NEUROLOGIC BLADDER IN PATIENTS WITH SPINAL CORD INJURY. PROTOCOL OF SURVEILLANCE AND MANAGMENT

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Nader Hadiji
I. Miri
F.Z Ben Salah
H. Rahali
S. Koubaa
S. Lebib
Catherine Dziri

Abstract

Background : bladder dysfunction is constant in patients with spinal cord injury and this whatever is the injury level. They are characterized by a variable profile and changing in the course of the years. They constitute not only, an important cause of morbidity in this population but also mortality.
Aim : The aim of this work is to emphasize the importance of the diagnosis and to study the bladder behaviour while clarifying the evolution of this type of bladder and to present a protocol of management of a neurogenic bladder.
Methods: retrospective study. 2 assessments in 6 months of interval were realized. The bladder evaluation consisted in a biological assessment, a urinary ultasound, a cystography and urodynamic investigations. The managment is initially realized there to hospital.
Results: our study contains 62 persons with spinal cord injury of average age of 32,4 years with post traumatic period average is of 41,47 months. The various evaluations allowed us to conclude that there is a significant change of the neurological status as well as the urinary biological values with significant deterioration of the various ultrasound, cystography and urodynamic data.
Conclusion: the diagnosis and the management of the neurological bladders of persons with spinal cord injury have to be besides the other deficiencies that these patients as well as neurological, orthopaedic, and cutaneous devices, because this is going to allow to improve their quality as well as their life expectation. Our results underline the importance and the necessity to establish a protocol of neurogenic bladder control rigorous and codified which remains to adapt according to every patient. This protocol is sometimes difficult to apply given the fact of the misunderstanding of this type of deficiency. .

Keywords:

neurogenic bladder, spinal cord injury, urologic complication, long term surveillance

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Kitahara S, Iwatsubo E, Yasuda K, Ushiyama T, Nakai H, Suzuki T, Yamashita T, Sato R, Kihara T, Yamanishi T, Nohara Y. Practice patterns of Japanese physicians in urologic surveillance and management of spinal cord injury patients. Spinal Cord. 2006; 44: 362-8.
  2. Schurch.B, MD, Schmid, MD, Kaegi.K, . Value of Sensory Examination in Predicting Bladder Function in Patients With T12- L1 Fractures and Spinal Cord Injury.ArchPhys Med Rehabil. January 2003;84 : 83-89.
  3. Watanabe T, Vaccaro AR, Kumon H, Welch WC, Rivas DA, Chancellor MB. High incidence of occult neurogenic bladder dysfunction in neurologically intact patients with thoracolumbar spinal injuries. J Urol 1998;159:965-8
  4. Schurch.B, Schmid.MD, Karsenty.G, Reitz.A. Can neurologic examination predict type of detrusor sphinter dyssynergia in patients with spinal cord injury. Adult Urology. 2005;65 : 243-46.
  5. Cardenas D,Hooton TM. Urinary tract infection in persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76 : 272-80.
  6. Perkash I. Donald Munro Lecture 2003. Neurogenic bladder: past, present, and future. Spinal Cord 2004;27 : 383-6.
  7. MacDiarmid SA, McIntyre WJ,AnthonyA, Bailey RR, Truner JG, Arnold EP. Monitoring of renal function in patients with spinal cord injury. BJU Int 2000;85 : 1014-18.
  8. Lawrensen R, JJ Wyndale, I Vlachonikolis. Renal failure in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfonction. Neuroepidemiology 2001;20 : 138-143.
  9. Farhad Sepahpanah, MD, Stephen P. Burns, MD, Barbara McKnight, PhD, Claire C. Yang, MD. Role of Creatinine Clearance as a Screening Test in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury. ArchPhys Med Rehabil. April 2006;87 : 524-28.
  10. Grise P. prise en charge d'un résidu post mictionnel. Pelvipérinéologie 2006;1:30-1.
  11. Kyle J.Weld, Roger R. Dmochowski. Association of level of injury and bladder behavior in patients with post-tramatic spinal cord injury. Adult Urology 2000; 55 : 490-94.
  12. Jamil F. Towards a catheter free status in neurogenic bladder dysfunction a review of bladder managment options in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2001;39:355-61.
  13. A.Ruffon, M. De Sèze, P. Denys, B. Perrouin-Verbe, E.Chartier Kastler et les membres du GENULF. Suivi des vessies neurologiques du blessé médullaire et du patient porteur d'une myéloméningocèle. Revue de la littérature et recommandations pratiques de suivi. Pelvi-périnéologie 2006 ;1 :1778-3712.
  14. Ghoniem GM, Roach MB, Lewis VH, harmon E. The value leak pressure and bladder compliance in the urodynamic evaluation of myelomeningocele patients. J Urology 1990;141:140-42.
  15. Beric A, Light K. Detrusor function with lesions of the connus medullaris. J Urol 1992;148:104.
  16. Buzelin JM, Labat JJ, ROSSIER A, Perrigot M, Bor Y, Bitker MO et al. Les dysfonctionnements vésicosphinctériens neurologiques. In: Khoury S éd Urologie: physiologie et pathologie de la dynamique des voies urinaires. Mantes La Jolie:FIIS,1987:402-470.
  17. Hackler RH, Hall MK, Zampieri TA. Bladder hypocompliance in the spinal cord injury population. J Urology 1989;141 : 1390-1394.
  18. Weld KJ, Graney MJ, Dmochowski RR. Differences in bladder compliance with time and associations of bladder management with compliance in spinal cord injured patients. J Urology 2000;163 : 1228-33.
  19. Yoshimura N, De Groat WC. Neural control of the lower urinary tract. Int J Urol 1997;4 : 111-25.
  20. Galloway N.T.M, Mekras J.A, Helms M, Webster GD. An objective score to predict upper tract deteriration in myelodysplasi. J.Urol 1991;145 : 535-37.