Neonatal Hearing Screening with Transient Otoacoustic Emissions: pilot study.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Emira Ben Hamida Nouaili
Sihem Chaouachi
Ahlem Bezzine
Majda Hamadi
Chiraz Mbarek
Lotfi Benlallehom
Zahra Marrakchi

Abstract

Background: Bilateral hearing loss is present in 1-3 per 1000 newborn infants, and in 2-4 per 100 infants in the intensive care unit population. All infants with hearing loss should be identified before 3 months of age and receives intervention by 6 months. If undetected, this will impede speech, language, and cognitive development. In Tunisia, we do not have an exhaustive information on the real importance of the auditive handicap.
The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and the practical aspects of a pilot tunisian universal neonatal hearing screening (UNHS) program based on transient evoked otoacoustic emission reporting the incidence of hearing impairment in this population.
Methods: A prospective study during one year (01/05/2006 to the 30/04/2007). Transient evoked otoacoustic emission was planned for all live births. If the test could not be practised in maternity or that research was negative, an appointment was delivered for a research of the O.T.E.A.P in an interval of 1 week - 1 month. Infants who did not meet TEOAE pass criteria underwent diagnostic auditory brainstem response (ABR) testing.
Results: During the study period, 3342 live births were recorded, 3260 were included. Total coverage rate was of 41% (1333/3260).
We recorded 3 cases of bilateral hearing loss (0.9 ‰ screened infants) and 5 with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss (1.5 ‰ screened infants)
Conclusion :
The incidence of congenital hearing loss in our
population seems relatively high. Hearing screening for all neonates
using transient evoked otoacoustic emission is feasible but several
practical aspects should be revised.

Keywords:

Neonatal screening, otoacoustic emissions, hearing loss

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Dalzell L, Orlando M et al. The New York State universal newborn hearing screening demonstration project: ages of hearing loss identification, hearing aid fitting, and enrollement in early intervention. Ear Hear 2000 ; 21: 118-30.
  2. Finitzo T, Albright K, O'Neal J. The newborn with hearing loss: detection in the nursery. Pediatrics 1998; 102:1452-60.
  3. American Academy of Pediatrics. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing 1994 Position Statement. Pediatrics 1995; 95:152-6.
  4. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing.Year 2000 Position Statement : Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Pediatrics 2000 ; 106 : 798-817.
  5. Davis A, Bamford J, Wilson I, Ramkalawan T, Forshaw M, Wright S. A critical review of the role of neonatal hearing screening in the detection of congenital hearing impairment. Health Technol Assess 1997; 1:1-177.
  6. Finitzo T, Albright K, O'Neal J. The newborn with hearing loss: detection in the nursery. Pediatrics 1998; 102:1452-60.
  7. Martin JAM, Bentzen O, Colley JRT et al. Childhood deafness in the European community. Scand Audiol. 1981; 10:165-74
  8. Mehl A.L., Thomson V. The Colorado newborn hearing screening project, 1992-1999; on the threshold of effective population-based universal newborn hearing screening. Pediatrics 2002 Jan; 109: 1-8.
  9. Vohr BR, Carty LM, Moore PE, Letourneau K. The Rhode Island Hearing Assessment Program: experience with statewide hearing screening (1993-1996). J Pediatr 1998; 133:353-7.
  10. H.S. Habib, H. Abdelgaffar. Neonatal hearing screening with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in Western Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 2005; 69: 839-842.
  11. A.B.Maxon, K.R.White,B.Kulpepper, B.R.Vohr. Maintaining acceptably low referral rates in TEOAE- based newborn hearing screening programs. J.Commun. Disord.30:457-475.