyngeal reflux. Gastroenterology 1987; 92: 1694-9.
  14. Parsons DS. Chronic sinusitis: a medical or surgical disease? Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1996; 29:1-9.
  15. Schrooeder PL, Filler SJ, Ramirez B et al. Dental erosion and Acid reflux disease. Ann Intern Med 1995; 122: 809-15
  16. Vaezi MF. The role of pH monitoring in extraoesophageal gastrooesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;23:40-9.
  17. Jacob P, Kahribas PJ, Herzon G. Proximal esophageal Phmetry in patients with reflux laryngitis Gastroenterology 1991; 100: 305-10.
  18. Katz Pu. Ambulatory esophageal and hypopharyngeal PH monitoring in patients with Hoareness. Am J Gastroenterol 1990; 85: 38-40