A COMPARAISON OF THE EFFECT OF THE ORAL CAPTOPRIL AND NICARDIPINE IN HYPERTENSIVE CRISIS

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Faouzi Addad
Hayet Ferjani
Abdelghani Chaabani
Mounir Jelliti
Habib Gamra
Hatem Makni
Ben Hamda Khaldoun
Zohra Dridi
Mohamed Ben Farhat

Abstract

Background : Hypertensive crisis is defined as a severe elevation in blood pressure (BP) without target organ injury. There are few data about the efficacy and safety of comparative oral antihypertensive drugs.
Aim : To compare the efficacy and safety of oral captopril (25 mg) and nicardipine (20 mg) in hypertensive crisis.
Methods : This prospective, randomized study included 50 patients attended at the emergency department with a hypertensive crisis (arterial blood pressure of at least 180/110 mmHg without target organ damage confirmed after 15 min of rest. Systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and heart rate (HR) were assessed at several intervals during 4 h after the drug administration. Therapeutic success was defined by a SBP²160 and DBP²90 mmHg two hours after drug administration. The initial clinical characteristics as age, sex, initial systolic and diastolic BP and HR were no different in the two groups.
Results : BP levels started to significantly decrease within 15 minutes. At 2 hours, SBP and DBP dropped were similar in captopril group and nicardipine group, respectively to 162/94 vs 161/89 mmHg; p=ns. The therapeutic success at the second hour has been obtained in 68% of cases in the two groups. Age >70 years was a predictor’s factor of therapeutic failure in the captopril group. Heart rate significantly dropped after 30 min in the captopril group (82.3 ± 11.8 vs 77.6 ± 12.7 c/min; p=0.037). This effect was maintained over four hours. There were no side effects in this study.
Conclusions : Oral captopril or nicardipine are efficacy and safe in the treatment of hypertensive crisis.

Keywords:

Captopril, nicardipine, hypertensive crisis, emergency, randomized trial

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Jones DW, Hall JE. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure and evidence from new hypertension trials. Hypertension. 2004 ; 43 : 1-3.
  2. O'Mailia JJ, Sander GE, Giles TD. Nifedipine-associated myocardial ischemia or infarction in the treatment of hypertensive urgencies. Ann Intern Med. 1987 ; 107 : 185-6.
  3. Wachter RM. Symptomatic hypotension induced by nifedipine in the acute treatment of severe hypertension. Arch Intern Med. 1987 ; 147 : 556-8.
  4. Schwartz M, Naschitz JE, Yeshurun D, Sharf B. Oral nifedipine in the treatment of hypertensive urgency : Cerebrovascular accident following a single dose. Arch Intern Med. 1990 ; 150 : 686-7.
  5. Cherney D, Straus S. Management of patients with hypertensive urgencies and emergencies : a systematic review of the literature. J Gen Intern Med. 2002 ; 17 : 937-45.
  6. Komsuoglu B, Sengun B, Bayram A, Komsuoglu SS. Treatment of hypertensive urgencies with oral nifedipine, nicardipine, and captopril. Angiology. 1991 ; 42 : 447-54.
  7. Gemici K, Karakoc Y, Ersoy A, Baran II, Gullulu S, Cordan J. A Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Sublingual Captopril with Sublingual Nifedipine in Hypertensive Crisis. International Journal of Angiology. 1999 ; 8 : 147-149.
  8. Karnik ND, Bhatt AD, Trivedi TH, Dadkar VN, Kapadia NM, Vaidya AB, Khokhani RC. Nifedipine, captopril, metoprolol and nifedipine with metoprolol in hypertensive crisis in non-intensive care setting. J Assoc Physicians India. 1996 ; 44 : 480-2.
  9. Perez C, Dougnac A, Alvarez M, Andresen M, Diaz O, Geni R, Prat G, Vasquez M. [Sublingual captopril versus nifedipine in the treatment of hypertensive crisis]. Rev Med Chil. 1991 ; 119 : 402-5.
  10. Ceyhan B, Karaaslan Y, Caymaz O, Oto A, Oram E, Oram A, Ugurlu S. Comparison of sublingual captopril and sublingual nifedipine in hypertensive emergencies. Jpn J Pharmacol. 1990 ; 52 : 189-93.
  11. Guerrera G, Melina D, Capaldi L, Mauro R, Colivicchi F, Cardillo C, Musumeci V, Savi L, Santoliquido A, et al. [Sublingually administered captopril versus nifedipine in hypertension emergencies]. Minerva Cardioangiol. 1990 ; 38 : 37-44.
  12. Castro del Castillo A, Rodriguez M, Gonzalez E, Rodriguez F, Estruch J. Dose-response effect of sublingual captopril in hypertensive crises. J Clin Pharmacol. 1988 ; 28 : 667-70.
  13. Alletto M, Burgio A, Fulco G, Paradiso R, Piangiamore M, Vancheri F. [Sublingual captopril in hypertensive crises]. Recenti Prog Med. 1992 ; 83 : 503-5.
  14. Habib GB, Dunbar LM, Rodrigues R, Neale AC, Friday KJ. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of oral nicardipine in treatment of urgent hypertension: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Am Heart J. 1995
  15. Dessi-Fulgheri P, Bandiera F, Rubattu S, Cocco F, Madeddu P, Oppes M, Tonolo GC, Glorioso N, Rappelli A. Comparison of sublingual and oral captopril in hypertension. Clin Exp Hypertens A. 1987 ; 9 : 593-7.
  16. Damasceno A, Ferreira B, Patel S, Sevene E, Polonia J. Efficacy of captopril and nifedipine in black and white patients with hypertensive crisis. J Hum Hypertens. 1997;11:471-6.
  17. Weber MA, Neutel JM, Smith DH. Circulatory and extracirculatory effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition. Am Heart J. 1992 ; 123 : 1414-20.
  18. Gemici K, Kazazoglu AR, Yesilbursa D, Serdar A, Ener S, Aydifinlar A, Buyukuysal L, Cobanoglu N. The Effects of Sublingual Administration of Captopril on Parameters of Exercise Test and Neurohormonal Activation in Patients With Stable Angina Pectoris.
  19. Magherli S, Bouida W, El Atrous S, Boujderia R, Nouira S, Abroug F. Etudes comparatives prospectives et randomisées de 3 antihypertenseurs injectables dans l'hypertension sévère.Rean Urg 1997 ; 6 : 289-296.
  20. Gemici K, Baran I, Bakar M, Demircan C, Ozdemir B, Cordan J. Evaluation of the effect of the sublingually administered nifedipine and captopril via transcranial doppler ultrasonography during hypertensive crisis. Blood Press. 2003 ; 12 : 46-8.