Clear cell carcinoma of the uterus

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Dalenda Hentati
Bacem Belghith
Lotfi Kochbati
Maha Driss
Monji Maalej

Abstract

Aim : The aim of this study was to determine the characteristics and outcome of patients presenting with clear cell carcinoma (CCC) of the endometrium treated in a single institution.
Methods: We reviewed the records of patients treated in the Salah- Azaiz institute for CCC of the endometrium. A histopathological stage was retrospectively assigned to these patients according to the FIGO classification and was compared to the clinical stage. Pathological features were studied in order to determine predictif factors of extrauterine disease extention and failure patterns.
Results: 12 patients were included in the study. The mean age at diagnosis was 64 years (50 to 84 yers). Upstaging after surgery was found in 9 patients. 9 patients had extrauterine extension. Deap myometrial invasion was not correlated with extrauterine extension. After a median follw up of 32 months, 4 patients presented with recurrences: one vaginal recurrence, two cases of pelvic and abdominal recurrence and abdominal recurrence in one patient. All recurrences occurred during the first year after surgery. Tumor recurrence was located within the radiation field in one case. Two paients with abdomino-pelvic recurrences progressed despite the association of surgery, radiation therapy and chemotherapy.
Conclusion: Extrauterine extension is frequent at diagnosis and not correlated to classical risk factors observed in endometrioid carcinoma. A comptlete surgical staging is necessary for adjuvant treatment. Locoregional and distant recurrences are frequent and have a poor outcome.

Keywords:

Clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium, pathology, treatment, prognosis

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Murphy KT, Rotmensch J, Yamada D, Mundt AJ. Outcome and patterns of failure in pathologic stage I-IV clear-cell carcinoma of the endometrium: implications for adjuvant radiation therapy. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys 2003; 55: 1272-6
  2. Tropé C, Kristensen GB, Abeler VM. Clear-cell and papillary serous cancer: treatment option. Best practice and research clinical obstetrics and gynecology 2001; 15: 433-46
  3. Alber VN, Kjørstad KE. Clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium: A histopathological and clinical study of 97 cases. Gynecol Oncol 1991; 40: 207-17
  4. Alektiar KM, McKee A, Lin O et al. Is there a difference in outcome between stage I-II endometrial cancer of papillary serous/clear cell and endometrioid FIGO grade 3 cancer? Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys 2002; 54: 79-85
  5. Cirisano FD, Robby SJ, Dodge RK et al. Epidemiologic and surgicopathologic findings of papillary serous and clear cell endometrial cancers when compared to endometrioid carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 1999; 74: 385-94
  6. Cirrisano FD, Robboy SJ, Dodge RK et al. The outcome of stage I-II clinically and surgically staged papillary serous and clear cell endometrial cancers when compared with endometrioid carcinoma. Gynaecologic oncology 2000; 77: 55-65
  7. Craighead PS, Sait K, Stuart GC et al. Management of aggressive histologic variants of endometrial carcinoma at the Tom Baker Cancer Centre between 1984 and 1994. Gynecologic oncology 2000; 77: 248-253
  8. Creasman WT, Kohler MF, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, Boyle P. Prognosis of papillary serous, clear cell and grade 3 stage I carcinoma of the endometrium. Gynaecologic oncology 2004; 95: 593-596
  9. Sutten G, Axelrod JH, Bundy BN et al. Adjuvant whole abdominal irradiation in clinical stage I-II papillary serous and clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium: a phase II study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Gynecologic oncology 2006; 100: 349-354
  10. Smith RS, Kapp DS, Chen Q, Teng NNH. Treatment of high-risk uterine cancer with whole abdominopelvic radiation therapy. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys 2000; 48: 767-778
  11. Mendivil A, Schuler KM, Gehrig PA. Non-endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterine corpus: a review of selected histological subtypes. Cancer control 2009; 16: 46-52
  12. Boran N, Akdag D, Halici F et al. A restrospective analysis of the diameter of metastatic lymph nodes in apparently early stage endometrial cancer. Tumori 2008; 94: 681-5
  13. Martinez AA, Weiner S, Podratz K et al. Improved outcome at 10 years for serous-papillary/clear cell or high risk endometrial cancer patients treated by adjuvant high-dose whole abdomino-pelvic irradiation. Gynecologic oncology 2003; 90: 537-546
  14. Stewart KD, Martinez AA, Weiner S et al. Ten-year outcome including patterns of failure and toxicity for adjuvant whole abdominopelvic irradiation in high-risk and poor histologic feature patients with endometrial carcinoma. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys 2002; 54: 527-535
  15. Sutton G, Axelrod JH, Bundy BN et al. Whole abdominal radiotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of patients with stage III an IV endometrial cancer: a Gynaecologic Oncology Group study. Gynaecologic oncology 2005; 97: 755-763
  16. Thomas A, Mariani A, Wright JD et al. Surgical management and adjuvant therapy for patients with uterine clear cell carcinoma: A multiinstitutional review. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 108: 293-7