La tunisie Medicale - 2021 ; Vol 99 ( n°011 ) : 1030-1035
[ 2757 times seen ]

Introduction: Serious games are interactive and entertaining digital software with an educational purpose, and they are increasingly being used in undergraduate medical education. Effective serious games attempt to form positive mood in order to encourage players to continue the play, leading to increased interest in gameplay and satisfaction as well as better academic performances.
Aim: To determine  the medical students’ satisfaction, situational and individual interest during a serious game.
Methods : This was a prospective study performed during a 2-year period (2018-2019 and 2019-2020). A total of 108 third-year medical students participated in this study. Students were asked to play a serious game on a computer for 20 minutes. A set of questionnaires containing evaluation grids to measure the satisfaction and interest was given to students. The effectiveness of the game was assessed using pre and post-tests.
Results : Following the exclusion criteria of students due to missing data, complete data were available for 97 students. Satisfaction and interest experienced by the students were high. The median of the game performance of students was 418, 04 points. There was a positive relationship between ease of use and game performance.
There was a negative correlation between the three scales of interest and game performance.
There was a significant difference between the mean scores of pre-tests and post-tests (p<0.01).
Conclusion: The results of this study suggest the potentials of serious game on medical student’s satisfaction, interest and learning achievement.

Key - Words
  1. 1. Frehywot S, Vovides Y, Talib Z, et al. E-learning in medical education in resource constrained low-and middle-income countries. Hum Resour Health. 2013;11(1):1–15. 2. Kapralos B, Fisher S, Clarkson J, et al. A course on serious game design and development using an online problem-based learning approach. Interactive Technol Smart Educ. 2015;12(2):116–136. 3. Graafland M, Schraagen J, Schijven M. Systematic review of serious games for medical education and surgical skills training. Br J Surg. 2012;99(10):1322– 1330. 4. Zhonggen Y, “A meta-analysis of use of serious games in education over a decade,” International Journal of Computer Games Technology.2019 : 8. 5. Connolly TM, Boyle, EA, MacArthur E, Hainey T. and Boyle JM. A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers and Education.2012 ; 59: 661–686. 6. Juan A A , Loch B, Daradoumis T, and Ventura S. Games and simulation in higher education,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education.2017 ;14 :1. 7. Davis, F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly.1989 : 319-340. 8. Chainon,D., Fenouillet, F. & Heutte, J.. Proposition pour une mesure de l'intérêt situationnel en contexte d'usage des TIC en éducation. 2e Colloque international sur les TIC en éducation: bilan,enjeux actuels et perspectives futures. Montréal, Canada.2014. 9. Hamari J, Shernoff DJ, Rowe E, et al. Challenging games help students learn: an empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game-based learning. Comput Human Behav 2016;54:170–9. 10. Westera W, Nadolski RJ, Hummel HGK, et al. Serious games for higher education: a framework for reducing design complexity. J Comput Assist Learn 2008;24:420–32. 11. Elias, H. , Mustafa, S. , Roslan, S. , & Noah, S. Examining potential relationships between flow and motivational forces in Malaysian secondary school students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,2011. 12. Mlika M, Zorgati MM, Mezni F. Designing a serious game about critical appraisal of medical literature for pregraduate students. Tunis Med. 2020 Jul;98(7):543-549. 13. Hummel H G, Van Houcke J, Nadolski R, Van Der Hiele T, Kurvers H, and A. L¨ohr A, Scripted collaboration in serious gaming for complex learning: Effects of multiple perspectives when acquiring water management skills,” British Journal of Educational Technology2011 ;42 :1029–1041. 14. Wang Y , Rajan P , Sankar C, and Raju P. Let them play: the impact of mechanics and dynamics of a serious game on student perceptions of learning engagement,” IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.2017 ; 10 : 514–525. 15. Hwang G J and Chang H F. A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education.2011 ; 56 :1023–1031. 16. Meyer, B., & Sorensen, B. H. Designing serious games for computer assisted language learning-A framework for development and analysis. In M. Kankaanranta, & P. Neittaanmäki (Eds.), Design and use of serious games.2009 : 69-82. 17. Nazry,N. Nazrina M, and Romano D.Mood and learning in navigation-based serious games. Computers in Human Behavior.2017 ; 73 :596–604. 18. Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Siemens, G.: Let’s not forget: learning analytics are about learning. TechTrends.2015 ; 59 : 64–71. 19. Jivet, I., Scheffel, M., Drachsler, H., Specht, M.: Awareness is not enough: pitfalls of learning analytics dashboards in the educational practice. In: Lavoué, É., Drachsler, H., Verbert, K., Broisin, J., Pérez-Sanagustín, M. (eds.) EC-TEL .2017 ;10474 :82–96. 20. Middeke A, Anders S, Schuelper M, Raupach T, Schuelper N. Training of clinical reasoning with a Serious Game versus small-group problem-based learning: A prospective study. PLoS One. 2018;11:13-9. 21. Olszewski AE, Wolbrink TA. Serious Gaming in Medical Education: A Proposed Structured Framework for Game Development. Simul Healthc. 2017;12(4):240-253. 22. Davids MR, Chikte UM, Halperin ML. Development and evaluation of a multimedia e-learning resource for electrolyte and acid-base disorders. Adv Physiol Educ 2011;35(3):295–306. 23. Gleason AW. RELM: developing a serious game to teach evidence-based medicine in an academic health sciences setting. Med Ref Serv Q 2015; 34(1):17–28. 24. Graafland M, Schraagen JM, Schijven MP. Systematic review of serious games for medical education and surgical skills training. Br J Surg 2012; 99(10):1322–1330. 25. Cook DA, Hatala R, Brydges R, et al. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2011;306(9):978–988.
E-mail :
Password :
Remember Me Forgot password? Sign UP
Keywords most used
Tunisia treatment Child surgery diagnosis prognosis Children Crohn’s disease epidemiology Risk factors Breast cancer screening Cancer prevalence Quality of life
Sign up to receive our newsletter
E-mail :
Stay in Touch
Join Us! !