Colorectal neoplasia in elderly versus young patients in tunisia: analysis of colonoscopic findings

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Asma Ouakaa-Kchaou
Hela Elloumi
Afef Ouaz
Dalila Gargouri
Rania Hefaiedh
Asma Kochlef
Afef Kilani
Malika Romani
Jamel Kharrat
Abdeljabbar Ghorbel

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer occurs more frequently in older patients. Since the older population is increasing, a better understanding of the characteristics of colorectal neoplasm according to the age would be useful.
Aim: To determine the differences of clinical characteristics of colorectal neoplasm including polyps between the elderly and young patients.
Methods: Colonoscopy database from 2004 to 2008 was retrospectively analyzed. There were 1510 eligible patients who underwent colonoscopy with a mean age of 54 years. Patients were classified into two groups: the older age group (Group 1, aged ³ 60 years, n = 626) and the younger age group (Group 2, aged < 60 years, n = 884). Data were recorded on age, gender, colonoscopic indications, colonoscopic findings, and their related histological findings and tumor location.
Results: The risk of finding polyps and cancer at colonoscopy increases with age (29.4% in the older age group and 11% in the younger age group (p < 0.05). Left-sided lesions were noted to be more frequent in both age groups (66% and 67% respectively).
Conclusion: The chance of detecting colorectal neoplasm by colonoscopy was higher in the elderly. However, both groups had the lesions predominately located in the left side.

Keywords:

Colorectal neoplasm, colonoscopy, elderly

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Rerknimitr R, Ratanapanish W, Kongkam P, Kullavanijaya P. Differences in characteristics of colorectal neoplasm between young and elderly Thaïs. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12:7684-9.
  2. McCashland TM, Brand R, Lyden E, De Garmo P. Gender differences in colorectal polyps and tumors. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96:882-9.
  3. Arora A, Singh P. Colonoscopy in patients 80 years of age and older is safe, with high success rate and diagnostic yield. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60:408-13.
  4. Nelson RL, Dollear T, Freels S, Persky V. The relation of age, race and gender to subsite location of colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 1997; 80:193-7.
  5. Brenner H, Hoffmeister M, Arndt V, Haug U. Gender differences in colorectal cancer: implications for age at initiation screening. British J Cancer 2007; 96:828-31.
  6. Okamoto M, Shiratori Y, Yamaji Y et al. Relationship between age and site of colorectal cancer based on colonoscopy findings. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55:548-51.
  7. Slater G, Papatestas AE, Tartter PI, Mulvihill M, Aufses AH. Age distribution of right and left-sided colorectal cancers. Am J Gastroenterol 1982; 77:63-6.
  8. Strul H, Kariv R, Leshno M et al. The prevalence rate and anatomic location of colorectal adenoma and cancer detected by colonoscopy in average-risk individuals aged 40-80 years. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101:255-62.
  9. Nawa T, Kato J, Kawamoto H, et al. Difference between right and left-sided colon cancer in patient characteristics, cancer morphology and histology. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 23:418- 23.
  10. Wu X, Chen WV, Martin J, et al. Subsite-specific colorectal cancer incidence rates and stage distribution among Asians and pacific islanders in the United States, 1995 to 1999. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004; 13:1215-22.
  11. Wu XC, Chen WV, Steele B et al. Subsite-specific incidence rate and stage of disease in colorectal cancer by race, gender and age group in the United States, 1992 - 1997. Cancer 2001; 92:2547- 54.
  12. Wu XC, Cokkinides V, Chen WV et al. Associations of subsitespecific colorectal cancer incidence rates and stage of disease at diagnosis with country-level poverty, by race and sex. Cancer 2006;107: 1121-7.
  13. Rex DK, Chak A, Vasudeva R et al. Prospective determination of distal colon findings in average-risk patients with proximal colon cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49:727-30.